Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Driving Mechanism of CSR Strategy in Chinese Construction Companies based on Neo-Institutional Theory

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chinese construction companies, represented by huge Chinese construction corporations (HCCCs), have taken steps to develop their CSR (corporate social responsibility) strategy. To investigate the driving mechanisms of the CSR strategy of HCCCs, an analytical framework is proposed based on neo-institutional theory to explore how organizational legitimacy affects managerial perceptible institutional pressures and ultimately affects the development of CSR strategy. Specific scales were developed for HCCCs, and a questionnaire survey was conducted. Structural equation modelling was adopted to verify the paths proposed by the theoretical model. The results show that the expectations of the public and subcontractors/suppliers do not constitute sources of HCCCs’ organizational legitimacy. Different stakeholders have different influences on different institutional pressures. Environmental organizations have the most prominent effects. Government can reduce concerns about the CSR performance of HCCCs in society, and clients have a significant influence on the formation of institutional pressure, but employees’ demands still need to be taken seriously by management. Additionally, due to the lack of regulations and norms in China, the promotion of CSR strategies relies mainly on the spontaneous demands of HCCCs. The applicability of neo-institutional theory to construction corporations is verified. The identified driving mechanisms help to effectively promote business strategy for HCCCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., and Ganapathi, J. (2007). “Putting the S. Back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 836–863, DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988). “On the evaluation of structural equation models.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 74–94, DOI: 10.1007/BF02723327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthorpe, S., James, R., and Taylor, S. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: An imperative or imposition upon the UK construction industry, CIB World Congress, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sen, S. (2004). “Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives.” California Management Review, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 9–24, DOI: 10.2307/41166284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bice, S. (2017). “Corporate social responsibility as institution: A social mechanisms framework.” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 143, No. 1, pp. 17–34, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2791-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, K., Moon, J., and Matten, D. (2012). “An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications.” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 111, No. 2, pp. 281–299, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1208-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. L. (2007). “Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 946–967, DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. and Holladay, S. J. (2011). Managing corporate social responsibility: A communication approach, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. W. (1983). “The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields.” American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. (2010). The impacts of construction and the built environment, WD Re-Thinking Ltd., Letchworth, UK. https://doi.org/www.willmottdixon.co.uk/asset/download/9462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J. (2010). The path of the impact on corporate social responsibility behaviour, PhD Thesis, University of Fudan, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G. and Levinthal, D. (2000). “Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, M. (2009). Global construction 2020-A global forecast for the construction industry over the next, decade to 2020, Global Construction Perspectives and Oxford Economics, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, A. (2011). “Fulfilling contractors’ corporate social responsibilities using standards-based management systems.” International Journal of Construction Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 37–47, DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2011.10773167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, W. and Wong, J. K. W. (2016). “Key activity areas of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry: A study of China.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 113, pp. 850–860, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., Comfort, D., and Hillier, D. (2006). “Corporate social responsibility and the UK construction industry.” Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 134–150, DOI: 10.1108/14630010610711757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kshetri, N. (2007). “Institutional factors affecting offshore business process and information technology outsourcing.” Journal of International Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 38–56, DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2006.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. D. P. (2011). “Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies.” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 281–298, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0814-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., Badu, E., Owusu-Manu, D. G., Edwards, D. J., and Holt, G. D. (2013). “Corporate social responsibility architecture and project alignments: A study of the Ghanaian construction industry.” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 334–353, DOI: 10.1108/JEDT-09-2012-0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loosemore, M. and Lim, B. T. H. (2017). “Linking corporate social responsibility and organizational performance in the construction industry.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 90–105, DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2016.1242762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, W., Shen, L., and Yam, M. C. H. (2008). “Critical success factors for competitiveness of contractors: China study.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 12, pp. 972–982, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:12(972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manville, B. and Ober, J. (2003). “Beyond empowerment: Building a company of citizens.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., and Davis, G. F. (2007). “Community isomorphism and corporate social action.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 925–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. (1977). “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., and Peng, M. W. (2009). “Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 61–80, DOI: 10.1002/smj.720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni, S. and Barr, P. S. (2008). “Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action: An integrated view.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 29, No. 13, pp. 1395–1427, DOI: 10.1002/smj.717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ntim, C. G. and Soobaroyen, T. (2013). “Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework.” Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 468–494, DOI: 10.1111/corg.12026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994). “The theory of measurement error.” Psychometric Theory, Vol. 3, pp. 209–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic-Lazarevic, S. (2008). “The development of corporate social responsibility in the Australian construction industry.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 93–101, DOI: 10.1080/01446190701819079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2006). “Strategy and society: The link between corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, No. 12, pp. 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, A. D. and Newson, E. (2003). ‘The strategy process within large construction organizations.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 283–296, DOI: 10.1108/09699980310489997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sama, L. and Shoaf, V. (2003). “Global governance in time of crisis containing the incidence and implications of corporate abuses.” Proc., International Conference of the Global Business and Technology Association, GBATA, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 1151–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B. (2006). “Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility.” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 68, pp. 19–33, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9037-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. and Meyer, J. W. (1983). “The organization of societal sectors.” Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, H. B. and Huang, P. L. (2011). “Management implications of the new institutionalism to strategic management theory.” Chinese Journal Management, Vol, 8, No. 3, p. 396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, C. H. and Chang, Y. (2009). “Ambition versus conscience, does corporate social responsibility pay off? The application of matching methods.” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 133–153, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9826-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L. Y., Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, L., and Ji, Y. B. (2010). “Project feasibility study: The key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 254–259, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Department of Fixed Assets Investment (2016). China statistical yearbook on construction, National Bureau of Statistics, Beijing, China.

  • Tam, V. W., Shen, L. Y., and Tam, C. M. (2007). “Assessing the levels of material wastage affected by sub-contracting relationships and projects types with their correlations.” Building and Environment, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 1471–1477, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. Y., Kang, X. P., and Tam, V. W. Y. (2008). “An investigation of construction wastes: an empirical study in Shenzhen.” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 227–236 DOI: 10.1108/17260530810918252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, I. (1975). “What one company is doing about today’s demands on business.” Changing Business-society Interrelationships, pp. 23–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, J. (2008). “CSR performance evaluation indicators based on stakeholder perspective.” Shandong Social Science, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Z. Y., Zhao, X. J., Davidson, K., and Zuo, J. (2012). “A corporate social responsibility indicator system for construction corporations.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 29, pp. 277–289, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q. and Zhang, Q. (2015). “Evaluating practices and drivers of corporate social responsibility: The Chinese context.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 100, pp. 315–324, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Xiaojiang Gao-Zeller, Xiaodong Li & Weina Zhu

  2. School of Management Science & Engineering, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081, China

    Fan Yang

Authors
  1. Xiaojiang Gao-Zeller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaodong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fan Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weina Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fan Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao-Zeller, X., Li, X., Yang, F. et al. Driving Mechanism of CSR Strategy in Chinese Construction Companies based on Neo-Institutional Theory. KSCE J Civ Eng 23, 1939–1951 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0989-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0989-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation