Abstract
The objective of this paper is the investigation of the influence of the seismic incident angle on the response values of symmetric in plan buildings subjected to bi-directional horizontal ground motion. Firstly, a set of symmetric buildings is studied by means of linear response history analysis. The maximum response values over all incident angles are determined using well established analytical formulae. It is demonstrated that for symmetric buildings possessing equal stiffness along two orthogonal horizontal axes the maximum value of some vectorial response quantities (resultant displacements, resultant moments of some columns) does not depend on the orientation of the seismic action. On the contrary, the seismic incident angle is essential for the rest response quantities of such buildings, as well as for all the response quantities of symmetric buildings with different stiffness along the two structural axes. In addition, the same buildings are analyzed by means of non-linear response history analysis, with seismic components having several different orientations with regard to the structural axes. Similar conclusions are derived for the nonlinear range of behaviour too.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amiri, J. V., Ahmadi, O. Y., and Ganjavi, B. (2008). “Assessment of reinforced concrete buildings with shear wall based on Iranian Seismic Code (Third edition).” J. Appl. Sci., Vol. 8, No. 23, pp. 4274–4283, DOI: 10.3923/jas.2008.4274.4283.
Anastasiadis, K. (1993). “Directions sismiques défavorables et combinaisons défavorables des efforts.” Ann I T B T P, Vol. 512, pp. 83–99.
Anastasiadis, K., Avramidis, I., and Panetsos, P. (2002). “Concurrent design forces in structures under three-component orthotropic seismic excitation.” Earthq. Spectra, Vol. 18, pp. 1–17, DOI: 10.1193/1.1463040.
Arjmandi, K., Estekanchi, H., and Vafai, A. (2009). “Correlation between structural performance levels and damage indexes in steel frames subjected to earthquakes.” Scientia Iranica Transaction a-Civil Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 147–155.
American Society of Civil Engineers (2008). ASCE/SEI 41-06, Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, Reston, Virginia.
Athanatopoulou, A. M. (2005). “Critical orientation of three correlated seismic components.” Eng. Struct., Vol. 27, pp. 301–312, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.10.011.
Athanatopoulou, A. M. and Avramidis, I. E. (2006). “Effects of seismic directivity on structural response.” Proc., Second FIB Congress, Naples, Italy.
Athanatopoulou, A. M., Tsourekas, A., and Papamanolis, G. (2005). “Variation of response with incident angle under two horizontal correlated seismic components.” Proc., Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures V, Skiathos, Greece.
Carr, A. J. (2004). Ruaumoko–a Program for Inelastic Time-History Analysis, Program manual, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Dimova, S. L. and Negro, P. (2005). “Seismic assessment of an industrial frame structure designed according to Eurocodes. Part 2: Capacity and vulnerability.” Eng. Struct., Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 724–735, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.009.
Elenas, A. (2000). “Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., Vol. 20, Nos. 1-4, pp. 93–100, DOI: 10.1016/S0267-7261(00)00041-5.
European Committee for Standardization (2004). Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Brussels.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2004). FEMA 440, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, Washington DC.
Fontara, I-K.M., Kostinakis, K. G., Manoukas, G. E., and Athanatopoulou, A. M. (2015). “Parameters affecting the seismic response of buildings under bi-directional excitation.” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 957–979, DOI: 10.12989/sem.2015.53.5.957.
Kostinakis, K. G., Athanatopoulou, A. M., and Avramidis, I. E. (2008). “Maximum response and critical incident angle in special classes of buildings subjected to two horizontal seismic components.” Proc., 6th GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics, Thessaloniki, Greece, paper No. 1108.
Kumar, N. K. and Gajjar, R. K. (2013). “Non-linear response of twoway asymmetric multistorey building under biaxial excitation.” Internatl J. Eng. Tech., Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 1162–1168.
Kunnath, S. K., Reinhorn, A. M., and Lobo, R. F. (1992). IDARC Version 3: A Program for the Inelastic Damage Analysis of RC Structures, Technical Report NCEER-92-0022, National Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo NY,USA.
Lopez, O. A., Chopra, A. K., and Hernadez, J. J. (2000). “Critical response of structures to multicomponent earthquake excitation.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 29, pp. 1759–1778, DOI: 10.1002/1096-9845 (200012)29:12<1759::AID-EQE984>3.0.CO;2-K.
Lopez, O. A., Chopra, A. K., and Hernadez, J. J. (2001). “Evaluation of combination rules for maximum response calculation in multicomponent seismic analysis.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 30, pp. 1379–1398, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.68.
Lopez, O. A. and Torres, R. (1997). “The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 26, pp. 881–894, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845 (199709)26:9<881::AID-EQE674>3.0.CO;2-R.
Lucchini, A., Monti, G., and Kunnath, S. (2011). “Nonlinear response of two-way asymmetric single-story building under biaxial excitation.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 137, No. 1, pp. 34–40, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000266.
MacRae, G. A. and Mattheis, J. (2000). “Three dimensional steel building response to near-fault motions.” J. Struct. Eng. -ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 117–26, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1 (117).
Menun, C. and Der Kiureghian, A. (1998). “A replacement for the 30%, 40% and SRSS rules for multicomponent seismic analysis.” Earthq. Spectra, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 153–163, DOI: 10.1193/1.1585993.
Menun, C. and Der Kiureghian A. (2000a). “Envelopes for seismic response vectors. I: Theory.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 126, pp. 467–473, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(467)
Menun, C. and Der Kiureghian A. (2000b). “Envelopes for seismic response vectors. II: Application.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 126, pp. 474–481, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(474).
Nguyen, V. T and Kim, D. (2013). “Influence of incident angles of earthquakes on inelastic responses of asymmetric-plan structures.” Struct. Eng. Mech., Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 373–389, DOI: 10.12989/sem.2013.45.3.373.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (PEER). (2003). Strong Motion Database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/.
Park, Y. J. and Ang, A. H.-S. (1985). “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced-concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 111, No. 4, pp. 722–739, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722).
Park, Y. J., Ang, A.H.-S. and Wen, Y. K. (1987). “Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings.” Earthq. Spectra, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1–26, DOI: 10.1193/1.1585416.
Penzien, J. and Watabe, M. (1975). “Characteristics of 3-D earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 3, pp. 365–373, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290030407.
Quadri, S. A. and Madhuri, N. M. (2014). “of R.C.C. frames.” Internatl J. Civ. Eng. Tech., Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 10–15.
Rigato, A. B. and Medina, R. A. (2007). “Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions.” Eng. Struct., Vol. 29, pp. 2593–2601, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.008.
Smeby, W. and Der Kiureghian, A. (1985). “Modal combination rules for multi-component earthquake excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 13, pp. 1–12.
Williams, M. S. and Sexsmith, R. G. (1997). “Seismic assessment of concrete bridges using inelastic damage analysis.” Eng. Struct., Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 208–216, DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00104-6.
Yüksel, E. and Sürmeli, M. (2010). “Failure analysis of one-story precast structures for near-fault and far-fault strong ground motions.” Bull. Earthq. Eng., Vol. 8, pp. 937–953, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9164-z.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kostinakis, K.G., Manoukas, G.E. & Athanatopoulou, A.M. Influence of seismic incident angle on response of symmetric in plan buildings. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 725–735 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1279-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1279-1