Skip to main content
Log in

Descriptive and parametric analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance in mixed traffic conditions

  • Transportation Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Crossing is an inevitable part of walking in which the desired path of pedestrians conflicts with vehicular traffic. These conflicts can result in either delay or risk to the pedestrians. Due to insufficient designated crossing points on a highway or improper design, most pedestrians are forced to cross at random unpredictable locations. As such, they create confusion and risks to themselves, as well as to the drivers. Road accident statistics reveal that pedestrian injury and deaths are very high in India and improper gap acceptance during crossing is a major contributing factor. Gap acceptance data collected at 17 locations in five cities of India are analysed in this study to understand the variation in the gap acceptance behavior through descriptive and parametric analysis. Descriptive analysis provided central tendency, dispersion and distribution of gap acceptance data, whereas, parametric analysis resulted in identification of relationships between factors affecting accepted gap. Accepted gap was found decreasing with conflicting traffic and crossing speed of the pedestrians. It also found varying with change in number of lanes on the road to be crossed. Critical gap was estimated from accepted gap and crossing time distribution functions for varied traffic and spatial conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew, H. W. (1991). “Factors influencing pedestrian cautiousness in crossing streets.” Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A. M., Fitzpatrick, K., Whitacre, A. J., and Lord, D. (2006). “Exploration of pedestrian Gap-acceptance behaviour at selected locations.” Transportation Research Record 1982, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, pp. 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carthy, T., Packham, D., Salter, D., and Silcock D. (1995). Risk and safety on the roads: The older pedestrian, Report Prepared for AA Foundation for Road Safety Research, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Dearnaley, E. J., and Hansel, C. E. M. (1955). “The risk taken in crossing a road.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., Mansk, C. F., and Manuszak, M. D. (2005). “Walk or wait? An empirical analysis of street crossing decisions.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 20, pp. 529–548.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • DiPietro, C. M. and King, L. E. (1970). “Pedestrian gap-acceptance.” Highway Research Record, No. 308, NCHRP, Washington, D.C., pp. 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Road Safety Observatory (ERSO) (2007). Traffic safety basic facts data base, Project Data base of the European Commission, Director-General Transport & Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) (2008). Data summary, Report by US Department of Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garder, P. (1989). “Pedestrian safety at traffic signals: A study carried out with the help of a traffic conflicts technique.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grebert, J. (2008). Pedestrian safety consideration enhancement, SICA Project Proposal Report, SIMBA Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamed, M. M. (2001). “Analysis of pedestrians’ behavior at pedestrian crossings.” Safety Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, J. and Russel, J. (1993). “Traffic barriers and pedestrian crossing behaviour.” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 1, pp. 4, pp. 230–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollo, P., Papp, I., and Siska, T. (1995). “Observation of elderly pedestrians on signalized crossings and of jaywalkers in the vicinity of pedestrian subways.” Proceedings of the 8th Workshop, International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety, Paris, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareem, A. (2003). “Review of global menace of road accidents with special reference to Malaysia — A social perspective.” Malaysian Journal of Medical Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelias, P., Papaioannou, P., and Vasiliadou, J. (2002). “Effectiveness of a pedestrian measure in an arterial street in Thessaloniki, Greece: First results.” Proceedings of the 13th Workshop, International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic Safety, Corfu, pp. 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacod, M. C., Sun, W., Chien, S. I., Eisdorfer A., and Qu, T. (1999). “Effect of midblock access points on traffic accidents on state highways in new jersey.” Transportation Research Record 1665, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyte, M., Clemow, C., and Khisty, C. J. (1991). “Capacity and delay characteristics of two way stop controlled intersection.” Transportation Research Record 1332, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, pp. 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, D. (2004). The road ahead: Traffic injuries and fatalities in india, Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme, IIT Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. L. (1953). “Pedestrian choice and judgment.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 4, pp. 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J., Brian Fildes, Elfriede Ihsen, Judith Charlton and Ross Day, (1997). “Differences in traffic judgments between young and old adult pedestrians.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 129, No. 6, pp. 839–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palamarthy, S., Mahmassan, H., and Machemehl, R. (1994). “Models of Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Signalized Intersections.” Research Report 1296-1. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, I. A. and Palmer C. J. (1997), “Pedestrian accidents and road safety education in selected developing countries.” 3 rd African Road Safety Congress, 14–17 April, Pretoria, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonfeld, C. and Musumeci, A. (2003). Pedestrian travel: Getting queenslanders walking safely, Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety-Queensland, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisiopiku, V. P. and Akin, V. (2003), “Pedestrian behaviors at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: An examination based on observation and survey data.” Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, L., Dunne, M. C., and Black, J. A. (1993). “Models of delay and accident risk to pedestrians.” Transportation and Traffic Flow Theory, Proceedings of 12 th International Symposium, Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. G. and Grayson, G. B. (1980). Age-related differences in the road crossing behaviour of adult pedestrians, Report No. LR 933, Transport Research Laboratory, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Jiali and Jiaping, Wu (2003). “Analysis of pedestrian behavior with mixed traffic flow at intersection.” Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal, IEEE, Vol. 1, pp. 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhenzhong, C. and Nambisan, S. S. (2009) “Methodology for evaluating the safety of midblock pedestrian crossing.” Transportation Research Record 1828, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satish Chandra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandra, S., Rastogi, R. & Das, V.R. Descriptive and parametric analysis of pedestrian gap acceptance in mixed traffic conditions. KSCE J Civ Eng 18, 284–293 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0363-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0363-z

Keywords

Navigation