KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 2324–2332 | Cite as

Impact of Intersecting Angles on Evacuation Efficiency of Pedestrian Flows in High Volume: A Case Study in Metro Station

  • Manman Chen
  • Jinghong WangEmail author
  • Youran Zhi
  • Jinhua Sun
Transportation Engineering


The intersection of pedestrian flows is a general phenomenon in daily pedestrian traffic and emergency evacuation. However, lacking of effective controls in crowed areas will result in pedestrian deceleration, stopping, and even threats to safety in evacuation. This paper focused on exploring the influence of different intersecting angles on evacuation efficiency of pedestrian flows in high volume. Through establishing a bidirectional pedestrian flow model with different intersecting angles for a busy metro station in China based on the social force model, two factors, namely the impact between pedestrians and the conflict frequency, were firstly proposed and validated as that playing major roles in influencing the evacuation efficiency during the pedestrian intersection. With the case study, it is found that the best intersecting angle is 120 degree and angles between 40 and 80 degree are unfavorable in optimizing the average crowd speed and the crowd density. The results are verified based on the comparative analysis with some existing experimental results. The outcomes of this work can offer some guidelines to control the intersection of pedestrian flows during evacuation and can make contributions to a proposal for the related, optimized design of a structure to increasing the evacuation efficiency of a dense crowd.


intersecting angles dense crowd high volume social force model impact conflict frequency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ando, K., Ota, H., and Oki, T. (1988). “Forecasting the flow of people.” Railway Res. Rev., Vol. 45, No. 8, pp. 8–14, [Accessed on November 3, 2017] (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  2. Asano, M., Iryo, T., and Kuwahara, M. (2010). “Microscopic pedestrian simulation model combined with a tactical model for route choice behavior.” Transportation Research, Part C, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 842–855, DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, R. and Dong, L. Y. (2005). “Observations and preliminary analysis of characteristics of pedestrian traffic in chinese metropolis.” Journal of Shanghai University (Natural Science), Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 93–97, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2861.2005.01.024. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Chen, M. M., Wang, J. H., and Zhi, Y. R. (2018). “Effect of the ratio of the branch inflow to the total inflow on evacuation efficiency of pedestrians merging at T-junctions.” Procedia Engineering, Vol. 211, pp. 70–77, DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamed, M. M. (2012). “Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings.” Safety Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 63–82, DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00058-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Helbing, D. (1991). “A mathematical model for the behavior of pedestrian.” Behavioral Science, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 298–310, DOI: 10.1002/bs.3830360405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Helbing, D., Buzna, L., Johansson, A., and Werner, T. (2005). “Selforganized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions.” Transportation Science, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 1–24, DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1040.0108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helbing, D., Farkas, I., and Vicsek, T. (2000). “Simulating dynamical features of escape panic.” Nature, Vol. 407, No. 6803, pp. 487–490, DOI: 10.1038/35035023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Helbing, D. and Molnar, P. (1995). “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics.” Physical Review E, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 4282–4286, DOI: 10.1103/physreve.51.4282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Helbing, D. and Vicsek, T. (1999). “Optimal self-organization.” New Journal of Physics, Vol. 1, No. 13, pp. 1–13, DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/1/1/313.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong, S. C., Asce, M., and Leung, W. L. (2010). “Bidirectional pedestrian stream model with oblique intersecting angle.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 3, pp. 234–242, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)te.1943-5436.0000555.Google Scholar
  12. Hoogendoorn, S. P. and Daamen, W. (2005). “Pedestrian behavior at bottlenecks.” Transportation Science, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 147–159, DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1040.0102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, L. D., Chen, T., and Wang, Y. (2015). “Congestion detection of pedestrians using the velocity entropy: A case study of Love Parade 2010 disaster.” Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, Vol. 440, pp. 200–209, DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang, L., Jing Y. S., and Shen, C. (2014). “Obstacle optimization for panic flow - reducing the tangential momentum increases the escape speed.” Plos One, Vol. 9, No. 12, pp. e115463, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lam, W. H. K., Lee, J. Y. S., and Cheung, C. Y. (2002). “A study of the bi-directional pedestrian flow characteristics at Hong Kong signalized crosswalk facilities.” Transportation, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 169–192, DOI: 10.1023/a:1014226416702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lam, W. H. K., Lee, J. Y. S., Lee, K. S., and Goh, P. K. (2003). “A generalised function for modeling bi-directional flow effects on indoor walkways in Hong Kong.” Transportation Research. Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp.789-810, DOI: 1016/s0965-8564(03)00058-2.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, J. Y. S., Goh, P. K., and Lam, W. H. K. (2005). “New level-ofservice standard for signalized crosswalks with bi-directional pedestrian flows.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 12, pp. 957–960, DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2005)131:12(957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, S. C. R. and Hughes, L. R. (2005). “Exploring trampling and crushing in a crowd.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 575–582, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947x(2005)131:8(575).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, J., Kim, T., Chung, J. H., and Kim, T. (2016). “Modeling lane formation in pedestrian counter flow and its effect on capacity.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 1099–1108, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0741-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma, Y., Yuen, K. K. R., and Lee, M. W. E. (2016). “Effective leadership for crowd evacuation.” Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, Vol. 450, pp. 333–341, DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.12.103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moussaïd, M., Helbing, D., and Theraulaza, G. (2011). “How simple rules determine pedestrian behaviour and crowd disasters.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 108, No. 17, pp. 6884–6888, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1016507108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sun, L. S., Hao, S. Y., and Qiu, S. (2016). “Impact of intersecting angles on oblique pedestrian streams.” Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington D.C., USA, [Accessed on September 21, 2017].Google Scholar
  23. Wang, J. H., Lo, S., and Wang, Q. S. (2013). “Risk of large-scale evacuation based on the effectiveness of rescue strategies under different crowd densities.” Risk Analysis, Vol. 33, No. 8, pp. 1553–1563, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01923.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiao, M. L, Chen, Y., and Yan, M. J. (2016). “Simulation of household evacuation in the 2014 Ludian earthquake.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 1757–1769, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-9887-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xie, S. Q., Hong, S. C., and La, W. H. K. (2013). “Development of a bidirectional pedestrian stream model with an oblique intersecting angle.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 7, pp. 678–685, DOI: 10.1061/(asce)te.1943-5436.0000555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang, J., Klingsch, W., Schadschneider, A., and Seyfried, A. (2011). “Transitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and T-junctions.” Statistics, Vol. 2011, No. 6, p. 06004, DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2011/06/p06004.Google Scholar
  27. Zhou, M., Wang, M., and Zhang, J. (2016). “How are risks generated, developed and amplified? Case study of the crowd collapse at Shanghai Bund on 31 December 2014.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 24, pp. 209–215, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou, W. K., Zhao, H., and Zhou, H. J. (2014). “The research of university dormitory fire evacuation based on AnyLogic simulation.” Fire Science & Technology, Vol. 12, pp. 1383–1386, DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2014.12.008. (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manman Chen
    • 1
  • Jinghong Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Youran Zhi
    • 2
  • Jinhua Sun
    • 3
  1. 1.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban and Industrial Safety, College of Safety Science and EngineeringNanjing Tech UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.College of Mechanical EngineeringNanjing Institute of TechnologyNanjingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Fire ScienceUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations