Abstract
Lowest bidding is one of the bidding methods in which the party that bids at the lowest price is determined as the successful bidder. Although it was adopted for the purpose of strengthening and restructuring the construction industry while easing the regulations related to delivering public construction projects, the abolition of the lowest bidding system is under discussion as it is pointed out to be one of the major causes for deteriorating construction companies’ profitability. In order to overcome the limitations of inadequate reliability and representativeness of previous studies, this study has collected and analyzed numerous execution statements for public construction projects in order to understand the present condition related to whether a reasonable construction cost that is necessary for carrying out constructions is secured for the lowest bidding and what the problems are in execution of public construction projects. The average performance rate of projects ordered by lowest bidding was calculated at 104.8% through analysis of the execution statements for the public construction projects. In addition, this study analyzed the trend of change of performance rates in terms of contract amount, public owner types, and evaluation ranking of the contractor’s construction capability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, T. H. (2010). A study of process model for estimating optimal bidding rate in the lowest bidding system, MSc Thesis, Gyeong Sang National University (in Korean).
Al-Sinan, F. and Hancher, D. (1988). “Facility project delivery selection model.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 244–259, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:3(244).
Jarrell, D. A. and Skibniewski, M. J. (1988). “Cost comparison model for contracting out government services.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 260–271, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:3(260).
Jeon, S. W. (2010). A study on the effect of the expanding invitation of the Rock-bottom price knock-down system upon the Korean construction industry, MSc Thesis, Yonsei University (in Korean).
Kim, B. S. (2006). “The corresponding plan for integrated environment-the lowest cost bid and the current cost estimate system.” Journal of The Korean Society of Civil Engineers, KSCE, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 849–859 (in Korean), DOI: Prefix: 10.12652.
Kuprenas, J. A. and Nasr, E. B. (2007). “Cost performance comparison of two public sector project procurement techniques.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 114–121, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:3(114).
Lee, B. N., Lee, Y. H., and Chang, C. K. (2005). “Identifying factors causing bid-dropping in domestic public work projects and ways of ending its decline.” Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 102–109 (in Korean), DOI Prefix: 10.6106.
Lee, Y. H. and Gu, B. S. (2008). Lowest bid analysis and proposal of a construction site, Construction Issue Focus, Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea, 2008-15 (in Korean).
Mollaoglu-Korkmaz, S., Swarup, L., and Riley, D. (2013). “Delivering sustainable, high-performance buildings: Influence of project delivery methods on integration and project outcomes.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 71–78, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000114.
Ruparathna, R. and Hewage, K. (2015). “Review of contemporary construction procurement practices.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 31, No. 3, 04014038, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000279.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woo, S., Lee, S., Cho, CS. et al. Study on the issues of the lowest bidding through the analysis of working budget ratio of Korean construction companies. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1587–1594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0886-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0886-6