Skip to main content
Log in

Reinforcement efficiency of bearing capacity with geocell shape and filling materials

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To establish a standard for geocell reinforcement techniques, the aim of this paper was to analyze reinforcement efficiency and behavior as geocell dimensions and filling materials. Based on the result, the reinforcement of bearing capacity and stress distribution effect of the subgrade soil according to the increase of loading was analyzed in terms of the height, width, and shape of the geocell, as well as the types of filling materials. An evaluation of the bearing capacity based on a large-scale model test suggested that, with the maximum reinforcement, the ultimate bearing capacity increases by four to eight times in comparison to non-reinforced ground, while the largest ultimate bearing capacity is shown in 1:1.2 (width: height) when the geocell shape is filled with gravel and in 1:0.8 (width: height) when filled with weathered granite soil. Also, in reinforced ground, the maximum earth pressure decreases by 50% to 60% in comparison to unreinforced ground, due to the distribution of the lower stress due to the shallow foundation of the geocellreinforced layer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bathurst, R. J. and Jarrett, P. M. (1989). “Large-scale model tests of geocomposite mattresses over peat subgrades.” Transportation Research Record (No. 1188).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst, R. J. and Karpurapu, R. (1993). “Large scale triaxial compression testing of geocell reinforced granular soils.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 296–303, DOI: 10.1520/GTJ10050J.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash, S. K., Krishnaswamy, N. R., and Rajagopal, K. (2007). “Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 905–916, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2014-0387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. C. (2002). A Study on the bearing capacity of shallow foundation reinforced by geocell, Ph.D. Thesis, Kyung Hee University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokharel, S. K., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R. L., and IzharHalahmi (2010). “Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 570–578, DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, H. and Wen, X. (2008). “Model studies on geogrid or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 26, Issue 3, pp. 231–238, DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.10.002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeong Jun Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, E.C., Kang, H.H. & Park, J.J. Reinforcement efficiency of bearing capacity with geocell shape and filling materials. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1648–1656 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1649-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1649-0

Keywords

Navigation