Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic dozer productivity estimation method

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper presents the Stochastic Dozer Productivity Estimation (SDPE) method. It integrates dozer production estimating curves and equipment specification obtained from manufacturers, defines the probability density functions (PDFs) of job condition correction factors, executes the dozer productivity estimating format (DPEF) for the user-defined number of iterations, and estimates the best-fit PDFs of productivity and that of total owning and operating (O&O) cost. The method also improves the reliability of the existing DPEF by effectively dealing with the uncertainties of the job condition correction factors and handling the variability of the productivity and O&O cost. Thus, this method allows an earthwork manager to quantify the risk involved in accepting the deterministic productivity and O&O cost computed by the existing DPEF. It simplifies the tedious and burdensome process involved in executing the DPEF and estimating the best-fit PDFs of productivity and O&O cost. The usability and validity of the system in practice were verified through test cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Android, inc. (a). (Accessed 2014). “Android package index.” 〈http://developer.android.com/reference/packages.html〉.

    Google Scholar 

  • Android, inc. (b). (Accessed 2014). “Android sensor overview.” 〈http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/sensors/sensors_overview.html〉.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, A. H-S. and Tang, W. H. (1975). Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Wiley, New York, N.Y., Vol. 1, DOI: 10.2307/2987875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A. (1992). “Probability, statistics, and queuing theory with computer science applications.” Technometrics, Taylor & Francis, Oxfordshire, U.K., Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 240–241, DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1992.10484935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdett, R., Kozan, E., and Kenley, R. (2015). “Block models for improved earthwork allocation planning in linear infrastructure construction.” Engineering Optimization, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 347–369, DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2014.892594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caterpillar, Inc. (2010). Caterpillar performance handbook. 40th ed., Caterpillar, Peoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazouni, A. (2009). “Heuristic method for multi-project finance-based scheduling.” Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 199–211, DOI: 10.1080/01446190802673110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flood, I. and Christophilos, P. (1996). “Modeling construction processes using artificial neural networks.” Automation in construction, Elsevier, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 307–320, DOI: 10.1016/0926-5805(95)00011-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. (2010). “Productivity analysis comparison of different types of earthmoving operations by means of various productivity measurements.” Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, JSTAGE, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 185–192, DOI: 10.3130/jaabe.9.185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. W., Lee, S. Y., and Halpin, D. W. (2005). “Productivity evaluation of the conventional and GPS-based earthmoving systems using construction simulation.” Construction Research Congress, ASCE, pp. 178–182, DOI: 10.1061/40754(183)35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, W. L., Koch, V. R., and Lucet, Y. (2011). “Models and algorithms to improve earthwork operations in road design using mixed integer linear programming.” European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Vol. 215, No. 2, pp. 470–480, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.06.011.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, P. G. (1962). Introduction to mathematical statistics. 3nd ed., Wiley, New York, N.Y., DOI:10.1002/bimj.19670090111.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kecojevic, V. J. and Mrugala, M. J. (2003). “Estimation of dozer production and costs.” International Journal of Surface Mining, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 171–182, DOI:10.1076/ijsm.17.3.171.14771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khisty, C. J. and Mohammadi, J. (2001). Fundamentals of systems engineering: with economics, probability, and statistics, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klanfar, M., Kujundžić, T., and Vrkljan, D. (2014). “Calculation analysis of bulldozer’s productivity in gravitational transport on open pits.” Tehnički vjesnik/Technical Gazette, Researchgate, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambropoulos, S., Manolopoulos, N., and Pantouvakis, J. P. (1996). “SEMANTIC: Smart earthmoving analysis and estimation of cost.” Construction Management & Economics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 79–92, DOI: 10.1080/014461996373539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.-E. and Arditi, D. (2006). “Automated statistical analysis in stochastic project scheduling simulation.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 3, pp. 268–277, DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:3(268).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeker, Q. Q. and Escobar, A. L. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. 1st ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar, K. and Hosny, O. (2012). “Solving the least-cost route cut and fill sequencing problem using particle swarm.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 138, No. 8, pp. 931–942, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ok, S. C. and Sinha, S. K. (2006). “Construction equipment productivity estimation using artificial neural network model.” Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp. 1029–1044, DOI: 10.1080/01446190600851033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parente, M., Correia, A. G., and Cortez, P. (2015). “Modern optimization in earthwork construction.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, Vol. 164, No. 6, pp. 421–432, DOI: 10.1680/ecsmge.60678.vol2.031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peurifoy, R. L., Schexnayder, C. J., and Shapira, A. (2006) Construction planning, equipment, and methods. 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing, Academic Press, San Diego, DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1998.10485491.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Eun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, Y.J., Gwak, H.S., Kim, B.S. et al. Stochastic dozer productivity estimation method. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1573–1580 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1596-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1596-9

Keywords

Navigation