Skip to main content
Log in

Construction project risk assessment by using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system: An empirical study

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managers require a good understanding about the nature of risks involved in a construction project because the duration, quality, and budget of projects can be affected by these risks. Thus, the identification of risks and the determination of their priorities in every phase of the construction can assist project managers in planning and taking proper actions against those risks. Therefore, prioritizing risks via the risk factors can increase the reliability of success. In this research, first the risks involved in construction projects has been identified and arranged in a systematic hierarchical structure. Next, based on the obtained data an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) has been designed for the evaluation of project risks. In addition, a stepwise regression model has also been designed and its results are compared with the results of ANFIS. The results show that the ANFIS models are more satisfactory in the assessment of construction projects risks. Our proposed methodology can be applied by managers of construction projects and practitioners to assess of risk factor of construction projects in a proper manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Bahar, J. F., and Crandall, K. C. (1990). “Systematic risk management approach for construction projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp. 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, T. H., Stewart, R. A., and Qureshi, S. (2007). “Evaluating risk management practices in the pakistani construction industry: The current state of play.” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century: Accelerating Innovation in Engineering, Management and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., and Mininno, V. (2007). “Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature.” Information & Management, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 547–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An, M., Baker, C., and Zeng, J. (2005). “A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative risk modeling in the construction process.” World Journal Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assaf, S. A. and Al-Hejji, S. (2006). “Causes of delay in large construction projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloi, D. and Price, A. D. F. (2003). “Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunni, N. G. (2003). Risk and insurance in construction (2nd Edition), Spon Press London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, V. and Tah, J. H. M. (2001). “A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: Construction project risk management system.” Advances in engineering software, Vol. 32, Nos. 10–11, pp. 847–857.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. and Wang, J. (2009). “Application of a Fuzzy AHP method to risk assessment of international construction projects.” 2009 International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Business Intelligence, pp. 459–462.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P. K. (2001). “Decision support system for risk management: A case study.” Management Decision, Vol. 39, No. 8, pp. 634–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen, I., Birgonul, M. T., and Han, S. (2007). “Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 494–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhag, T. M. and Wang, Y. M. (2007). “Risk assessment for bridge maintenance projects: Neural networks versus regression techniques.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 402–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eybpoosh, M., Dikmen, I., and Talat Birgonul, M. (2011). “Identification of risk paths in international construction projects using structural equation modeling.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 12, pp. 1164–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C., Marle, F., Zio, E., and Bocquet, J.-C. (2012). “Network theorybased analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 106, pp. 1–10, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu-zhou, L. and Hong-yuan, G. (2011). “The risk assessment model of BT construction engineering project financing.” Systems Engineering Procedia, Vol. 1, pp. 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadd, S., Keeley, D., and Balmforth, H. (2003). Good practice and pitfalls in risk assessment, Research Report 151, Health & Safety Laboratory for the Health and Safety Executive, HSE Books Sudbury and Suffolk, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, K. C. and Jha, K. N. (2005). “Factors affecting cost performance: evidence from Indian construction projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, J. S. R. (1993). “ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangari, R. (1988). “Construction risk management.” Civil Engineering Systems, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuchta, D. (2001). “Use of fuzzy numbers in project risk (criticality) assessment.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, Y.-C. and Lu, S.-T. (2013). “Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach to enhance risk assessment for metropolitan construction projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31, Issue 4, pp. 602–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. M. and Lin, L. (2010). “A new fuzzy risk assessment Approach.” Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, pp. 98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKim, R. A. (1993). “Neural networks and identification and estimation of risk.” Transactions of AACE International, p. 5–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieto-Morote, A. and Ruz-Vila, F. (2011). “A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perng, S. L. H. Y. H. and Lee, M. R. Y. J. R. 2007. “On-line multicriterion risk assessment model for construction joint ventures in China.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PMI (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK Guide, 3rd Ed., Project Management Institute Inc USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saqib, M. R.U. Farooqui and Lodi, S. H. (2008). “Assessment of critical success factors for construction projects in pakistan.” First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries, Karachi, Pakistan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L. Y., Wu, G. W. C., and Ng, C. S. K. (2001). “Risk assessment for construction joint ventures in China.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 127, No. 1, pp. 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tah, J. H. M. and Carr, V. (2000). “A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, T. and Sugeno, M. (1985). “Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 116–132.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M. and Elhag, T. M. (2007). “A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment.” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M. and Elhag, T. (2008). “An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for bridge risk assessment.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 3099–3106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., Liu, J., and Elhag, T. (2008). “An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment.” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. and Yuan, H. (2011). “Factors affecting contractors’ risk attitudes in construction projects: Case study from China.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenxi, Z. (2007). “Applying an improved bp network to risk assessment of performance for expressway management corporations.” Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007, WiCom 2007, International Conference on, pp. 4618–4621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenxi, Z. and Danyang, C. (2009). “Expressway management risk evaluation based on fuzzy neural networks.” Proceedings of the 2009 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation-Volume 02, pp. 700–703.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, G. M. (2010). Managing construction projects, John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L., Wang, S., and Lai, K. K. (2008). “Credit risk assessment with a multistage neural network ensemble learning approach.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 1434–1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack Jr, J. G. (1996). “Risk-sharing-good concept, bad name.” Cost Engineering, Vol. 38, No. 7, pp. 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavadskas, E., Turskis, Z., and Tamošaitienä, J. (2010). “Risk assessment of construction projects.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zayed, T., Amer, M., and Pan, J. (2008). “Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 408–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J., An, M., and Chan, A. H. C. (2005). “A fuzzy reasoning decision making approach based multi-expert judgement for construction project risk analysis.” Proceedings of the twenty-first annual conference. Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM), London UK, pp. 841–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J., An, M., and Smith, N. J. (2007). “Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, R. and Govind, R. (1991). “Algebraic characteristics of extended fuzzy numbers.” Information Sciences, Vol. 54, Nos. 1–2, pp. 103–130.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, D. X. M. and Ng, T. (2005). “Stochastic time-cost optimization model incorporating fuzzy sets theory and non-replacement.” Journal of Constructing Engineering Manage., Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, P. X. W., Zhang, G., and Wang, J. (2007). “Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 601–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Ebrat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrat, M., Ghodsi, R. Construction project risk assessment by using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system: An empirical study. KSCE J Civ Eng 18, 1213–1227 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0139-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0139-5

Keywords

Navigation