Skip to main content
Log in

Microscale geomembrane-granular material interactions

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

By quantifying the evolution of void ratio in granular soils of different angularity under different normal stress levels adjacent to geomembranes of varying roughness at different stages of shearing, the effect of geomembrane surface roughness on the interface shear mechanisms between granular materials and geomembranes was investigated. The extent of the shear zone thickness at the interfaces between combinations of round/angular particles and smooth/textured geomembrane surfaces were evaluated. For smooth geomembranes, the interface shear strength is developed by sliding and plowing of sand particles, while for textured geomembranes, the strength results from the interlocking and dilation of sand particles. Study on the effect of particle angularity showed that more angular sand particles resulted in larger plowing effects with smooth geomembranes which in turn yielded higher residual friction angles than with rounded to sub-rounded sand. Higher normal stress produced larger plowing effects for a given sand sheared against a smooth geomembrane and reduced the amount of dilation adjacent to textured geomembranes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DeJong, J. T., Frost, J. D., and Cargill, P. E. (2001). “Effect of surface texturing on CPT friction sleeve measurements.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 2, pp. 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, J. T., Frost, J. D., and Sacs, M. (2000). “Relating quantitative measures of surface roughness and hardness to geomaterial interface strength.” Proceedings of Geo-Eng 2000 Conference, Sydney, CDROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, J. E. (1996). Particle-geomembrane interface strength behavior as influenced by surface topography, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, J. E. and Frost, J. D. (1996). “A method for estimating geomembrane surface roughness.” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dove, J. E. and Frost, J. D. (1999). “Peak friction behavior of geomembrane-particle interfaces.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 7, pp. 544–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dove, J. E., Frost, J. D., Han, J., and Bachus, R. C. (1997). “The influence of geomembrane surface roughness on interface strength.” Proceedings of Geosynthetics ’97, Vol. 2, pp. 863–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, J. D. and DeJong, J. T. (2005). “In-situ assessment of role of surface roughness on interface response.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 4, pp. 498–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, J. D., DeJong, J. T., and Recalde, M. (2002b). “Shear failure behavior at granular-continuum interfaces.” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 69, No. 17, pp. 2029–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, J. D., Evans, T. M., Hebeler, G. L., and Giroud, J. P. (2002a). “Influence of wear mechanisms on geosynthetic interface strengths.” Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, Vol. 4, pp. 1325–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, J. D. and Han, J. (1999). “Behavior of interfaces between fiberreinforced polymers and sands.” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 8, pp. 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, J. D., Hebeler, G. L., Evans, T. M., and DeJong, J. T. (2004). “Interface behavior of granular soils.” Proceedings of Earth and Space 2004 Conference, Houston, pp. 65–72.

  • Frost, J. D. and Jang, D. J. (2000). “Evolution of sand microstructure during shear.” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 2, pp. 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, J. D., Lee, S. W., and Cargill, P. E. (1999). “The evolution of sand structure adjacent to geomembranes.” Proceedings of Geosynthetics ’99 Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 559–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuggle, A. R. and Frost, J. D. (2010). “Particle size effects in interface shear behavior and geomembrane wear.” Proceedings of International Symposium on Characterization and Behavior of Interfaces, Atlanta, IOS Press, pp. 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iscimen, M. and Frost, J. D. (2010). “Shearing behavior of curved surfaces.” Proceedings of International Symposium on Characterization and Behavior of Interfaces, Atlanta, IOS Press, pp. 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang, D. J., Frost, J. D., and Park, J. Y. (1999). “Preparation of epoxy impregnated sand coupons for image analysis.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. and Frost, J. D. (2010a). “Device for constrained/unconstrained testing of geosynthetic interface shear behavior.” Geotextiles and Geomembranes (in review).

  • Kim, D. and Frost, J. D. (2010b). “Effect of geotextile strain on geotextile-geomembrane interface shear mechanisms.” Geosynthetics Internationals (in review).

  • Kishida, H. and Uesugi, M. (1987). “Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus.” Geotechnique, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. L. and Seed, H. B. (1967). “Drained strength characteristics of sands.” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, No. 6, pp. 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W. (1998). Evolution of sand structure adjacent to interfaces, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. W., Frost, J. D., and Righter, G. K. (1998). “The influence of geomembrane surface roughness on geomembrane-geotextile interface strength.” Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Geosynthetics, Vol. 1, pp. 433–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paikowsky, S. G., Player, C. P., and Connors, P. J. (1995). “Dual interface apparatus for testing unrestricted friction of soil along solid surfaces.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 168–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. Y. (1999). A critical assessment of moist tamping and its effect on the initial and evolving structure of dilatant triaxial specimens, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, T. D., Williamson, T. A., and Eid, H. T. (1996). “HDPE geomembrane/ geotextile interface shear strength.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 122, No. 3, pp. 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. C. (1982). Profile characterization, chapter 4, in rough surfaces, Thomas, T. R. (ed.), Longman, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettler, T. E., Frost, J. D., and DeJong, J. T. (2000). “Shear-induced changes in smooth HDPE geomembrane surface topography.” Geosynthetics International, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 243–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seok-Won Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

David Frost, J., Kim, D. & Lee, SW. Microscale geomembrane-granular material interactions. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 79–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1476-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1476-x

Keywords

Navigation