Skip to main content

Measurement of desirable minimum one-way bike lane width

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering volume 20, pages 881–889 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Although many countries specify a desirable minimum width for one-way bike lanes, there have been no empirical or methodological studies conducted through extensive field experiments to confirm these specifications. This study devised a measurement method to obtain precise bicycle trajectories using a real-time kinematic global positioning system (RTK GPS). This measurement method achieves very satisfactory accuracy with regard to identifying the desirable minimum bike lane width when considering the bicycle width, Essential Maneuvering Space (EMS), and Comfortable Lateral Clearance (CLC). The width of a bicycle was obtained by investigating common bicycle types in the field. The EMS experiments were performed for speeds of 10, 20, and 30 km/h along test tracks with widths of 1.1, 2.0, and 3.0 m using an RTK GPS. The CLC experiments were repeated 300 times with the same preset speeds as in the EMS tests. Based on the results of this study, the bike lane width should be at least 2.0 m to allow for rider stability on roadways with no curb or gutter. In the future, desirable geometric standards for various types of bike lanes need to be formulated using real data collected with advanced measurement apparatuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • AASHTO (2012). Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, Task Force on Geometric Design, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T., Bredal, F., Weinreich, M., Jensen, N., Riisgaard-Dam, M., and Nielsen, M. K. (2012). Collection of cycle concepts 2012, Cycling Embassy of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austroads (1999). Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austroads (2005). The australian national cycling strategy 2005–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Transportation (2006). Highway design manual (HDM), Caltrans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certu (2007). Recommendations for cycle facilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cycling Centre of Excellence (2005). London cycling design standards: A guide to the design of a better cycling environment, Transport for London (TfL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, J. (2009). “Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure.” Journal of Public Health Policy, pp. 95–110, DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2008.56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, K., Schalkwyk, I., and Layton, R. (2009). “Balancing urban driveway design demands based on stopping sight distance.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board 2120, pp. 18–27, DOI: 10.3141/2120-03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagnant, D. J. and Kockelman, K. (2014). “A direct-demand model for bicycle counts: The impacts of level of service and other factors.” Paper Presented at the 93 rd Transportation Research Board Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • HCM (2010). Highway capacity manual, Transportation Research Board of the National Academics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. P., Wu, S. K., and Kim, H. K. (2006). “Practical procedure to collect arterial travel time data using GPS-Instrumented test vehicles.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board 1978, pp. 160–168, DOI: 10.3141/1978-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. W., Pein, W. E., and Stutts, J. C. (1995). “Bicycle-motor vehicle crash types: The early 1990s.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board 1502, pp. 65–74, ISBN: 0309061644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. D. (1996). Understanding GPS: Principles and applications, Artech House, Norwood, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Lee, J., and Kim, H. (2010). “Effect of visible light transmission from vehicle windows on traffic flow of car-following.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board 2188, pp. 156–164, DOI: 10.3141/2188-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H. and Ko, E. J. (2014). “Relationships between Neighbourhood Environments and Residents’ Bicycle Mode Choice: A Case Study of Seoul.” International Journal of Urban Sciences, pp. 383–395, DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2014.957715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Wang, W., Shan, X., Jin, J., Lu, J., and Yang, C. (2010). Analysis of bicycle passing events for los evaluation on physically separated bicycle roadways in China, Paper Presented at the 89th Transportation Research Board Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orden, H., and Rojo, M. (2010). Applying road safety audits to bikeways, Paper Presented at the 89th Transportation Research Board Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCHRP Report 766 (2014). Recommended bicycle lane widths for various roadway characteristics, Transportation Research Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, C., Lee, J., Choi, J., Park, H., Park, D., and Kim, H. (1999). On the Institution Standards of Bikeway, Paper Presented at the 35th Korea Society of Transportation Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringwood, J. V. and Feng, R. (2007). Bicycle wheel wobble: A case study in dynamics, ICINCO 2007. 4th International Conference on Information in Control, Automation and Robotics, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roads and Traffic Authority (2005). NSW bicycle guidelines, Roads and Traffic Authority NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTA (2005). Designing for bicycle riders and pedestrians, Participant Guide.

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Center for Bicycling & Walking (2002). Vermont pedestrian and bicycle facility planning and design manual, Prepared for the Vermont Agency of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transit New Zealand (2008). New zealand supplement to the austroads guide to traffic engineering practice part 14: Bicycles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., and Nihan, N. L. (2004). “Estimating the risk of collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles at signalized intersections.” In Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 3, Elsevier, pp. 313–321, DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00009-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_diet. accessed Sep. 20, 2012.

  • Wisconsin Department of Transportation (2004). Wisconsin bicycle facility design handbook.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-744, Korea

    Chungwon Lee

  2. Korea Transport Institute, Koyang, 411-701, Korea

    Hee Cheol Shin

  3. School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 136-713, Korea

    Seungmo Kang

  4. Daejeon Development Institute, Daejeon, 301-763, Korea

    Jung-Beom Lee

Authors
  1. Chungwon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hee Cheol Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Seungmo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jung-Beom Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung-Beom Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, C., Shin, H.C., Kang, S. et al. Measurement of desirable minimum one-way bike lane width. KSCE J Civ Eng 20, 881–889 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0467-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0467-0

Keywords

  • Bicycle
  • Bike lane
  • Width
  • GPS
  • Safety
  • Stability