Abstract
Bridges begin to deteriorate as soon as they are put into service. Effective bridge management requires sound understanding of the deterioration mechanism as well as the expected service life. Decision makers design and execute programs that safely maintain or extend bridge service life at low cost. Key maintenance practices include inspections, repairs, and rehabilitation, among which inspections may be the most important since the other maintenance interventions are conducted based on the inspection report. This paper presents a methodology for determining the expected service life of a bridge or a bridge network based on a deterministic condition-based model associated with inspection quality. This study used almost 10-year condition rating results of bridges and developed a non-linear regression model that takes into account the Inspection Reliability Index (IRI). The IRI represents the relative inspection accuracy with respect to a tolerable error of one grade by comparing condition ratings between routine and in-depth safety inspections. In the evaluation of the IRI, significant variability in condition ratings between routine and in-depth safety inspections was observed. Specifically, approximately 42% of routine inspection results deviated within ± 1.0 grade with respect to results from in-depth safety inspections. A modified non-linear regression model combined with the IRI is proposed to predict the remaining service life of a bridge. The proposed model can estimate the service life of a bridge by combining the bridge age and its condition rating.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO (2013). “Manual for bridge element inspection.” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C., U.S.
Adams, T. M., Pincheira, J. A., and Huang, Y.-H. (2002). Assessment and rehabilitation strategies/guidelines to maximize the service life of concrete structures, Wisconsin DOT, Madison, WI, U.S.
Agrawal, A. K., Kawaguchi, A., and Chen, Z. (2010). “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 419–429, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Chang, J. and Garvin, M. (2006). “A conceptual model of bridge service life.” Bridge Structures, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 107–116, DOI: 10.1080/15732480600892407.
Cho, D., Lee, M., Koh, C., Kim, Y., kim, H., Lee, U., Min, G., and Kim, G. (1999). Development and Application of Bridge Management System, Korea Expressway Corporation, Hwaseong, Korea.
Estes, A. C. and Frangopol, D. M. (2001). “Bridge lifetime system reliability under multiple limit states.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 523–528, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001) 6:6(523), 523-528.
FHWA (2004). “National bridge inspection standard.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., U.S.
FHWA (2012). “Bridge inspector’s reference manual.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation., Washington D.C., U.S.
Graybeal, B. A., Phares, B. M., Rolander, D. D., Moore, M., and Washer, G. (2002). “Visual inspection of highway bridges.” Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 67–83, DOI: 10.1023/A:1022508121821.
Hawk, H. (1999). “BRIDGIT: User-friendly approach to bridge management.” Transportation Research Circular, Vol. 498, No. 1.
Klatter, H. and Van Noortwijk, J. (2003). “Life-cycle cost approach to bridge management in the Netherlands.” Proc., Proceedings of the 9th International Bridge Management Conference, April 28-30, 2003, Orlando, Florida, USA, 179–188.
Lounis, Z., and Madanat, S. M. (2002). “Integrating mechanistic and statistical deterioration models for effective bridge management.” Proc., 7th ASCE International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation, pp. 513–520.
MOLIT (2012a). “Guideline of Safety Inspection and In-depth Safety Inspection for Structures.” Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Trasport, Seoul, Korea.
MOLIT (2012b). “Guideline and Commentary of Safety Inspection and In-depth Safety Inspection for Structures-Bridge.” Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Trasport, Seoul, Korea.
Moore, M. E., Phares, B. M., Graybeal, B. A., Rolander, D. D., and Washer, G. A. (2001). “Reliability of Visual Inspection of Highway Bridges.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation., Washington D.C.
Morcous, G. (2006). “Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 146–155, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:2(146).
Morcous, G. and Lounis, Z. (2007). “Probabilistic and mechanistic deterioration models for bridge management.” Computing in Civil Engineering, pp. 364–373, DOI: 10.1061/40937(261)45.
Patterson, W. D. O. (1987). Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management, Johns Hopkins University Press, Balimore.
Phares, B. M., Washer, G. A., Rolander, D. D., Graybeal, B. A., and Moore, M. (2004). “Routine highway bridge inspection condition documentation accuracy and reliability.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 403–413, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(403).
Rodriguez, M., Gkritza, K., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. (2005). “Factors affecting bridge deck deterioration in Indiana.” Proc., The 84th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board.
Roelfstra, G., Hajdin, R., Adey, B., and Brühwiler, E. (2004). “Condition evolution in bridge management systems and corrosion-induced deterioration.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 268–277, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:3(268).
Saito, M. and Sinha, K. C. (1989). “The development of optimal strategies for maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of highway bridges: volume 4: cost analysis.” Indiana Department of Transportation, West Lafayette, IN, U.S.
Sanders, D. H. and Zhang, Y. J. (1994). “Bridge detrioration models for states with small bridge inventories.” Transportation Research Record(1442), pp. 101–109.
Testa, R. B. and Yanev, B. S. (2002). “Bridge maintenance level assessment.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 358–367, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8667.00282.
Thompson, P. D., Ford, K. M., Arman, M. H. R., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., and Shirole, A. M. (2012a). “Estimating life expectancies of highway assets, volume 1: Guidebook, NCHRP Report 713.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation., Washington D.C., U.S.
Thompson, P. D., Ford, K. M., Arman, M. H. R., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., and Shirole, A. M. (2012b). “Estimating life expectancies of highway assets, volume 2: Final report, NCHRP Report 713.” Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C., U.S.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jeong, Y., Kim, W., Lee, I. et al. Bridge service life estimation considering inspection reliability. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1882–1893 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1042-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1042-z