Skip to main content
Log in

Success evaluation factors in construction project management — some evidence from medium and large Portuguese companies

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The construction industry plays a very important role in the Portuguese economy. In 2009, it was among the top five economic sectors, representing 13% of total employment. Nevertheless, project failures are still frequent mainly due to inadequate management practices and to the intrinsic characteristics of projects of the construction industry. Even though Portuguese construction has improved in recent years, cost and schedule overruns, low productivity and final product quality problems are still common. In this context, project management is a crucial tool for improving construction operations and for the overall success of projects. The aim of this article is to contribute to the discussion on success evaluation factors in a field where little has been written — the construction industry. Through a survey of 40 medium and large Portuguese companies several factors were identified which are currently considered in the evaluation of project success, as found in the literature review. The results show that the traditional factors, often referred to as the “Atkinson elements triangle” (cost, time and quality), are still the most relevant for evaluating the success of a project, but others, such as customer involvement and acceptance, have gained importance in recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, R. (1999). “Project management: Cost, time, and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it is time to accept other success criteria.” International Journal of Project management, Elsevier, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belout, A. and Gauvreau, C. (2004). “Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y., Chau, K. W., Anson, M., and Zhang, J. P. (2002). “An intelligent decision support system in construction management by data warehousing technique.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Vol. 2480, pp. 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carú, A., Cova, B., and Pace, S. (2004). “Project success: Lessons from the Andrea Case.” European Management Journal, Elsevier, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 532–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. and Chan, A. (2004). “Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking: An International Journal, Emerald, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, K. W. (2004). “A two-stage dynamic model on allocation of construction facilities with genetic algorithm.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 481–490.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, K. W., Anson, M., and Zhang, J. P. (2003). “Implementation of visualization as planning and scheduling tool in construction.” Building and Environment, Elsevier, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CII — Construction Industry Institute (2011). Knowledge management, https://www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/know.cfm?section=know (retrieved 10-03-2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, A., Palacios, R., Acosta, P., and Mayoral, M. (2010). “A qualitative study of hard decision making in managing global software development teams.” Information Systems Management, Taylor and Francis, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloi, H. and Lim, M. Y. (2007). “Measuring performance in Construction Projects-A critical analysis with an australian perspective.” Proc. COBRA-RICS (Construction and Building Research Conference of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors), London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIEC and EFBWW (2008). “Joint declaration on paritarian funds.” http://www.paritarian-funds-construction.eu/content/files/Warsaw%20declaration.pdf (retrieved in 30-05-2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG International (2012). Global engineering and construction companies need to adapt quickly, http://www.big4.com/kpmg/kpmg-global-engineering-and-construction-companies-need-toadapt-quickly (retrieved in 30-05-2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management — A systems approach to planning, scheduling and control, 10th Edition, Wiley, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. P. (2007). Fundamentals of project management. AMACOM (American Management Association), New York, 3rd Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, A. K. and Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). “The role of project management in achieving success.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navas, J. R. (2008). Engenharia de gestão de projectos, FCA-Editora de Informática, Lisboa, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, L. D., Oguniana, S. O., and Xuan Lan, D. T. (2004). “A study on project success factors in large construction projects in vietnam.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Emerald, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, A., Varajão, J., Dominguez, C., and Ribeiro, P. (2011). “Principais aspectos considerados na avaliação do sucesso de projectos de desenvolvimento.” Revista de ciência e tecnologia de Américas-Journal of Science and Technology of the Americas, Interciencia, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 200–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, R. C., Caro, E. T., Crespo, A. G., and Berbis, J. M. (2010). “Identifying technical competences of it professionals. the case of software engineers.” International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology, IGI Global, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires, B., Teixeira, J.C., and Moura, H. (2007). “Management functions and competitiveness in the Portuguese construction industry.” Proc. 25th CME (Conference Construction Management and Economics), Reading, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMI (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge, Project Management Institute, 4th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • PORDATA (2012). Personnel employed by sector of activity, http://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Pessoal+ao+servico+nas+empresas+nao+financeiras+total+e+por+sector+de+actividade+economica-163 (retrieved in 30-05-2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, R., Alarcón, L., and Knights, P. (2004). “Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldão, V. S. (2007). Gestão de projectos — Abordagem instrumental ao Planeamento, Organização e Controlo, Monitor, Lisboa, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., Gu, N., and Wang, X. (2011). “A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSO (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2 — PRINCE2, 5th edition, Nantwitch, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varajão, J., Cardoso, J., Gonçalves, D., and Cruz, J. (2008). “Análise à gestão de projectos de desenvolvimento de software em grandes empresas portuguesas.” Semana Informática, No. 904, pp. 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. J., Zhang, J. P., Chau, K. W., and Anson, M. (2004). “4D dynamic management for construction planning and resource utilization.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, D. and Fortune, J. (2002). “Current practice of project management — An empirical study.” International Project Management Journal, Elsevier, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Shen G., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., and Xue, X. (2011). “Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier, Vol. 29, Issue 7, pp. 900–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anabela Paiva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ribeiro, P., Paiva, A., Varajão, J. et al. Success evaluation factors in construction project management — some evidence from medium and large Portuguese companies. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 603–609 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0019-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0019-4

Keywords

Navigation