Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of mortars exposed to different sulfate concentrations

  • Research Paper
  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper reports an experimental study on the sodium sulfate resistance of three Portland cements with various cement compositions (C3A or silicate ratio) and blended cements incorporating 50% Ground Granulated Blastfurnace Slag (GGBS) or 20% Pulverized Fuel Ash (PFA). In order to evaluate effect of solution concentrations on the deterioration of mortar specimens, the test solutions used were 0.5%, 1.5% and 5% as sodium sulfate. The resistance of mortar specimens was evaluated using visual examination, expansion and compressive strength loss measurements. Additionally, in order to classify sulfate products formed during sulfate attack, microstructural analysis such as X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) were also conducted on paste samples exposed to highly concentrated sulfate solution. Results confirmed that in additions to C3A content, Silicate Ratio (SR) of Portland cements is a critical parameter influencing sulfate resistance. Besides, the use of mineral admixtures such as GGBS and PFA led to the being beneficial in reducing the susceptibility to sodium sulfate attack. All the tests reported in the study were carried out at room temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM C 150 (2003). Standard specification for Portland cement, American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • ASTM C 1012 (2003). Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution, American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • ASTM C 109 (2003). Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars, American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • Brown, P. and Hooton, R. D. (2002). “Ettringite and thaumasite formation in laboratory concretes prepared using sulfate-resisting cements.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Building Research Establishment (1991). Sulphate and acid resistance of concrete in the ground, BRE Digest 363, Garston: Building Research Establishment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, H.T., Bucea, L., and Ray, A., and Yozghatlian, S. (1997). “The effect of cement composition and pH of environment on sulfate resistance of Portland cements and blended cements.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chindaprasirt, P., Kanchanda, P., Sathonsaowaphak, A., and Cao, H. T. (2007). “Sulfate resistance of blended cements containing fly ash and rice husk ash.” Construct. Build. Mater., Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 1356–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D. and Mather, B. (1991). “Sulfate attack on concretere-search needs.” ACI Mater. J., Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, W. H. (1992). Sulfate resistance of buried concrete, Building Research Establishment Report. Garston: Building Research Establishment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorn, S. A., Sharp, J. H., and Swamy, R. N. (1999). “Thaumasite formation in Portland-limestone cement pastes.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 1331–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorn, S. A., Sharp, J. H., and Swamy, R. N. (2002). “The thaumasite form of sulfate attack in Portland-limestone cement mortars stored in magnesium sulfate solution.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irassar, E. F., Gonzalez, M., and Rahhal, V. (2000). “Sulphate resistance of Type V cements with limestone filler and natural pozzolana.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, R. P. and Sirivivatnanon, V. (1997). “Role of permeability in sulphate attack.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 1179–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. D. (1991). “Sulphate attack on concrete.” Mag. Concr. Res., Vol. 43, No. 156, pp. 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. T., Hooton, R. D., Kim, S. S., and Kim, E. K. (2006). “Effect of fineness of high-alumina ground granulated blastfurnace slag on magnesium sulphate attack.” Mag. Concr. Res., Vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangat, P. S. and Khatib, J. M. (1995). “Influence of fly ash, silica fume, and slag on sulfate resistance of concrete.” ACI Mater. J., Vol. 92, No. 5, pp. 42–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. K. (1983). “Mechanism of sulfate attack on Portland cement concrete-another look.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. K. (1988). “Sulfate resistance of blended cements.” Proc. the Int. Workshop on the Use of Flay Ash, Slag, Silica Fume and Other Siliceous Materials in Concrete, Sydney, pp. 337–351.

  • Mehta, P. K. and Monterio, P. J. M. (2006). Concrete: Microstructure, Properties and Materials. 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, USA.

  • Moon, H. Y. and Lee, S. T. (2003). “Influence of silicate ratio and additives on the sulphate resistance of Portland cement.” Adv. Cem. Res., Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, C. and Cabrera, J. G. (1996). “The use of fly ash to improve the sulphate resistance of concrete.” Waste Manage., Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasheeduzzafar, D. F. H., Al-Amoudi, O. S. B., Abdulfauwad, S., and Maslehuddin, M. (1994). “Magnesium-sodium sulfate attack in plain and blended cements.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasheeduzzafar, D. F. H, Al-Gahtani, A. S., Al-Saadoun, S. S., and Bader, M. A. (1990). “Influence of cement composition on the corrosion of reinforcement and sulfate resistance of concrete.” ACI Mater. J., Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahmaran, M., Kasap, O., Duru, K., and Yaman, I. O. (2007). “Effects of mix composition and water-cement ratio on the sulfate resistance of blended cements.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, N. and Zayed, A. (2007). “Cement composition and sulfate attack.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 618–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, M., Cohen, M. D., and Olek, J. (2002). “Modeling the effects of solution temperature and concentration during sulfate attack on cement mortars.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, M., Cohen, M. D., and Olek, J. (2003). “Effects of gypsum formation on the performance of cement mortars during external sulfate attack.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien, B. and Cohen, M. D. (2000). “Does gypsum formation during sulfate attack on concrete lead to expansion?” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torii, K., Taniguchi, K., and Kawamura, M. (1995). “Sulfate resistance of high fly ash content concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 759–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsivilis, S., Kakali, G., Skaropoulou, A., Sharp, J. H., and Swamy, R. N. (2003). “Use of mineral admixtures to prevent thaumasite formation in limestone cement mortar.” Cem. Concr. Compos., Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 969–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, T. H., Suryavanshi, A. K., Wong, S. F., and Rahman, A. K. A. (2000). “Sulfate resistance of concrete containing mineral admixtures.” ACI Mater. J., Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 536–549.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Tae Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, ST. Performance of mortars exposed to different sulfate concentrations. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 601–609 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1054-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1054-2

Keywords

Navigation