Abstract
Irrigation projects realized in Turkey are completely financed by the state through internal funds or foreign credits. Private construction companies deliver these projects under the management of State Hydraulic Works, which is a state foundation responsible for managing the country’s water resources. Decisions related to irrigation projects in Turkey are important because of their effect on the agricultural development and high amounts allocated from national budget for their implementation. Exploring the best design among various alternatives at the design development stage is a serious and challenging process that determines the course and success level of irrigation projects. In this regard, this case study introduces a risk assessment procedure experienced in State Hydraulic Works during the design development stage to determine the best design alternative in an irrigation project. Furthermore, the case study includes crucial remarks about another project under construction on which neither State Hydraulic Works nor the contractor company has so far executed risk assessment. While useful decisions were taken associated with design alternatives in the former project, various problems occurred in the latter one during construction because of not applying risk assessment during design development stage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
California Department of Transportation (CDT) (2007). Project risk management handbook, Sacramento, California.
Chapman, C. and Ward, S. (2006). Project risk management: Process, techniques and insights, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.
Devlet Su İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü (DSI) (General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works). (2013}). <http://www.dsi.gov.tr/> (March 2, 2013)
Devlet Su İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü (DSI). (2013a). Documents of aydin kocarli bagarasi irrigation project design Job, General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, Turkey.
Devlet Su İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü (DSI). (2013b). Documents of bafra plain left coast irrigation project construction Job, General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, Turkey.
Dikmen, İ., Birgönül, M. T., and Arıkan, A. E. (2004). “A critical review of risk management support tools.” Proc. ARCOM 2004, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Heriot Watt Univ., U.K., Vol. 2, 1145–1154.
Edwards, L. (1995). Practical risk management in the construction industry, Thomas Telford, London.
Flanagan, R., and Norman, G. (1993). Risk management and construction, Backwell Scientific, Cambridge.
Gündoğdu, H. (2013). Water resources and irrigation development in Turkey, ICID news — First Quarter, International Commission on Irrigation & Drainage (ICID), New Delhi, India.
Ökmen, Ö. and Özta, A. (2008). “Construction project network evaluation with correlated schedule risk analysis model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 130–136, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:1(49).
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2004). A guide to project management body of knowledge: PMBOK Guide, Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania.
Zou, P. X. W., Chen, Y., and Chan, T.-Y. (2010). “Understanding and improving your risk management capability: Assessment model for construction organizations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., Vol. 136, No. 8, pp. 854–863, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000175.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ökmen, Ö. Risk assessment for determining best design alternative in a state-owned irrigation project in Turkey. KSCE J Civ Eng 20, 109–120 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0397-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0397-x