Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating perceived quality of traffic information system using structural equation modeling

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Megacities worldwide have been employing some form of traffic information systems to manage their road network and to mitigate congestion. However, the full benefits of such systems can only be achieved if drivers perceive the system to be of adequate quality for them to actually use the disseminated information in their travel choices. One way to evaluate the underlying quality of the system is to conduct questionnaire survey, gather direct driver feedback and perform statistical analyses to derive attributes or indicators such as driver awareness, utilization of traffic information and perceived effectiveness which are useful to agencies for their planning and management activities. However many past works have treated the attributes to be independent and did not offer a complete picture on the perceived quality of the traffic information system. This paper therefore presents the development of a holistic structural equation model that can consider all potential attributes affecting perceived quality in a single framework. Attributes considered in the paper include: driver awareness, driver utilization, perceived effectiveness, expectation, and perceived necessity of the system. Using the traffic information system in Klang Valley, Malaysia as a case study, it is demonstrated that there are causal and cross-loading relationships between the attributes contributing to perceived system quality and the attributes must be considered in a comprehensive manner. In addition, the model offers a useful interpretation on the factors affecting road user perception on the traffic information system, thereby allowing agencies to undertake appropriate measures to further improve the level of user satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Aty, M. A., Kitamura, R., and Jovanis, P. P. (1997). “Using stated preference data for studying the effect of Advanced Traffic Information on drivers’ route choice.” Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, P. (1992). “The influence of route guidance advice on route choice in urban networks.” Transportation, Vol. 19, Issule 1, pp. 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplice, C. and Mahmassani, H. S. (1992). “Aspects of commuting behavior: Preferred arrival time, use of information and switching propensity.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 26, Issue 5, pp. 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. W. (2007). Effects of changeable message sign display on the route choice behaviors of drivers on freeway, Master’s Thesis, Feng Chia University, Taiwan (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Liu, M., Gao, L., Meng, C., Li, W., and Zheng, J. (2008). “Effects of Variable Message Signs (VMS) for improving congestion.” Proceedings of International Workshop on Modelling, Simulation and Optimization, pp. 416–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choocharukul, K. (2008). “Effects of attitudes, socioeconomic and travel characteristics on stated route diversion: A structural equation modeling approach of road users in Bangkok.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2048, pp. 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerink, R. H. M., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P., and Ommeren, J. N. V (1996). “Variable message signs and radio traffic information: An integrated empirical analysis of drivers route choice behavior.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuji, S. and Kitamura, R. (2000). “Anticipated travel time, information acquisition and actual experience: The case of the Hanshin expressway route closure.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1725, pp. 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T. F. (2003). “Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research.” Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 37, Issue 1, pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T. F., Bunch, D. S., and Brownstone, D. (1997). “A vehicle usage forecasting model based on revealed and stated vehicle type choice and utilization data. ” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, T. F. and Hensher, D. A. (1998). “Greenhouse gas emissions and Australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement.” Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 3, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). “The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues.” In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, R. H. Hoyle (ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corporation (2012). SPSS Amos: Take your analysis to the next level and get your research noticed, Accessed: July 10, 2012. 〈http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/products/statistics/amos/

    Google Scholar 

  • Jou, R-C., Lam S-H., Liu, Y-H., and Chen, K-H. (2005). “Route switching behavior on freeways with the provision of different types of real-time traffic information.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 39, Issue 5, pp. 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattak, A. J., Schofer, J. L., and Koppelman, F. S. (1993). “Commuters’ enroute diversion and return decisions: Analysis and implications for advanced traveler information systems.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, The Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppam, A. R. and Pendyala, R. M. (2001). “A structural equation analysis of commuter activity and travel patterns.” Transportation, Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Lee, C., and Pietrucha, M. T. (2008). “Evaluation of driver satisfaction of travel information on variable message signs using fuzzy logic.” Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 42, No.1, pp. 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C. and Austin, J. T. (2000). “Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmer, A. and Papageorgiou, M. (1994). “Automatic control methods applied to freeway network traffic.” Automatica, Vol. 30, Issue 4, pp. 691–702.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, T. and Sasaki, K. (1998). “Discrete choice models with latent variables using subjective data.” Travel Behavior Research: Updating the State of Pla. Pergamon, In: Ortuzar J. D., Hensher D. A., Jara-Diaz, S. (Eds.), Oxford, pp. 435–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • MV2 (1997). Evaluation of efficiency of variable message sign policy (in France), Report to Direction Regionale Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, L. and Mannering, F. (1999). “Statistical analysis of the impact of traveler advisory systems on driving behavior.” Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, M., Gower, P., Messmer, A., and Morin, J. M. (1994). “Control strategies for variable message signs.” Towards an Intelligent Transportation System: Proceedings of 1st World Congress Applications Transportation Telematics and IVHS, In: R. Srinivasan, F. H. Landau, C. M. Hein, P. P. Jovanis, eds., London: Artech House. pp. 1229–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeta, S., Ramos, J. L., and Pasupathy, R. (2000). “Content of variable message signs and on-line driver behavior.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1725, pp. 102–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, Z.-R. and Guequierre, N. (2004). “Motorist response to arterial variable message signs.” The 83 rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, S. and Lappin, J. (2004). “Why don’t more people use advanced traveler information? Evidence from the Seattle area.” The 83 rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, R. A. (2003). “Towards a better understanding of needs for travel information: Analysis of a commuter survey.” Proceedings of the 83 rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. (CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A. and McDonald, M. (2007). “Questionnaire surveys to evaluate user response to variable message signs in an urban network.” Institution of Engineering and Technology Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, E. S. M. and MacCallum, R. C. (1988). “Some factors affecting the success of specification searches in covariance structure modeling.” Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simma, A. and Axhausen, K. W. (2001). “Within-household allocation of travel: The case of upper Austria.” Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spyridakis, J., Barfield, W., Conquest. L., Haselkorn, M., and Isakson, C (1991). “Surveying commuter behavior: Designing motorists information systems.” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhr, D. (2010). The basics of structural equation modeling, www.lexjansen.com/wuss/2006/tutorials/TUT-Suhr.pdf (Accessed 1st October, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutandi, A. C. (2008). “Evaluation of the impacts of VMS on traffic performance measures in an urban area in Indonesia.” Civil Engineering Dimension, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardiff, T. J. (1976). “Causal inferences involving transportation attitudes and behavior.” Transportation Research, Vol. 11, Issue 6, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsirimpa, A. and Polydoropoulou, A. (2009). “Travelers response to VMS in the Athens area.” Proceedings of Research in Transport and Logistics, pp.179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardman, M., Bonsall, P. W., and Shires, J. D. (1997). “Driver response to variable message signs: A stated preference investigation.” Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 389–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C., Wang, W., Chen, J., Wang, W., Yang, C., and Li., Z. (2010). “Analyzing travelers’ intention to accept travel information: Structural equation modeling.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2156, pp. 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yim, Y., Khattak, A. J., and Raw, J. (2002). “Traveler response to new dynamic information sources: Analyzing corridor and area-wide behavioral surveys.” The 81st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, Y. and Yagnace, J. L. (1996). “Link flow evaluation using loop detectors data: Traveler response to variable message signs.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1550, pp. 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, X.-S., Xu, J.-M., and Li, H.-B. (2010). Study on setting of VMS for urban expressway based on SP survey, 〈http://www.chinautc.com/information/manage/UNCC_Editor/uploadfile/20081209112543997.pdf〉 Accessed on 1st May, 2010 (in Chinese). www.dbkl.gov.my, City Hall Kuala Lumpur (CHKL), (Accessed 1st May, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hooi Ling Khoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khoo, H.L., Ong, G.P. Evaluating perceived quality of traffic information system using structural equation modeling. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 837–849 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0248-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0248-6

Keywords

Navigation