Abstract
The porous microstructure of cementitious materials can be examined using the fractal approach. The aim of our study is to make an evaluation of the fractal characteristics of pore size distributions of cementitious materials measured by the mercury intrusion porosimetry technique. The cement paste, mortar, and concrete specimens were mixed with various water-cement ratios and curing ages. The fractal characteristics of these materials were examined through fractal models for the pore size distribution, and were represented by only one physical parameter, namely-the fractal dimension. The results illustrate that cementitious materials are porous fractal structure. Five different calculation models of the fractal dimensions were developed. Overall, the modeled fractal dimension values were consistent. A final discussion on the relationship between the modeled values and the evolution of the pore structure was presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, X., Wu, S., and Zhou, J. (2013). “Influence of porosity on compressive and tensile strength of cement mortar.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 869–874.
Feldman, R. F. and Beaudoin, J. J. (1991). “Pretreatment of hardened hydrated cement pastes for mercury intrusion measurements.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 21, Nos. 2–3, pp. 297–308.
He, R., Xu, X., Chen, C., Fan H., and Zhang, B. (1998). “Evolution of pore fractal dimensions for burning porous chars.” Fuel, Vol. 77, No. 12, pp. 1291–1295.
Ji, X., Chan, S. Y. N., and Feng, N. (1997). “Fractal model for simulating the space-filling process of cement hydrates and fractal dimensions of pore structure of cement-based materials.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 27, No. 11, pp. 1691–1699.
Jozefaciuk, G., Slawinski, C., and Vrzhashch, E. (2009). “Changes in textural properties of selected minerals under acid and alkali treatment from mercury intrusion porosimetry.” Applied Clay Science, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 63–68.
Kumar, R. and Bhattacharjee, B. (2003). “Porosity, pore size distribution and in situ strength of concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 155–164.
Neimark, A. (1992). “A new approach to the determination of the surface fractal dimension of porous solids.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 191, Nos. 1–4, pp. 258–262.
Pfeifer, P. and Avnir, D. (1983). “Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. I: Fractal theory of heterogeneous surfaces.” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 79, No. 7, pp. 3558–3565.
Shi, M., Li, X., and Chen, Y. (2006). “Determination of effective thermal conductivity for polyurethane foam by use of fractal method.” Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 468–475.
Usteri, M., Bonny, J. D., and Leuenberger, H. (1990). “Fractal dimension of porous solid dosage forms.” Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 55–61.
Winslow, D., Bukowski J. M., and Young, J. F. (1995). “The fractal arrangement of hydrated cement paste.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 147–156.
Zhang, B. and Li, S. (1995). “Determination of the surface fractal dimension for porous media by mercury porosimetry.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 1383–1386.
Zhang, M. and Li, H. (2011). “Pore structure and chloride permeability of concrete containing nano-particles for pavement.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 608–616.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Zhou, J. & Ding, N. Fractal characterization of pore system evolution in cementitious materials. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 719–724 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0320-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0320-2