Analytical and Numerical Investigation of Overstrength Factors for Very Short Shear Links in EBFs

Structural Engineering
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Shear links are key components in the Eccentrically Braced Frames (EBFs) that act as a structural fuse by dissipating seismic energy during severe earthquakes. Specification AISC 341, which is frequently used in the seismic design of steel structures, prescribes a constant overstrength factor of 1.50 for shear links. However, a few existing experimental results indicated that the overstrength of very short shear links with length ratio lower than 1.0 are much greater than required. In this paper, five basic factors influencing the overstrength of very short shear links are summarized as follows: web-ultimate-to-yield-shear-strength ratio, length-to-stiffener-spacing ratio, flange-to-web-area ratio, flange-to-web-strength ratio, length-to-depth ratio. A numerical investigation with a detailed Finite Element (FE) model, verified by a comparison with existing experimental results, is conducted to investigate the combined effects of these five basic factors on the overstrength of very short shear links. Then, a new numerical model for predicting the overstrength value is proposed based on the FE analysis results and existing available experimental data by using the numerical fitting method, and it shows good agreement.

Keywords

Eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) very short shear links overstrength factor finite element analysis numerical model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AISC 341 (2010). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Azad, S. K. and Topkaya, C. (2017). “A review of research on steel eccentrically braced frames.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 128, pp. 53–73, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.07.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corte, G. D., Aniello, M. D., and Landolfo, R. (2013). “Analytical and numerical study of plastic overstrength of shear links.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 19–32, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.11.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dusicka, P., Itani, A. M., and Buckle I.-G. (2010). “Cyclic behavior of shear links of various grades of plate steel.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 370–378, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.00001 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. GB 50010 (2010). Code for seismic design of buildings Beijing, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  6. Hu, S. J. and Wang, Z. (2014). “Study of an optimum design method for links.” Open Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 335–343, DOI: 10.2174/187414950140 8010335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu, S. J. and Wang, Z. (2015). “Influence of flange width-thickness ratio on behavior of links.” Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), Vol. 46, No. 9, pp. 3405–3414, DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2015.09.033.Google Scholar
  8. Ji, X. D., Wang, Y. D., Ma, Q.F., and Okazaki, T. (2015). “Cyclic behavior of very short steel shear links.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 142, No. 2, pp. 04015114–1-10, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) ST.1943-541X.0001375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kanvinde, A. M., Marshall, K. S., Grilli, D., and Bomba, G. (2014). “Forensic analysis of link fractures in eccentrically braced frames during the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake: Testing and simulation.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 141, No. 5, pp. 04014146–1-15, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kasai, K. and Popov, E. P. (1986). “Cyclic web buckling control of shear link beams.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 505–523, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:3(505).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McDaniel, C. C., Uang, C. M., and Seible, F. (2003). “Cyclic testing of built-up steel shear links for the new bay bridge.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 801–809, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445 (2003)129:6(80).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mohebkhah, A. and Chegeni, B. (2014). “Overstrength and rotation capacity for EBF links made of European IPE sections.” Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 74, pp. 255–260, DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Okazaki, T. and Engelhardt, M. D. (2007). “Cyclic loading behavior of EBF links constructed of ASTM A992 steel.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 751–765, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Richards, P. W. and Uang, C. M. (2005). “Effect of flange widththickness ratio on eccentrically braced frames link cyclic rotation capacity.” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 10, pp. 1546–1552, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:10(1546).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shi, Y. J., Wang, M., and Wang, Y. Q. (2011). “Experimental and constitutive model study of structural steel under cyclic loading.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 67, No. 8, pp. 1185–1197, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shujun Hu
    • 1
  • Jingang Xiong
    • 1
  • Qiang Zhou
    • 1
  • Zhibin Lin
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureNanchang UniversityNanchangChina
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil EngineeringNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations