KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 2055–2063 | Cite as

The Performance of Controlled Low-strength Material Base Supporting a High-volume Asphalt Pavement

  • Thanakorn Chompoorat
  • Suched Likitlersuang
  • Pitcha Jongvivatsakul
Mechanistic Evaluation of Asphalt Paving Materials and Structures
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

A lack of proper base and subbase materials in pavement construction is one of the common problems in the tropical region worldwide. In many countries such as Thailand, cementitious materials are usually used for ground improvement. Controlled Lowstrength Material (CLSM) was considered in this study as a pavement base material. The CLSM mixes were prepared by varying cement, fly ash and fine aggregate content. Each mixed component was studied for their physical and chemical properties. After mixing, properties of the CLSM were investigated based on the standard testing of fresh concrete and cement-treated base material. The flowability, setting time and bleeding were checked to ensure that the CLSM were self-compacting. The mechanical properties of hardened CLSM were determined by means of CBR, unconfined compressive strength and resilient modulus tests. The resilient modulus results were used in the analytical design of flexible pavement with CLSM base. The critical traffic data under high-volume road collected by the Thailand Department of Highway was adopted in this study. Results show that the CLSM base considerably increased the performance as well as design life of asphalt pavement compared with the conventional crush rock base pavement.

Keywords

CLSM fly ash unconfined compressive strength resilient modulus design life 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AASHTO T307 (2007). Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soil and aggregate materials, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  2. Achtemichuk, S., Hubbard, J., Sluce, R., and Shehata, M. H. (2009). “The utilization of recycled concrete aggregate to produce controlled low-strength materials without using Portland cement.” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 564–569, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ACI Committee 229 (1999). Controlled low strength materials (ACI 229R), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hill, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Asphalt Institute (1991). Thickness design: Asphalt pavements for highways and streets, Manual Sesies No. 1 (MS-1), Lexington, Kentucky, USA.Google Scholar
  5. ASTM Designation C 231 (2017). Standard test method for air content of freshly mixed concrete by the pressure method, Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/C0231_C0231M-17A.Google Scholar
  6. ASTM Designation C 232 (2014). Standard test methods for bleeding of concrete, Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/C0232_C0232M.Google Scholar
  7. ASTM Designation C 403 (2016). Standard test method for time of setting of concrete mixtures by penetration resistance, Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/C0403_C0403M-16.Google Scholar
  8. ASTM Designation C 939 (2016). Standard test method for flow of grout for preplaced-aggregate concrete (flow cone method), Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/C0939_C0939M-16A.Google Scholar
  9. ASTM Designation C 1611 (2014). Standard test method for slump flow of self-consolidating concrete, Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/C1611_C1611M-14.Google Scholar
  10. ASTM Designation D 1883 (2016). Standard test method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils, Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/D1883-16.Google Scholar
  11. ASTM Designation D 2166 (2016). Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil, Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/D2166_D2166M-16.Google Scholar
  12. ASTM Designation D 4832 (2010). Standard test method for preparation and testing of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) test cylinders, Philadelphia, USA, DOI: 10.1520/D4832-16.Google Scholar
  13. Bamrungpong, W., Chuejedton, N., Likitlersuang, S., Jongvivatsakul, P., and Chompoorat, T. (2017). “A study of properties of controlled low–strength material made from fly ash utilized as pavement base material.” Engineering Journal of Research and Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 15–26 (In Thai).Google Scholar
  14. Chindaprasirt, P., Jaturapitakkul, C., and Sinsiri, T. (2005). “Effect of fly ash fineness on compressive strength and pore size of blended cement paste.” Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 27, pp. 425–428, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chompoorat, T. and Likitlersuang, S. (2015). “Laboratory investigation of hot mix asphalt behaviour for mechanistic-empirical pavement design in tropical countries.” Geotechnical Engineering Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 37–44.Google Scholar
  16. Chompoorat, T. (2012). “Dynamic properties of cement treated clay.” The Seventh Asian Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference (7AYGEC), Tokushima, Japan, pp. 273–279.Google Scholar
  17. Department of Highways (2001). Analytical design of new flexible pavements in Thailand, Pavement Technology Project, Department of Highways, Thailand.Google Scholar
