Skip to main content
Log in

A new approach to system reliability analysis of offshore structures using dominant failure modes identified by selective searching technique

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The reliability analysis of offshore structures, as conceived by current design practice, is typically carried out at the component level with an implicit assumption that the structural system will be safe as long as all its members are safe according to the corresponding limit state equations. However, it is widely accepted that a more general and rigorous approach to the risk assessment of offshore structures based on system reliability analysis is needed, in which the reliability of a structure is estimated with respect to the system-level failure caused by potential failure modes consisting of component failures with their statistical dependence considered. To this end, the merits of a new risk assessment framework, originally developed for truss and frame structures, are investigated in this paper in view of an extensive application of this method to the offshore structural systems. The main advantage of the proposed method is that the identification process of dominant failure modes is decoupled from the evaluation process of the probabilities of failure modes and the system failure event. The identification phase consists of a multi-point parallel search employing a genetic algorithm, and it is followed by the evaluation phase, which performs a multi-scale matrix-based system reliability analysis where the statistical dependence among both components and failure modes is fully considered. In order to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method to the offshore field, the problem of a jacket platform under an extreme sea state is considered, in which the uncertainties are assumed both in the wave and hydrodynamic models and in the material properties of the structural members. The computational efficiency and accuracy of the proposed approach are successfully demonstrated through comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • API RP2A-LRFD (1993). Recommended practice for planning and constructing fixed offshore platforms, load and resistance factor, (1st ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B. C., Balakrishnan, N., and Nagaraja, H. N. (1992). A First course in order statistics, New York: John Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • ASAS User Manual (2010).Version 13.0. ANSYS, Inc. Southpointe 275 Technology Drive Canonsburg, PA15317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala-Uraga, E. and Moan, T. (2002, July). System reliability issues of offshore structures considering fatigue failure and updating based on inspection, Paper presented at the 1st International ASRANet Colloquium, Glasgow, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccotti, P. (2000). Wave mechanics for ocean engineering, Elsevier Oceanography Series.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bomel Ltd. (2002). System-based calibration of north-west European Annex Environmental Load Factors to ISO Fixed Structures Code 19902, Report No. C925\04\016R, Rev B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, S. K. (2005). Hanbook of offshore engineering, Elsevier Ocean Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, R. G. (1974). Evolution and development of water wave theories for engineering application, Vol. 1 and II.Fort Belvair, VA: Special Report No. 1, Coastal Engineering Research Center U.S. Army.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). “First-and second-order reliability methods”. In E. Nikolaidis, D. Ghiocel, & S. Singhal (Eds.). Engineering design reliability handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devroye, L. (1986). Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen, O. and Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability methods, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., and Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling extremal events for insurance and finance, New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, G. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guenard, Y. F. (1984). Application of System Reliability Analysis to Offshore Structures, Stanford, CA: Report No. 71: John Blume Earthq. Engng. Center, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, W. H., Lee, Y. J., Song, J., and Gencturk, B. (2012). “Further development of matrix-based system reliability method and applications to structural systems.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-cycle Design and Performance, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 441–57, DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2010.539060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamchandani, A. (1987). Structural system reliability analysis methods, Report no. 83. Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D.-S., Ok, S.-Y., Song, J., and Koh, H.-M. (2013). “System reliability analysis using dominant failure modes identified by selective searching technique.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 119, pp. 316–331, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S. and Nadarajah, S. (2000). Extreme Value Distributions: Theory and Applications, London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, N., Song, J., Kim, D.-S., and Ok, S.-Y. (2010, July). Multi-scale system reliability analysis of bridge structures using dominant failure modes identified by selective searching technique, Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS2010), Philadelphia, PA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. and Song, J. (2011). “Risk analysis of fatigue-induced sequential failures by branch-and-bound method employing system reliability bounds (B3 method).” ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 137, No. 12, pp. 807–21, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. and Song, J. (2012). “Finite-element-based system reliability analysis of fatigue-induced sequential failures.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 108, pp. 131–41, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H.-W. and Song, J. (2012). “Efficient risk assessment of lifeline networks under spatially correlated ground motions using selective recursive decomposition algorithm.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 13, pp. 1861–1882, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. K. (1967). Probabilistic theory of structural dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutes, L. D. and Sarkani, S. (2004). Random Vibrations: Analysis Of Structural and Mechanical Systems, Burlington MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, N. J., Beckman, R., and Conover, W. J. (1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting value of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, Vol. 21, pp. 239–45, DOI: 10.2307/1268522.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moan, T. (1994). Reliability and risk analysis for design and operations planning of offshore structures, Paper presented at the 6th ICOSSAR, Structural Safety and Reliability, (pp. 21–43). Balkema, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murotsu, Y., Okada, H., Taguchi, K., Grimmelt, M., and Yonezawa, M. (1984). “Automatic generation of stochastically dominant failure modes of frame structures.” Structural Safety, Vol. 2, pp. 17–25, DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(84)90004-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. J. (1969). A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems. New York: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2003). “Bounds on system reliability by linear programming.” Journal of Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 627–636, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:6(627).

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. and Kang, W. H. (2009). “System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method.” Structural Safety, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 148–156, DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. and Ok, S.-Y. (2010). “Multi-scale system reliability analysis of lifeline networks under earthquake hazards.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 259–279, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoft-Christensen, P. and Murotsu, Y. (1986). Application of structural systems reliability theory, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y.-L. and Moan, T. (1989). A Structural system reliability analysis of jacket using an improved truss model, Paper presented at the 5th ICOSSAR (pp. 887-894). San Francisco, New York: ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junho Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coccon, M.N., Song, J., Ok, SY. et al. A new approach to system reliability analysis of offshore structures using dominant failure modes identified by selective searching technique. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 2360–2372 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1192-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1192-z

Keywords

Navigation