Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 2175–2187 | Cite as

The Effects of Amount and Location of Openings on Lateral Behavior of Masonry Infilled RC Frames

  • Elshan AhaniEmail author
  • Mir Naghi Mousavi
  • Ali Ahani
  • Mohammad Kheirollahi
Structural Engineering
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Many design codes didn’t consider masonry infills as structural elements inside moment resisting frames. Therefore, their presence is not assumed in analysis and design process. While, in real they could affect strength, energy dissipation, ductility, stiffness and many other features of moment frames. The presence of masonry infills could also change the reaction of frames exposed to lateral loads like earthquake and wind. This issue becomes more important if the built frame was placed in seismically active region. In current study, the effects of opening location by placing openings in 3 different places and its percentage was evaluated. To this purpose an experimental scaled model was constructed and subjected to cyclic loading. Thereafter, by using simplified micromodeling, numerical modeling performed for extending studies. Subsequently, sensitivity analyses were done to survey the effects of opening ratio on the lateral behavior of intermediate RC moment frames. Analytical results indicate that the openings which were lo20cated at upper corner of the masonry infills will loss more strength. In all of the numerical specimens by increase in opening percentage the lateral strength was decreased. The lateral strength was negligible for infills with greater than 40% openings.

Keywords

opening location opening percentage intermediate moment frame micro modeling masonry infill nonlinear static analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbasnejadfard, M. and Farzam, M. (2016). “The effect of opening on stiffness and strength of infilled steel frames.” Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 78–90, DOI: 10.22075/JRCE.2016.494.Google Scholar
  2. ACI (2014). Building code requirements for structure concrete, ACI 318–14, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahani, E., Mousavi, M. N., Rafezy, B., and Osmanzadeh, F. (2019). “Effects of central opening in masonry infill on lateral behavior of intermediate RC frames.” Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 23–42, DOI: 10.1520/ACEM20180040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AISC (2016). Code of standard practice for steel buildings and bridges, ANSI/AISC 303–16, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Akhoundi, F., Lourenço, P. B., and Vasconcelos, G. (2016). “Numerically based proposals for the stiffness and strength of masonry infills with openings in reinforced concrete frames.” International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 45, No. 6, pp. 869–891, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2688.Google Scholar
  6. Alam, M. S., Nehdi, M., and Amanat, K. M. (2009) “Modelling and analysis of retrofitted and un-retrofitted masonry-infilled RC frames under in-plane lateral loading.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 71–90, DOI: 10.1080/15732470600856262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BHRC (2005). Iranian code of practice for seismic resistance design of buildings, Standard 2800–05, 3rd Edition, BHRC Publication No. S-253, Building & Housing Research Center, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
  8. CEN (2004a). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004, European Committee for Standardization, Brussel, Belgium.Google Scholar
  9. CEN (2004b). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, BS EN 1998-1:2004, European Committee for Standardization, Brussel, Belgium.Google Scholar
  10. Crisafulli, F. J. (1997). Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills, PhD Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  11. CSA (2015). Design of masonry structures, CSA S304-14, Canadian Standards, Halifax, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. FEMA (1998). Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings, FEMA 306, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Furukawa, A., Kiyono, J., and Toki, K. (2012). “Numerical simulation of the failure propagation of masonry buildings during an earthquake.” Journal of Natural Disaster Science, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 11–36, DOI: 10.2328/jnds.33.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Issue No. 120 (2003). “Iranian Concrete Code (ABA)”, Iranian Management Organization, 6th Edition, Tehran, Iran.Google Scholar
  15. Krawinkler, H. (1992). Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures, ATC-24, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Mehrabi, A. B. and Shing, P. B. (1997). “Finite element modeling of masonry-infilled RC frames.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 123, No. 5, pp. 0604–0613, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(604).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehrabi, A. B., Shing, P. B., Schuller, M., and Noland, J. (1994). Performance of masonry-infilled R/C frames under in-plane lateral loads, Rep. CU/SR-94/6, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  18. NZS (2006). Concrete structures standard - The design of concrete structures, NZS 3101.1, New Zealand Standards, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  19. Perrone, D., Leone, M., and Aiello, M. A. (2017). “Non-linear behaviour of masonry infilled RC frames: Influence of masonry mechanical properties.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 150, pp. 875–891, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pina-Henriques, J. and Lourenco, P. B. (2006). “Masonry compression: A numerical investigation at the meso-level.” Engineering Computations, Vol 23, No. 4, pp. 382–407, DOI: 10.1108/02644400610661163.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarhosis, V., Tsavdaridis, K. D., and Giannopoulos, I. (2014). “Discrete element modeling (DEM) for masonry infilled steel frames with multiple window openings subjected to lateral load variations.” Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 93–103, DOI: 10.2174/1874836801408010093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sigmund, V. and Penava, D. (2013). “Assessment of masonry infilled reinforced-concrete frames with openings.” Tehnicki Vjesnik, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 459–466.Google Scholar
  23. Šipoša, T. K., Rodrigues, H., and Grubišića, M. (2018). “Simple design of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames for earthquake resistance.” Engineering Structures, In Press, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.072.Google Scholar
  24. Stavridis, A. (2009). Analytical and experimental study of seismic performance of reinforced concrete frames infilled with masonry walls, PhD Thesis, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Syrmakezis, C. A. and Asteris P. G. (2001). “Influence of infilled walls with openings to seismic response of plane frames.” Proc. 9th Canadian Masonry Symposium, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Tekeli, H. and Aydin, A. (2017). “An experimental study on the seismic behavior of infilled RC frames with opening.” Scientia Iranica, DOI: 10.24200/sci.2017.4150.Google Scholar
  27. Yáñez, F., Astroza, M., Holmberg, A., and Ogaz, O. (2004). “Behavior of confined masonry shear walls with large openings.” Proc. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Zhai, C., Wang, X., Kong, J., Li, S., and Xie, L. (2017). “Numerical simulation of masonry-infilled RC frames using XFEM.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 143, No. 10, p. 04017144, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang, B. (2006). Parametric study on the influence of infills on the displacement capacity of RC frames for earthquake loss estimation, MSc Thesis, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elshan Ahani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mir Naghi Mousavi
    • 2
  • Ali Ahani
    • 3
  • Mohammad Kheirollahi
    • 4
  1. 1.University College of Nabi Akram (UCNA)TabrizIran
  2. 2.LPA Co.TabrizIran
  3. 3.Dept. of Civil Structural EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  4. 4.Dept. of Civil Structural EngineeringSahand University of TechnologyTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations