Skip to main content
Log in

Lean concurrent submittal review systems

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

General constructors prepare submittal documents using a push system, thus generating a submittal inventory. The submitted documents are subject to amendment and re-review due to change orders, resulting in waste through rework. The objective of this research is to develop a Lean Concurrent Submittal Review System (LCSRS) to reduce waste in the submittal review process. In the system, a stable construction process is established by integrating the various stakeholders. Submittal documents are pulled by construction status to decrease submittal inventory, thus reducing the impact of change orders on construction flow. To validate the applicability of the proposed system, computer simulation models are constructed using eM-Plant software, allowing for comparisons between regular and lean review systems. Experimental results show that the proposed LCSRS can reduce submittal inventory and change order impact, while promoting stable construction flow. This study is one of the first to apply lean manufacturing to the submittal review process in the construction industry. The proposed system could be used as a platform to promote collaboration between general contractors and supervisory units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, T. K. (2011). “Material handling and process improvement using lean manufacturing principles.” International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory Applications and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, J. and Muller, E. (2007). “Modelling, planning and designing of logistics structures of regional competence-cell-based networks with structure types.” Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 601–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, M. A. and Karim, M. A. (2013). “A time-based quantitative approach for selecting lean strategies for manufacturing organisations.” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 1146–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, E. W. and Love, D. R. (2011). “Value-added analysis of the construction submittal process.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 1070–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2008). “Design delays.” Engineered Systems, Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, D. F. and Lee, J. (2011). “Lean construction submittal process-A case study.” Quality Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, H. E. (2006). “Digital project management: Using cuttingedge software to manage building projects.” Cadalyst, Vol. 23, No. 9, pp. 46–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C., Akinci, B., and Garrett Jr., J. H. (2007). “Formalism for construction inspection planning: Requirements and process concept.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. J. and Spearman, M. L. (2011). Factory physics: Foundations of manufacturing management, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilper, C. W. (2002). Professional practices: Are construction submittals irrelevant?, Reed Business Information Resource Center, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko, C. H. and Kuo, J. D. (2013). “Making formwork construction lean.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management (accepted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. S. and Yang, C. C. (2009a). “Meticulously discuss toyota production system.” Quality Monthly Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 13–18 (in Chinese).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. S. and Yang, C. C. (2009b). “Kanban in toyota production system.” Quality Monthly Journal, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 42–49 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. (2004). The toyota way, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, T. (2006). “New firm aims to help contractors deliver on time.” Engineering News-Record, Vol. 257, No. 19, pp. 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosbisch, M. R. and Winter, R. M. (2006). “Managing resource levelling.” Cost Engineering, Vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostanik, M. (2007). Construction submittal and shop drawing liability, http://www.submittalexchange.com (retrieved May 1, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Construction Commission (2007). Training materials of quality management for public projects, Executive Yuan, Taipei (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Serag, E., Oloufa, A., Malone, L., and Radwan, E. (2010). “Model for quantifying the impact of change orders on project cost for U.S. roadwork construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 9, pp. 1015–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaton, D., Hunderman, H. J., Petterson, D. S., and Weber, R. A. (2004). “The value of peer review in avoiding failures.” Construction Specifier, Vol. 57, No. 8, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, D. J. (2006). “What submittals tell us.” Construction Specifier, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chien-Ho Ko.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ko, CH., Li, SC. Lean concurrent submittal review systems. KSCE J Civ Eng 19, 478–484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0254-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0254-8

Keywords

Navigation