Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 679–686 | Cite as

Worth of the three dimensional simulations of seepage in the vicinity of heading-up structures

  • Mohamed A. GadEmail author
  • Doaa Anas
  • Nahla A. Atta
  • Ghada Samy
Geotechnical Engineering

Abstract

This paper evaluates the three dimensional effects in studying seepage in the vicinity of heading up structures. An artificial heading-up structure installed on pervious soil is studied using both a 3D model (Seep3D) and a vertical 2D model (SEEP2D). The uplifts under the apron and the exit gradients resulting from both models are compared for different structure configurations including the presence and lack of sheetpiles for both laterally homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions. In addition, the effects of downstream wing walls (guide walls) on seepage are also assessed. The results showed that the exit gradient in the 3D simulations can reach almost double its value in the 2D simulations in different configurations. The existence of downstream guide walls can also lead to significant increase in the exit gradient. The paper proves that studying seepage in 3D can significantly become critical over the traditional 2D approach especially in cases of significant lateral heterogeneity.

Keywords

seepage SEEP2D SEEP3D heading-up structures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afzali E. S. and Barani G. A. (2013). “Application of SEEP 3D software in modelling the effects of cutoff walls on the reduction of the seepage pressure and exit hydraulic gradient under hydraulic structure.” Scientific Information Database, Vol. 5, No. 15, pp. 79–90.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed A. A. and Bazaraa, A. S. (2009). “Three-dimensional analysis of seepage below and around hydraulic structures.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 243–247, DOI:  10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:3(243).Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed A. A. (2011). “Design of hydraulic structures considering different sheetpile configurations and flow through canal banks.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 559–565, DOI:  10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baseghi B. and Desai, C. S. (1990). “Laboratory verification of the residual flow procedure for three dimensional free surface flow.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 259–272, DOI:  10.1029/WR026i002p00259.Google Scholar
  5. El-Molla A. M. (2001). “New trends for evaluating the percolation length under aprons of hydraulic structures provided with cutoff and founded on isotropic soil.” Civil Engineering Research Magazine (CERM), Faculty of Engineering, Al Azhar University, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 183–198.Google Scholar
  6. Fredlund D. G. and Rahardjo H. (1993). Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils, John Wiley & Sons, New York, DOI:  10.1002/9780470172759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guerra P., Priestley, D., and Fredlund, M. (2012). “3D Groundwater seepage analysis of a levee intersection.” Canadian Dam Association (CDA) Annual Conference.Google Scholar
  8. Koltuk S. and Iyisan, R. (2013). “Numerical analysis of groundwater flow through a rectangular cofferdam.” Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (EJGE), Vol. 18.Google Scholar
  9. Mobasher A. M. (2005). Efficiency of cutoffs under aprons of irrigation structures, MSc Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Al Azhar University, Egypt, Cairo.Google Scholar
  10. Money R. L. (2006). “Comparison of 2D and 3D Seepage model results for excavation near levee toe.” GeoCongress, Geotechnical Engineering in the Information Technology Age Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), DOI:  10.1061/40803(187)245.Google Scholar
  11. Ozkan S. (2003). Analytical study on flood induced seepage under river levees, PhD Dissertation, Louisiana State University, The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Record ID: oai:etd.lsu.edu:etd-0403103–111134.Google Scholar
  12. SEEP2D Primer (1998). Brigham young University, Engineering Computer Graphics Laboratory.Google Scholar
  13. Seep3D User Guide (2002). GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Soleimanbeigi, A. and Jafarzadeh, F. (2005). “3D steady state seepage analysis of embankment Dams.” Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (EJGE), Vol. 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed A. Gad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Doaa Anas
    • 1
  • Nahla A. Atta
    • 1
  • Ghada Samy
    • 1
  1. 1.Irrigation and Hydraulics Laboratory, Civil Engineering Dept., Faculty of EngineeringAin-Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations