Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between static nonlinear and time history analysis using flexibility-based model for an existing structure and effect of taking into account soil using Domain Reduction Method for a single media

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work is divided into two parts; the first one presents the nonlinear methods of analyses for seismic design of structures. The first method is the nonlinear pushover procedure, which is based on the N2 method. The second method is the classical nonlinear time history analysis. The objective of this paper is to make a comparative study of an existing reinforced concrete building in Bonefro, Italy between static nonlinear analysis and time history analysis using flexibility-based finite element, and the sensitivity of the time history analyses to the seismic parameters. The second part presents an elegant method called Domain Reduction Method, which takes into account a small adjacent part of subsoil including structure. With this way the size of the problem to be solved is substantially reduced. All this through Z_Soil; engineering software based on the finite-element method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004). “Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non adaptive force-based pushover procedures.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 497–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydinoglu, M. N. (2004). An improved pushover procedure for engineering practice: Incremental Response Spectrum Analysis (IRSA), International Workshop on Performance-based seismic design. Concepts and Implementation, Bled, Slovenia, June 28-July 1, In Press by Pacific Earthquake Research Center, PEER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgasmia, M. and Moussaoui, S. (2013). “Comparaison of static pushover analysis in the case of small and large deformation with time history analysis using flexibility-based model for an existing structure.” International Journal of Current Engineering and Technologie, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 655–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgasmia, M., Spacone, E., Urbanski, A., and Zimmermann, Th. (2007). Seismic evaluation of constructions: Static pushover procedure and time history analysis for nonlinear frames, LSC Internal Report, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. M. (1964). Introduction in structural dynamic, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciampi, V. and Carlesimo, L. (1986). “A nonlinear beam element for seismic analysis of structures.” Proceedings of 8th European. Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Command, S. (2013). “Pushover analysis with zsoil taking soil into account.” Numerics in Geotechnics and Structures Symposium, 28 Years of Zsoil and Structure PC, Swiszerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, J. P., Barbato, M., and Spacone, E. (2004). “Finite element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 59, Issue 13, pp. 1781–1820.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocode 8 (2003). Design of structures for earthquake resistance, european committee for standardization, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar, P. (1999). “Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 979–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar, P. (2002). “Structural analysis in earthquake engineering — A breakthrough of simplified non-linear methods.” Proceedings of 12 th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar, P., Kilar, V., Marusic, D., and Perus, I. (2005). “The extension of the n2 method to asymmetric buildings.” Proceedings of the 4th European Workshop on the Seismic Behaviour of Irregular and Complex Structures, No. 41, Thessaloniki, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas, G. (2006). Seismic design of foundation and soil-structure interaction, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Swiszerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmstad, K. D. and Taciroglu, E. (2002). “Mixed methods and flexibility approaches for nonlinear frame analysis.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 58, Nos. 5–8, pp. 967–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaba, S. and Mahin, S. A. (1984). “Refined modeling of reinforced concrete columns for seismic analysis.” EERC Report 84/03, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuenhofer, A. and Filippou, F. (1998). “Geometrically nonlinear flexibilitybased frame finite element.” Journal of Structure Engineering. Vol. 124, No. 6, pp. 704–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynders, E. and Roeck, G. (2010). “A local Flexibility Method for Vibration-Based Damage Localization and Quantification.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 329, No. 12, pp. 2367–2383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabetta, F. and Pugliese, A. (1996). “Estimation of response spectra and simulation of non stationary earthquake ground motions.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spacone, E. (1994). Flexibility-based finite element models for the nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of concrete frame structures, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spacone, E., Filippou, F. C., and Taucer, F. F. (1996). “Fiber beamcolumn model for nonlinear analysis of R/C frames. I: Formulation, II: Applications.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 711–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taucer, F. F., Spacone, E., and Filippou, F. C. (1991). A fiber beamcolumn element for seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete structures, EERC Report 91/17, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbaski, A., Spacone, E., Belgasmia, M., Sarf, J. L., and Zimmermann, Th. (2007). Static pushover analysis in Z_Soil.PC & related EUROCODE 8 regulations, Report 070202 Zace Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valipour, H. R. and Foster, S. J. (2010). “A total secant flexibility-based formulation for frame elements with physical and geometrical nonlinearities.” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 288–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeris, C. A. and Mahin, S. A. (1988). “Analysis of reinforced concrete beam-columns under uniaxial excitation.” Journal of Structure Engineering, Vol. 114, No. 4, pp. 804–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeris, C. A. and Mahin, S. A. (1991). “Behavior of reinforced concrete structures subjected to biaxial excitation.” Journal of Structure Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 9, pp. 2657–2673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Th., Truty, A., Urbanski, A., and Podles, K. (2008). Zsoil user manual, Zace Services, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belgasmia Mourad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mourad, B., Sabah, M. Comparison between static nonlinear and time history analysis using flexibility-based model for an existing structure and effect of taking into account soil using Domain Reduction Method for a single media. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 651–663 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0351-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0351-y

Keywords

Navigation