Skip to main content
Log in

An improved mode accuracy indicator for Eigensystem Realization Analysis (ERA) techniques

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

In this paper, an improved mode accuracy indicator is presented to more efficiently distinguish physically true modes from computational spurious modes generated by Eigensystem Realization Analysis (ERA) methods. Since the system order of real-life structures is a priori unknown, the number of assumed poles is usually set to be two to ten times the number of true modes in the frequency range of interests. Thus, the modal identification process could create exceedingly large number of computational modes. For the reason, it makes it difficult for analysts to distinguish the physically true modes from the spurious modes. The proposed mode accuracy indicator could better narrow down the choice of true modes than existing indicators and particularly it shows better consistency for the structure having high damping ratios. A series of numerical tests are demonstrated for verification of the proposed mode accuracy indicator. In addition, the improved mode accuracy indicator is applied to an experimental decentralized modal identification of a laboratory-size 8-panel space frame structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arici, Y. and Mosalam, K. M. (2005). “Modal identification of bridge systems using state-space methods.” Structural Control & Health Monitoring, Vol. 12, Nos. 3–4, pp. 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxoen, T. and Zimmerman, D. C. (2003). “Advances in Ritz vector identification.” Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 8, pp. 1131–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carden, E. P. and Brownjohn, J. M. W. (2008). “Fuzzy clustering of stability diagrams for vibration-based structural health monitoring.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, S. and Tcherniak, D. (2009). “Clustering approaches to automatic modal parameter estimation.” Proceedings of the 27th SEM International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.

  • Chhipwadia, K. S., Zimmerman, D. C., and James, G. H. (1999). “Evolving autonomous modal parameter estimation.” Proceedings of the 17th IMAC, Kissimmee, FL.

  • Goethals, I. and De Moor, B. (2002). “Model reduction and energy analysis as a tool to detect spurious modes.” Proceedings of ISMA International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, B. L. and Kalman, R. E. (1965). “Effective construction of linear state-variable models from input/output data.” Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Allerton Conference in Circuit and System Theory, pp. 449–459

  • Juang, J. N. and Pappa, R. S. (1985). “An eigensystem realizationalgorithm for modal parameter-identification and model-reduction.” Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 620–627.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pappa, R. S. (1999). “Independent analysis of the space station node modal test data.” Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappa, R. S. and Elliott, K. B. (1993). “Consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm.” Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 852–858.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pappa, R. S., James, G. H., and Zimmerman, D. C. (1998). “Autonomous modal identification of the space shuttle tail rudder.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, B. and De Roeck, G. (2001). “One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge: Environmental effects versus damage events.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainieri, C. and Fabbrocino, G. (2010). “Automated output-only dynamic identification of civil engineering structures.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 678–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scionti, M. and Lanslots, J. P. (2005). “Stabilisation diagrams: Pole identification using fuzzy clustering techniques.” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 36, Nos. 11–12, pp. 768–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, S., Yun, G. J., Lee, S. G., Caicedo, J. M., and Narasimhan, S. (2010). “Development of a benchmark laboratory structure for finite element model updating.” The 5th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, S. H., Spencer, B. F., Zhang, M. and Xie, H. (2009). “Automated decentralized modal analysis using smart sensors.” Structural Control & Health Monitoring Published online in Wiley Inter-Science DOI: 10.1002/stc.348.

  • Vanlanduit, S., Verboven, P., Guillaume, P., and Schoukens, J. (2003). “An automatic frequency domain modal parameter estimation algorithm.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 265, No. 3, pp. 647–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gun Jin Yun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yun, G.J., Lee, SG. & Shang, S. An improved mode accuracy indicator for Eigensystem Realization Analysis (ERA) techniques. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 377–387 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1236-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1236-y

Keywords

Navigation