Skip to main content
Log in

Sustainable urban transportation strategies: Searching for synergies

  • Sustainable Urban Transportation System
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Sustainable urban transport is a straightforward concept in theory but still remains unresolved in practice. While there is overall consensus among researchers and institutions about the need for integrated transport strategies (May et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2006; Justen et al., 2014), there is still a lack of knowledge as to the policy measures required. This article is intended to contribute to an understanding of the way different measures interact when implemented together in terms of their synergies and complementarities. The methodological approach is a step-by-step process where measures are analysed first in isolation and then in combination, with the aim of providing a quantitative and comprehensive analysis of the effects and possible synergies between them. Each measure considers different geographical scales of implementation. The results are based on a transport model. The results highlight the need for policy packages that ensure higher success rates and cancel out the negative impacts of individual measures. They also show how measures can interact in different manners–from neutralizing negative impacts of another measure to reinforcing each other its positive effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, A., Monzon, A., and Cascajo, R. (2014). “Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities.” Ecological Indicators, Vol. 48, pp. 578–592, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind. 2014.09.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armelius, H. and Hultkrantz, L. (2006). “The politico-economic link between public transport and road pricing: An ex-ante study of the Stockholm road-pricing trial.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 162–172, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D. and Marshall, S. (2000). Encouraging transport alternatives: good practice in reducing travel, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister, D. (2008). “The sustainable mobility paradigm.” Transport Policy, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 73–80, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, R., Listokin, D., and Galley, C. C. (2000). Smart growth: More than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon, Housing Policy Debate II, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey (821-879).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997). “Travel demand and the 3D's: Density, diversity and design.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 199–219, DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CTM (2004). Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid Memoria anual 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • CTM (2006). Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid, Encuesta domiciliaria de movilidad en día laborable 2004, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (2001). “What does “smart growth” really mean?.” Planning, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2000). TERM report 2000: Are we moving in the right direction? Indicators on transport and environment integration in the EU, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, January 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, J., Hulkrantz, L., Nerhagen, L., and Smidfelt Rosqvist, L. (2009). “The Stockholm congestion-charging trial 2006: Overview of effects.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 240–250, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.007.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2005). Thematic strategy on the urban environment, COM (2005) 718.

  • European Commission (EC) (2007a). Green paper on urban environment: Towards a new culture for urban mobility, COM (2007) 551.

  • European Commission (EC) (2007b). Sustainable urban transport plans, Preparatory Document in Relation to the Follow-up of the Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment.

  • European Environment Agency (EEA) (2006). Urban sprawl in europe, The Ignored Challenge, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  • Feitelson, E. (2009). Policy packaging: Why and how, invited presentation, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, 23rd October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlert, T., Nielsen, O., Rich, A., and Schlag, J. (2008). “Publicacceptability change of urban road pricing.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers -Transport, Vol. 161, No. 3, 2008, pp. 111–122, DOI: 10.1680/tran.2008.161.3.111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D., and Feitelson, E. (2013). “From policy measures to policy packages.” Transport Reviews, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 1–20, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2012.744779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, J. and Garcia-Palomares, J. C. (2007). “New spatial patterns of mobility within the metropolitan area of Madrid: Towards more complex and dispersed flow network.” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 18–30, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justen, A., Fearnley, N., Givoni, M., and Macmillen, J. (2014). “A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 60, pp. 9–18, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013. 10.016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1924). “Some fallacies in the interpretation of social costs.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 582–606, DOI: 10.2307/1884592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoflacher, H. (2007). “Success and failures in urban transport planning in Europe-understanding the transport system.” Sadhana, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 293–307, DOI: 10.1007/s12046-007-0026-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, F., Islas, J., and Macías, P. (2011). “Model for evaluating the environmental sustainability of energy projects.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 931–944, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D., Kelly, C., and Shepherd, S. (2006). “The principles of integration in urban transport strategies.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 319–327, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, A. D. and Marsden, G. (2010). Urban transport and mobility, Document produced as background for the 2010 International Transport Forum on Transport and Innovation: Unleashing the Potential, Leipzig, Germany, 26-28 May 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayeres, I., Proost, S., Emberger, G., Grant-Muller, S., Kelly, C., and May, A. D. (2003). Deliverable D4: Synergies and Conflicts of Transport Packages, SPECTRUM (Study of Policies regarding Economic instruments Complementing Transport Regulation and the Understanding of physical Measures) Leeds, Institute for Transport Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, D. (2004). “Travel time constraints in transport policy.” Transport, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering, Vol. 157, No. 2, pp. 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Transport (1964). Road pricing: The economic and technical Possibilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzon, A. and Hoz, D. (2009). Efectos sobre la movilidad dinámica territorial de Madrid. Urban, No. 14, pp 58–71, Departamento de Urbanística y Ordenación del Territorio, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzon, A. and Guerrero, M. J. (2004). “Valuation of social and health effects of transport-related air pollution in Madrid (Spain).” Science of the Total Environment, 334-335, pp. 427–434, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.069.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEEDS (2011). “NEEDS project: New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability.” 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission, 2004-2009, Final report, http://www.needs-project.org. Accessed in September 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, J., Pochet, P., and Poimboeuf, H. (2003). “Towards sustainable mobility indicators: Application to the Lyo s conurbation.” Transport Policym, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 197–208, DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00021-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OPTIC (2009). “Optimal policies for transport in combination.” 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission, 2009-2011. http://www.optic.toi.no/(Accessed in September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortúzar, J. D. and Willumsen, L. G. (1994). Modelling transport, Wiley, England. ISBN 047194193X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, A., Lindsey, R., and Proost, S. (2006). “Research challenges in modelling urban road pricing: An overview.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 97–105, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare, Library of Economics and Liberty.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROSPECTS (2000). “Optimal sustainable planning of european city transport systems.” 5th Framework Programme of the European Commission. 2000-2003, http://www.transport-research.info/web/projects/project_details.cfm?id=4344) (Accessed in June 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupprecht Consult (2005). Sustainable Urban Transport Plans (SUTP) and urban environment: Policies, effects, and simulations, Review of European References Regarding Noise, Air Quality and CO2 Emissions, Final report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, M., Robuste, F., and Sauri, S. (2009). “Impact of two-part pricing scheme on social welfare for congested metropolitan expressway networks.” Transportation Research Record, No. 2115, pp. 102–109. DOI: 10.3141/2115-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schade, J. and Schlag, B. (2003). “Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 45–61, DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00046-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., and Dieleman, F. M. (2004). “Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: the Netherlands experience.” Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 579–603, DOI: 10.1080/0042098042000178690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, S. P., Zhang, X., Emberger, G., Hudson, M., May, A. D., and Paulley, N. (2006). “Designing optimal urban transport strategies: The role of individual policy instruments and the impact of financial constraints.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 49–65, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMILE (2010). SMILE project: Guidelines for road traffic noise abatement, European Commission “LIFE-Environment” research programme. LIFE00 ENV/F/000640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taeihagh, A., Givoni, M., and Bañares-Alcantara, R. (2013). “Which policy first? A network-centric approach for the analysis and ranking of policy measures.” Environment and Planning Part B, Vol. 40, pp. 595–616, DOI: 10.1068/b38058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization) (2000). World health report 2000, Health Systems: Improving Performance.

  • Zahavi, Y. (1980). “Regularities in travel time and money expenditures.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 750, pp. 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Paulley, N., Hudson, M., and Rhys-Tyler, G. (2006). “A method for the design of optimal strategies.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, pp. 329–338, DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.006. www.ctm-madrid.es (Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Valdes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valdes, C., Monzon, A. & Benitez, F.G. Sustainable urban transportation strategies: Searching for synergies. KSCE J Civ Eng 20, 1066–1075 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0685-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0685-0

Keywords

Navigation