Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment model on environmental economics for construction projects in Korea

  • Research Paper
  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

This study aims to propose an assessment model for environmental economics that will provide useful information for decision-making on the implementation of pro-environmental and economical construction projects. To meet this objective, this study suggests a procedure for estimating the environmental cost of construction projects. The model combines environmental load assessment and environmental value assessment. The environmental cost of pollutants generated from a construction project was estimated utilizing Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), a value assessment method borrowed from economic science. A case analysis was subsequently conducted to verify the applicability of the proposed model to actual construction projects. The devised model is expected to provide a useful methodology that will scientifically support the planning and management of sustainable construction not only in terms of the environmental aspect but also of the economical aspect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ciracy-Wantrup, S. V. (1947). “Capital returns from soil-conservation practices.” Journal of Farm Economics, Vol. 29, No. 4, Part 2, pp. 1181–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Li, H., and Wong, C. T. C. (2000) “Environmental management of urban construction projects in China.” J. of Constr. Eng. Manage., Vol. 126, No. 4, pp. 320–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Li, H., and Wong, C. T. C. (2005). “Environmental planning: analytic network process model for environmentally conscious construction planning.” J. of Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 1, pp. 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. Y. (2008). Global environment information observed from statistics, The Way of Living Together.

  • Construction Standard Estimation (2008). Construction standard estimation, Seoul. Construction Research Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. K. (1963). The value of outdoor recreation: An economy study of the Maine Woods, Ph. D. Dissertation, Harvard University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Textbook Study Society (2003). Environment and human beings, Seoul, Nokmundang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, C. and Horvath, A. (2000). “Resource use and environmental emissions of the U.S. Construction Sectors.” J. of Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2004). Life cycle assessment: Best practices of ISO 14040 series. Available from: http://www.apec.org/apec/publications/free_downloads/2004.MedialibDownload.v1.html?url=/etc/medialib/apec_media_library/downloads/committees/cti/pubs/2004.Par.0002.File.v1.1 (15 April 2006).

  • ISO 14041 (1998). Environmental management-life cycle assessment goal and scope definition and inventory analysis, Available from: http://www.scientificjournals.com/sj/lca/Pdf/aId/1799 (5 January 2008).

  • Kim, B., Kim, E., Pyo, D., Park, H., and Heo, U. (1995). “Generation of toxins from cyan bacteria in domestic lakes.” Korea Water Quality Preservation Institute Publication, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 231–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. H. (2008). Development of an assessment model for the environmental economics of construction projects, Dissertation, Chung-Ang University, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. H. and Kim, S. B. (2007). “Assessment of the environmental economy for infrastructure considering an environmental cost-case study on the emergency spillway facility of a multi-purpose dam.” Korea Institute of Const. Engineering & Management, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 168–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecouls, H. (1999). “ISO 14043: Environmental management-life cycle assessment-life cycle interpretation.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J., Kim, Y. S., Shin, D. C., and Shin, Y. C. (2004). “A study on a loss estimation model from cancer death caused by benzene in the air, Ulsan Area.” Korea Environment Economics Association — Korean Resource Economics Association, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 49–82.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method, Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • MKE (2008). http://www.mocie.go.kr/, Ministry of Knowledge Economy ([5 February 2008]).

  • MOCIE (2003). Standardization project on environmental management to establish a pro-environment industrial base, development of opt — Korean-type eco-indicator, Ministry of Commerce, Industry, & Energy, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOCT (2003). A study on an LCA utilization method in the construction sector, Ministry of Construction & Transportation, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2001). A study on setting up mid- and long-term strategyies to iintroduce an economic analysis system for environmental policyies, Ministry of Environment, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2003). Guidebook on cost/benefit analysis for environmental policyies, Ministry of Environment, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2007). Environmental statistics almanac, Ministry of Environment, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2008). http://www.me.go.kr/, Ministry of Economy ([5 February 2008]).

  • Myungjin Soft (2008). EBS/5.x: Event breakdown system, Seoul, Myungjin Soft Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K., Hwang Y., Seo, S., and Seo, H. (2003). “Quantitative assessment of environmental impacts on the life cycle of highways.” J. of Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pre (2008). Simapro 7.1., Pre-Pproduct Ecology Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryding, S.-O. (1999). “ISO 14042: Environmental management-life cycle assessment-life cycle impact assessment.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilford, K. R., Jaselskis, E. J., and Smith, G. R. (2000).” Impact of environmental contamination on construction projects.” J. of Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1997). Glossary of environment statistics, studies in methods, series F, No. 67, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Council (1979). “Procedures for the evaluation of National Economic Development (NED): Benefits and costs in water resources planning (Level C), final rule.” Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 242, pp. 72892–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Resources Council (1983). Principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies, Washington, D. C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyong Ju Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, SH., Kim, K.J., Kim, K. et al. Assessment model on environmental economics for construction projects in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 505–516 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1363-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1363-5

Keywords

Navigation