Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity-Based Model Updating of Building Frames using Modal Test Data

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Model updating is of significant importance in the actual analyses of real structures. The differences between experimental and numerical dynamic characteristics can be minimized by means of this procedure. This procedure can be carried out using two approaches, namely, the manual model updating and the global or local automated model updating. The local model updating is a convenient tool for all kind of structures capable of minimizing the differences mentioned previously nearly to zero and also of identifying the damage locations and monitoring structural integrity. In this way, current realistic behavior of structures can be represented by updated finite element models. This paper describes a Reinforced Concrete (RC) frame model, its ambient vibration testing, finite element modeling and sensitivity-based automated model updating. The RC frame is of ½ geometric scale with two floors and two bays in the longitudinal direction. It was built and then subjected to ambient vibration tests to determine experimentally their dynamic characteristics. Additionally, the finite element computer program ANSYS was used to determine its initial numerical dynamic characteristics. The experimental and numerical results were compared resulting in maximum differences of 38.38% between them. To minimize these differences, the finite element model was updated using the global and local automated approach using a sensitivity-based analyses with some uncertain parameters. The differences were finally reduced to 4.4% and 0.21% by the global and the local automated model updatings, respectively. It is concluded that sensitivity-based automated updating is a very effective procedure to obtain the updated finite element model which can reflect the current behavior of a structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altunisik, A. C., Adanur, S., Genç, A. F, Günaydin, M., and Okur, F. Y. (2016). “Non-destructive testing of an ancient masonry bastion.” Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 22, pp. 1049–1054, DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunisik, A. C., Bayraktar, A., Sevim, B., and Özdemir, H. (2011). “Experimental and analytical system identification of Eynel Arch Type Steel Highway Bridge.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 67, No. 12, pp. 1912–1921, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSYS (2015). Swanson Analysis System, Pennsylvania, USA.

  • DDS (2016). Dynamic Design Solutions, FEMtools Model Updating Theoretical Manual, Version 3.8., Leuven, Belgium.

  • Deinum, P. J., Dungar, R., Ellis, B. R., Jeary, A. P., Reed, G. A. L., and Severn, R. T. (1982). “Vibration tests on Emosson arch dam in Switzerland.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 447–470, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290100308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, C. and Saisi, A. (2007). “Ambient vibration testing of historic masonry tower for structural identification and damage assessment.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1311–1321, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, C. and Saisi, A. (2011). “Ambient vibration testing and condition assessment of the Paderno iron arch bridge (1889).” Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 3709–3720, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.019.

  • Hong, Y., Pu, Q., Wang, Y., Chen, L., Gou, H., and Li, X. (2017). “Model-updating with experimental frequency response function considering general damping.” Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 82–92, DOI: 10.1177/1369433217706782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, H. A., Millas, E., Kusanovic, D., and Papadimitriou, C. (2014). “Model-reduction techniques for Bayesian finite element model updating using dynamic response data.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 279, pp. 301–324, DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.06.032.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kodikara, K., Chan, T. H. T., Nguyen, T., and Thambiratnam, D. P. (2016). “Model updating of real structures with ambient vibration data.” Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 6, pp. 329–341, DOI: 10.1007/s13349-016-0178-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacanna, G., Ripepe, M., Marchetti, E., Coli, M., and Garzonio, C. A. (2016). “Dynamic response of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Florence, Italy, based on ambient vibration test.” Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 20, pp. 632–640, DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2016.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, H. F., Peng, H. Y., and Au, S. K. (2014). “Development of a practical algorithm for Bayesian model updating of a coupled slab system utilizing field test data.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 79, pp. 182–194, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, C. H. and Wu, T. S. (1996). “Identification of Fei-Tsui arch dam from both ambient and seismic response data.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 15, pp. 465–483, DOI: 10.1016/0267-7261(96)00016-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasser, F., Li, Z., Gueguen, P., and Martin, N. (2016). “Frequency and damping ratio assessment of high-rise buildings using an automated model-based approach applied to real-world ambient vibration recordings.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 75, pp. 196–208, DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nour, A., Cherfaoui, A., Gocevski, V., and Léger, P. (2016). “Probabilistic seismic safety assessment of a CANDU 6 nuclear power plant including ambient vibration tests: Case study.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 304, pp. 125–138, DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OMA (2006). Operational Modal Analysis, Release 4.0, Structural Vibration Solution A/S, Denmark, 2006.

  • Osmancikli, G., Bayraktar, A., Türker, T., Uçak, S., and Mosallam, A. (2015). “Finite element model calibration of precast structures using ambient vibrations.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 93, pp. 10–21, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedram, M. and Esfandiari, A. (2017). “Frequency domain damage detection of plate and shell structures by finite element model updating.” Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 100–132, DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2017.1309398.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, O. W. and Oiseth, O. (2017). “Sensitivity-based finite element model updating of a pontoon bridge.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 150, pp. 573–584, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PULSE (2006). Analyzers and Solutions, Release 11.2. Bruel and Kjaer, Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S, Denmark.

  • Russo, S. (2016). “Integrated assessment of monumental structures through ambient vibrations and ND tests: The case of Rialto Bridge.” Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 19, pp. 402–414, DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2016.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanayei, M. and Rohela P. (2014). “Automated finite element model updating of full-scale structures with parameter identification system (PARIS).” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 67, pp. 99–110, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanayei, M., Khaloo, A., Gul, M., and Catbas, F. N. (2015). “Automated finite element model updating of a scale bridge model using measured static and modal test data.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 102, pp. 66–79, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A., and Altunisik A. C. (2011a). “Finite element model calibration of Berke Arch Dam using operational modal testing.” Journal of Vibration and Control, Vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 1065–79, DOI: 10.1177/1077546310377912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A. C., Atamturktur, S., and Birinci, F. (2011b). “Finite element model calibration effects on the earthquake response of masonry arch bridges.” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 47, pp. 621–634, DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2010.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolnik, D., Yu, E., Wallace, J., and Taciroglu, E. (2007). “Modal system identification and finite element model updating of a 15–story building using earthquake and ambient vibration data.” Structural Enginnering Institue, ASCE, May 16–19, California, USA, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Yousefianmoghadam, S., Mohammadi, M. E., Moaveni, B., Stavridis, A., and Wood, R. L. (2017). “An application of finite element model updating for damage assessment of a two-story reinforced concrete building and comparison with lidar.” Structural Health Monitoring, pp. 1–22, DOI: 10.1177/1475921717737970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H. and Büyüköztürk, O. (2016). “Probabilistic updating of building models using incomplete modal data.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 75, pp. 27–40, DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.12.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura, C. E., Lord, J. F., and Simpson, R. D. (2002). “Effective use of ambient vibration measurements for modal updating of a 48 storey building in Vancouver, Canada.” In International Conference on Structural Dynamics Modelling-Test, Analysis, Correlation and Validation, Instituto de Engenharia Mecanica, Madeira Island, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Hill, T. L., Neild, S. A, Shaw, A. D., Khodaparast, H. H., and Friswell, M. I (2018). “Model updating strategy for structures with localized nonlinearities using frequency response measurements.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 100, pp. 940–961, DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. R. and Li, Q. S. (2004). “Finite element model updating for a high-rise structure based on ambient vibration measurements.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 26, pp. 979–990, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Can Altunişik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altunişik, A.C., Karahasan, O.Ş., Genç, A.F. et al. Sensitivity-Based Model Updating of Building Frames using Modal Test Data. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 4038–4046 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1601-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1601-6

Keywords

Navigation