Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive strength and durability properties of Rice Husk Ash concrete

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The paper presents the experimental investigation conducted on Rice Husk Ash (RHA) concrete to evaluate the compressive strength and to study its durability properties. In the preparation of rice husk concrete, cement was replaced at various percentage levels such as 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%. Besides control concrete was also prepared for comparison purpose. Two grades of concrete, namely M30 and M60, were prepared. The strength of the concrete increased with the levels of percentage of replacement of 10% at which the increase in strength was 7.07% at 90 days compared to normal concrete. In the case of M60 grade concrete the compressive strength increases with the addition of super plasticizer. In general, Saturated Water Absorption (SWA) increased in the case of RHA Concrete up to 10% replacement level, but the same diminished with addition of super plasticizer. The porosity of RHA Concrete decreased from 4.70% to 3.45% when the replacement level increased from 5% to 20%. There is a further decrease with the addition of super plasticizer. The chloride ion permeability value of RHA Concrete was very low between 100–1000 coulomles, as compared to normal concrete. It was observed from tests that RHA concrete was more resistant to HCl solution than that of control concrete. The percentage of resistance against alkaline attack of M30 grade RHA concrete varied from 25 to 67 and the corresponding value for M60 grade was from 35 to 70 for replacement levels varying from 5% to 20%. Addition of 20% RHA showed higher resistance against sulphate attack for both continuous soaking and cyclic conditions. On the whole addition of RHA as CRM improves the strength and durability properties of concrete to considerable extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM C642 — 06 Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete.

  • ASTM C1202 — 10 Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration.

  • de Sensale, G. R. (2006). “Strength development of concrete with ricehusk ash.” Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 28,Issue 2, pp. 158–160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • IS: 383 (1987). Specification for coarse and fine aggregate from natural sources for concrete, 8th Reprint October 1991, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 456 (2000). Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete, 4th Revision, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 516 (1959). Methods of test for strength of concrete, Amendment No. 2, Reprint 1993, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2386 (Part 3) (1963). Methods of testing for aggregates for concrete, Specific Gravity, Density, Absorption and Organic Impurities, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 4031 (1988). Method of physical test for hydraulic cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 10262 (1982). Hand book of concrete mix design, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 12269 (1987). Specification for 53 grade ordinary portland cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra V. M. (1994). “Fly ash, slag, silicafume and rice husk ash in concrete — A review.” Concrete International, pp. 23–28.

  • Mehta, P. K. (1977). “Properties of blended cements made from rice husk ash.” Journal Of American Concrete Institute, Vol. 74, No. 9, pp. 440–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta P. K. (1992). “Rice husk ash — A unique supplementary cementing materials.” Advances in Concrete Technology, Athens, Proceedings, CANMET, pp. 419–443.

  • Mehta, P. K. and Folliard, K. J. (1995). “Rice husk ash — A unique supplementary cementing material durability aspects — ACI.” SP 154-28, USA, pp. 531–541.

  • Nehdi, M., Duquette, J. and EI Damatty, A. (2003). “Performance of rice husk ash produced using a new technology as a mineral admixture in concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 33,Issue 8, pp. 1203–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rama Rao, G. V. and Seshagiri Rao, M. V. (2003). “High performance concrete with rice husk ash as mineral admixture.” Indian Concrete Institute Journal, pp. 17–21.

  • Saraswathy, V. and Song, H.-W. (2007). “Corrosion performance of rice husk ash blended concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 21, No. 8 pp. 1779–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seshagiri Rao, M. V. and Prasada Rao, A. (1995). “Durability of rice husk ash cement concrete.” Proceedings of the National Conference on Civil Engineering Material sand Structures, India, pp. 71–75.

  • Zhang, M. H. and Malhotra, V. M. (1996). “High — Performance concrete incorporating rice husk ash as a supplementary cementing material.” Materials Journal, ACI, Vol. 93, No. 6, pp. 629–636.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Ramasamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramasamy, V. Compressive strength and durability properties of Rice Husk Ash concrete. KSCE J Civ Eng 16, 93–102 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0779-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0779-2

Keywords

Navigation