Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Negotiating subcontract conditions in the Australian construction industry

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strategic negotiation of subcontracts appears to contain many benefits regarding cost savings, quality improvement, better project time management, and project value enhancement. The primary purpose of the study presented in this paper is to investigate the current and prospective concepts of negotiable subcontract conditions in the Australian construction industry that can alleviate elongated negotiations and attain a win/win result for both contractor and subcontractor. The study first discussed legislative regulations and opinions concerning subcontract negotiation through extensive review on academic literature and Australian Standards including AS 4903 General conditions of subcontract for design and construct and AS 4300 General conditions of contract for design and construct. The study was further developed in the form of a survey, collecting data from 71 respondents (i.e., contractors and subcontractors) from the Queensland, New South Wales and Northern Territory construction industries in Australia. Cronbach’s alpha assessed the reliability of survey responses. The research then statistically analyzed not only critical negotiation factors contributing to project performance based on Fisher’s exact test but also significant differences between contractors’ and subcontractors’ viewpoints to subcontract negotiation by ANOVA testing. The survey results revealed that contractors and subcontractors attain different opinions regarding the fairness of subcontract conditions; however, both parties believed that there were genuine opportunities to improve project performance and value via the negotiation of subcontract conditions using an integrative approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A. (1992). “A survey of exact inference for contingency tables.” Statistical Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 131–153.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2012). Building activity, Australia, Issue No. 8752.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Belconnen, ACT, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barru, D. J. (2005). “How to guarantee contractor performance on international construction projects: Comparing surety bonds with bank guarantees and standby letters of credit.” The George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 51–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, A., Anastasopoulos, P. Ch., Labi, S., Sinha, K. C., and Mannering, F. L. (2010). “Three-stage least-squares analysis of time and cost overruns in construction contracts.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 11, pp. 1207–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, J. M. (2001). Negotiating globally: How to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries, Wiley Australia, Stafford BC, QLD, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. (2005). “Subcontract negotiation.” Contract Journal, Vol. 426, No. 6507, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canales, J. I. and Vila, J. (2005). “Sequence of thinking and acting in strategy-making.” Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 22, pp. 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplicki, E. and Guidry, R. (2006). “Liquidated damages for delay in construction contracts.” Construction Accounting and Taxation, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, Y. (2009). “Subcontracting and its ramifications: A survey of the building industry in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlin, J. and Retik, A. (1997). “The applicability of project management software and advanced IT techniques in construction delays mitigation.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.” Psychometrika, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Valence, G. and Runeson, G. (2011). “On the state of the building industry after the GFC and the Euro crisis.” Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, R. T. (2007). “Understanding liquidated damages: A conversation with construction attorney David J. Pfeffer of Arent Fox.” Construction Accounting & Taxation, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzeng, R. J. and Lin, Y. C., (2004). “Intelligent agents for supporting construction procurement negotiation.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 27, No. 01, pp. 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayek, A., Ghoshal, I., and AbouRizk, S. (1999). “A survey of the bidding practices of Canadian civil engineering construction contractors.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, pp. 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, M. C. (2010). “Negotiating for value.” Supply and Demand Chain Executive, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1918). “The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 52, pp. 399–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1954). Statistical methods for research workers, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grensing-Pophal, L. (2001). “Negotiating tactics.” Credit Union Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F., McCaffer, R., and Edun-Fotwe, F. (2006). Modern Construction Management, 6th Ed, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, J., Selstead, G., and Mahoney, J. P. (1992). “Cost overruns on state of Washington construction contracts.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1351, pp. 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, J. and Tracey, A. (1994). “The contractor-subcontractor relationship: The subcontractor’s view.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, R. F. (1971). “Imagination and amplification in psychotherapy.” Journal of Analytical Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 79–105.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hovakimian, A. and Hovakimian, G. (2009). “Cash flow sensitivity of investment.” European Financial Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, W., Hillebrandt, P., and Murdoch, J. (2000). “The impact of contract duration on the cost of cash retention.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, P., Sertyesilisik, B., and Ross, A. (2010). “Variations and change orders on construction projects.” Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G. (2001). “Negotiating.” Training Journal, Vol. 1, No. 8, pp. S1–S4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerur, S. and Marshall, W. (2012). “Identifying and managing risk in international construction projects.” International Review of Law, Vol. 8, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, P. (1999). The handbook for psychological testing, 2nd Edition, Routledge, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, M. M. and Matthews, J. D. (2000). “Improved subcontractor selection employing partnering principles.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, M. M. and Yogeswaranb, K. (2003). “Substantiation and assessment of claims for extensions of time.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyte, C. A., Perfater, M. A., Haynes, S., and Lee, H. W. (2004). Developing and validating a highway construction project cost estimation tool, Final Report, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motawa, I. and Kaka, A. (2009). “Modelling payment mechanisms for supply chain in construction engineering.” Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagi, S. C., Drew, D. S., Lo, H. P., and Skitmore, M. (2002). “A theoretical framework for determining the minimum number of bidders in construction bidding competitions.” Journal of Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 473–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. (2005). “Negotiating success.” Insurance and Technology, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, A. L. and Haines, G. Jr. (2001). “Loan guarantees: Costs of default and benefits to small firms.” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runeson, G. (2000). Building economics, Deakin University Press, Geelong, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (1993). “Dealing with delay claims: A survey.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skitmore, M. and Pemberton, J. (1994). “A multivariate approach to construction contract bidding mark-up strategies.” Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 1263–1272.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia (1995). AS 4300 general conditions of contract for design and construct, Standards Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia (2000). AS 4903 general conditions of subcontract for design and construct, Standards Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uher, T. E. (1991). “Risks in subcontracting: Subcontract conditions.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. and Chapman, C. (1994). “Choosing contract payment terms.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 216–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, B., Fraas, L., and Watson, J. K. (2002). “Negotiating contracts.” Credit Union Magazine, Vol. 68, No. 9, pp. 4A–10A.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-744, Korea

    Seokho Chi

  2. Matrix Projects Pty. Ltd., Loganholme, QLD, 4129, Australia

    Christopher L. Mackay

Authors
  1. Seokho Chi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher L. Mackay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seokho Chi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chi, S., Mackay, C.L. Negotiating subcontract conditions in the Australian construction industry. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 485–497 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0303-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0303-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation