Comparative study on SBNR, GSBR and Anammox for combined treatment of anaerobic digester effluent
- 231 Downloads
In this study Shortcut Biological Nitrogen Removal (SBNR), Granular Sequencing Batch Reactor (GSBR), and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) were comparatively discussed for combined treatment of anaerobic digester effluent. The experiments were carried out through operating pilot and lab scale reactors. These processes have common ground that biologically removes high strength ammonium and they are cost effective and energy efficient. The SBNR process could remove significant nitrogen from anaerobic digestion effluent without supplementation with additional carbon and alkalinity at a low C/N ratio. The aerobic granular sludge which was generated by the GSBR process demonstrated an effective simultaneous organic and ammonium removal. The Anammox process was successfully started using UASB and SBR. After 100 days, the ammonium removal exponentially increased and finally approached to around 75% in both reactors. However, the high active biomass and the long period, which are needed to start up Anammox process, limited the application of this process.
Keywordsbiological wastewater treatment anaerobic digester effluent shortcut nitrogen removal aerobic granulation anammox
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- APHA (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st Edn., American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
- Dosta, J., Fernandez, I., Vazquez-Padin, J. R., Mosquera-Corral, Campos, J. L., Mata-Alvarez, J., and Mendez, R. (2008). “Short-and longterm effects of temperature on the Anammox process.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 154, Nos. 1–3, pp. 688–693, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Egli, K., Fanger, U., Alvarez, J. J. P., Siegris, H., van der Meer, R. J., and Zehnder, J. B. A. (2001). “Enrichment and characterization of an anammox bacterium from a rotating biological contactor treating ammonium-rich leachate.” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 198–207, DOI: 10.1007/s002030100255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hellinga, C., Schellen, A. A. J. C., Mulder, J. W., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., and Heijnen, J. J. (1998). “The SHARON process: An innovative method for nitrogen removal from ammonium-rich waste water.” Water Science and Technology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 135–142, DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00281-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strous, M., Heijnen, J. J., Kuenen, J. G., and Jetten, M. S. M. (1998). “The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms.” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 589–596, DOI: 10.1007/s002530051340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Terada, A., Zhou, S., and Hosomi, M. (2011). “Presence and detection of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria and appraisal of anammox process for high-strength nitrogenous wastewater treatment: A review.” Chemical Technology and Environmental Policy, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 759–781, DOI: 10.1007/s10098-011-0355-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van der Star, W. R. L., Abma, W. R., Blommers, D., Mulder, J. W., Tokutomi, T., Strous, M., Picioreanu, C., and Van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2007). “Startup of reactors for anoxic ammonium oxidation: Experiences from the first full-scale anammox reactor in Rotterdam.” Water Research, vol. 41, no. 18, pp. 4149–4163, DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.03.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Dongen, U., Jetten, M. S. M., and van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2001). “The SHARON-Anammox process for treatment of ammonium rich wastewater.” Water Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 153–160.Google Scholar