  18. Do, T. M., Kim, Y., and Dang, M. Q. (2017). “Influence of curing conditions on engineering properties of controlled low strength material made with cementless binder.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1774–1782, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-0731-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EFNARC (2002). Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete: Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Gabr, M. A. and Bowders, J. J. (2000). “Controlled low-strength material using fly ash and AMD sludge.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 76, Nos. 2–3, pp. 251–263, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(00) 00202-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta, A., Kumar, P., and Rastogi, R. (2014). “Mechanistic–empirical approach for design of low volume pavements.” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 797–808, DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2014.960999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heukelom, W. and Klomp, A. J. G. (1962). “Dynamic testing as a means of controlling pavements during and after construction.” International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 667–679.Google Scholar
  23. Horpibulsuk, S., Rachan, R., Suddeepong, A., and Chinkulkijniwat, A. (2011). “Assessment of strength development in blended cement admixed Bangkok clay.” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, pp. 1521–1531, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  25. Jongpradist, P., Jumlongrach, N., Youwai, S., and Chucheepsakul, S. (2010). “Influence of fly ash on unconfined compressive strength of cement-admixed clay at high water content.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 49–58, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) 0899-1561(2010)22:1(49).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz, A. and Kovler, K. (2004). “Utilization of industrial by-products for the production of Controlled Low Strength Materials (CLSM).” Waste Management, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 501–512, DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00026-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim, D. and Kim, J. R. (2007). “Resilient behavior of compacted subgrade soils under the repeated triaxial test.” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1470–1479, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, Y., Do, T. M., Kim, H., and Kang, G. (2016). “Utilization of excavated soil in coal ash-based Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM).” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 124, pp. 598–605, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuo, W. T., Wang, H. Y., Shu, C. Y., and Su, D. S. (2013). “Engineering properties of controlled low-strength materials containing waste oyster shells.” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 46, pp. 128–133, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Likitlersuang, S. and Chompoorat, T. (2016). “Laboratory investigation of the performances of cement and fly ash modified asphalt concrete mixtures.” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 337–344, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. May, R. W. and Witczak, M. W. (1981). “Effective granular modulus to model pavement response.” Transportation Research Record, No. 810, Transportation Research Board, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  32. Miren, E., Javier, A., Eugenia, P. M., and Alain, G. (2013). “Use of recycled fine aggregates for Control Low Strength Materials (CLSMs) production.” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 44, pp. 142–148, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muniandy, R., Aburkaba, E. E., and Thamer, N. (2013). “Comparison of flexible pavement performance using Kenlayer and Chev PC software program.” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 112–119.Google Scholar
  34. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) (2000). Unbound materials characterization utilizing LTPP Data, Unpublished Interim Task Report Project 1-37A, Development of the 2002 Design Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, National Research Council, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  35. Pedarla, A., Puppala, A. J., Savigamin, C., and Yu, X. (2015). “Performance of sand-treated clay subgrade supporting a low-volume flexible pavement.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2473, pp. 91–97, DOI: 10.3141/2473-11.Google Scholar
  36. Puppala, A. J., Hoyos, L. R., and Potturi, A. K. (2011). “Resilient moduli response of moderately cement-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 990–998, DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Selvi, P. (2015). “Fatigue and rutting strain analysis on lime stabilized subgrades to develop a pavement design chart.” Transportation Geotechnics, vol. 2, pp. 20–29, DOI: 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Taesiri, Y. and Jitareekul, P. (2002). An engineering manual highway pavement design, Training on Sustainable Road Development, Road and Pavement Design Branch Department of Highways, Thailand.Google Scholar
  39. Wang, H. Y. and Chen, K. W. (2016). “A study of the engineering properties of CLSM with a new type of slag.” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 102, pp. 422–427, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015. 10.198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wen, H., Muhunthan, B., Wang, J., Li, X., Edil, T., and Tinjum, J. M. (2014). Characterization of cementitiously stabilized layers for use in pavement design and analysis (NCHRP Report No. 789), Washington, D.C.: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu, H., Huang, B., Shu, X., and Yin, J. (2016). “Utilization of solid wastes/by products from paper mills in Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM).” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 118, pp. 155–163, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thanakorn Chompoorat
    • 1
  • Suched Likitlersuang
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pitcha Jongvivatsakul
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. of Civil Engineering, School of EngineeringUniversity of PhayaoPhayaoThailand
  2. 2.Geotechnical Research Unit, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Transportation InstituteChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Innovative Construction Materials Research Unit, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations