Abstract
Sustainable urban transport is a straightforward concept in theory but still remains unresolved in practice. While there is overall consensus among researchers and institutions about the need for integrated transport strategies (May et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2006; Justen et al., 2014), there is still a lack of knowledge as to the policy measures required. This article is intended to contribute to an understanding of the way different measures interact when implemented together in terms of their synergies and complementarities. The methodological approach is a step-by-step process where measures are analysed first in isolation and then in combination, with the aim of providing a quantitative and comprehensive analysis of the effects and possible synergies between them. Each measure considers different geographical scales of implementation. The results are based on a transport model. The results highlight the need for policy packages that ensure higher success rates and cancel out the negative impacts of individual measures. They also show how measures can interact in different manners–from neutralizing negative impacts of another measure to reinforcing each other its positive effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso, A., Monzon, A., and Cascajo, R. (2014). “Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities.” Ecological Indicators, Vol. 48, pp. 578–592, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind. 2014.09.022.
Armelius, H. and Hultkrantz, L. (2006). “The politico-economic link between public transport and road pricing: An ex-ante study of the Stockholm road-pricing trial.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 162–172, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.011.
Banister, D. and Marshall, S. (2000). Encouraging transport alternatives: good practice in reducing travel, The Stationery Office, London.
Banister, D. (2008). “The sustainable mobility paradigm.” Transport Policy, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 73–80, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
Burchell, R., Listokin, D., and Galley, C. C. (2000). Smart growth: More than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon, Housing Policy Debate II, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey (821-879).
Cervero, R. and Kockelman, K. (1997). “Travel demand and the 3D's: Density, diversity and design.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 199–219, DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
CTM (2004). Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid Memoria anual 2004.
CTM (2006). Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid, Encuesta domiciliaria de movilidad en día laborable 2004, 2006.
Downs, A. (2001). “What does “smart growth” really mean?.” Planning, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 20–25.
EEA (2000). TERM report 2000: Are we moving in the right direction? Indicators on transport and environment integration in the EU, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, January 2000.
Eliasson, J., Hulkrantz, L., Nerhagen, L., and Smidfelt Rosqvist, L. (2009). “The Stockholm congestion-charging trial 2006: Overview of effects.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 240–250, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.007.
European Commission (EC) (2005). Thematic strategy on the urban environment, COM (2005) 718.
European Commission (EC) (2007a). Green paper on urban environment: Towards a new culture for urban mobility, COM (2007) 551.
European Commission (EC) (2007b). Sustainable urban transport plans, Preparatory Document in Relation to the Follow-up of the Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment.
European Environment Agency (EEA) (2006). Urban sprawl in europe, The Ignored Challenge, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Feitelson, E. (2009). Policy packaging: Why and how, invited presentation, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, 23rd October.
Gehlert, T., Nielsen, O., Rich, A., and Schlag, J. (2008). “Publicacceptability change of urban road pricing.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers -Transport, Vol. 161, No. 3, 2008, pp. 111–122, DOI: 10.1680/tran.2008.161.3.111.
Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D., and Feitelson, E. (2013). “From policy measures to policy packages.” Transport Reviews, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 1–20, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2012.744779.
Gutierrez, J. and Garcia-Palomares, J. C. (2007). “New spatial patterns of mobility within the metropolitan area of Madrid: Towards more complex and dispersed flow network.” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 18–30, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.01.002.
Justen, A., Fearnley, N., Givoni, M., and Macmillen, J. (2014). “A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 60, pp. 9–18, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013. 10.016.
Knight, F. H. (1924). “Some fallacies in the interpretation of social costs.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 582–606, DOI: 10.2307/1884592.
Knoflacher, H. (2007). “Success and failures in urban transport planning in Europe-understanding the transport system.” Sadhana, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 293–307, DOI: 10.1007/s12046-007-0026-6.
Manzini, F., Islas, J., and Macías, P. (2011). “Model for evaluating the environmental sustainability of energy projects.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 931–944, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.01.012.
May, A. D., Kelly, C., and Shepherd, S. (2006). “The principles of integration in urban transport strategies.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 319–327, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.005.
May, A. D. and Marsden, G. (2010). Urban transport and mobility, Document produced as background for the 2010 International Transport Forum on Transport and Innovation: Unleashing the Potential, Leipzig, Germany, 26-28 May 2010.
Mayeres, I., Proost, S., Emberger, G., Grant-Muller, S., Kelly, C., and May, A. D. (2003). Deliverable D4: Synergies and Conflicts of Transport Packages, SPECTRUM (Study of Policies regarding Economic instruments Complementing Transport Regulation and the Understanding of physical Measures) Leeds, Institute for Transport Studies.
Metz, D. (2004). “Travel time constraints in transport policy.” Transport, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering, Vol. 157, No. 2, pp. 99–105.
Ministry of Transport (1964). Road pricing: The economic and technical Possibilities.
Monzon, A. and Hoz, D. (2009). Efectos sobre la movilidad dinámica territorial de Madrid. Urban, No. 14, pp 58–71, Departamento de Urbanística y Ordenación del Territorio, Madrid.
Monzon, A. and Guerrero, M. J. (2004). “Valuation of social and health effects of transport-related air pollution in Madrid (Spain).” Science of the Total Environment, 334-335, pp. 427–434, DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.069.
NEEDS (2011). “NEEDS project: New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability.” 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission, 2004-2009, Final report, http://www.needs-project.org. Accessed in September 2011.
Nicolas, J., Pochet, P., and Poimboeuf, H. (2003). “Towards sustainable mobility indicators: Application to the Lyo s conurbation.” Transport Policym, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 197–208, DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00021-0.
OPTIC (2009). “Optimal policies for transport in combination.” 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission, 2009-2011. http://www.optic.toi.no/(Accessed in September 2013).
Ortúzar, J. D. and Willumsen, L. G. (1994). Modelling transport, Wiley, England. ISBN 047194193X.
Palma, A., Lindsey, R., and Proost, S. (2006). “Research challenges in modelling urban road pricing: An overview.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 97–105, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.006.
Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare, Library of Economics and Liberty.
PROSPECTS (2000). “Optimal sustainable planning of european city transport systems.” 5th Framework Programme of the European Commission. 2000-2003, http://www.transport-research.info/web/projects/project_details.cfm?id=4344) (Accessed in June 2011).
Rupprecht Consult (2005). Sustainable Urban Transport Plans (SUTP) and urban environment: Policies, effects, and simulations, Review of European References Regarding Noise, Air Quality and CO2 Emissions, Final report.
Salas, M., Robuste, F., and Sauri, S. (2009). “Impact of two-part pricing scheme on social welfare for congested metropolitan expressway networks.” Transportation Research Record, No. 2115, pp. 102–109. DOI: 10.3141/2115-13.
Schade, J. and Schlag, B. (2003). “Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 45–61, DOI: 10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00046-3.
Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., and Dieleman, F. M. (2004). “Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: the Netherlands experience.” Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 579–603, DOI: 10.1080/0042098042000178690.
Shepherd, S. P., Zhang, X., Emberger, G., Hudson, M., May, A. D., and Paulley, N. (2006). “Designing optimal urban transport strategies: The role of individual policy instruments and the impact of financial constraints.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 49–65, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.08.002.
SMILE (2010). SMILE project: Guidelines for road traffic noise abatement, European Commission “LIFE-Environment” research programme. LIFE00 ENV/F/000640.
Taeihagh, A., Givoni, M., and Bañares-Alcantara, R. (2013). “Which policy first? A network-centric approach for the analysis and ranking of policy measures.” Environment and Planning Part B, Vol. 40, pp. 595–616, DOI: 10.1068/b38058.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2000). World health report 2000, Health Systems: Improving Performance.
Zahavi, Y. (1980). “Regularities in travel time and money expenditures.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 750, pp. 13–19.
Zhang, X., Paulley, N., Hudson, M., and Rhys-Tyler, G. (2006). “A method for the design of optimal strategies.” Transport Policy, Vol. 13, pp. 329–338, DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.006. www.ctm-madrid.es (Consorcio de Transportes de Madrid).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valdes, C., Monzon, A. & Benitez, F.G. Sustainable urban transportation strategies: Searching for synergies. KSCE J Civ Eng 20, 1066–1075 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0685-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0685-0