Abstract
This paper presents advancements to the approach for Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) development in Korea. The current Korean TMDL process does not directly consider uncertainty and it does not include an objective approach to allocate pollutant load reductions. This paper develops a methodology to address uncertainty by incorporating a margin of safety (MOS) based on three approaches: judgment, standard error of loading characteristics, and uncertainty and variability of loading characteristics. In addition, three pollutant load reduction allocation approaches are compared to assess their impact: equal load, equal percent, and equity standard reductions. These two proposed additions to the TMDL process in Korea are demonstrated for a BOD TMDL development in the Anyangcheon Watershed. The results confirm the importance of incorporating uncertainty into the TMDL process and clearly illustrate the significant differences in TMDL and load allocation produced when using different approaches to estimate the MOS. Further, the comparison of the three load allocation strategies highlights the potential limitations of equal load and equal percent reduction approaches. The use of technical expert and decision maker ranking of factors create an equitable and sustainable load allocation among the sub-watersheds. It can be concluded that incorporating uncertainty and providing an objective load allocation strategy are essential elements needed for future TMDL development in Korea.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AQUA TERRA (2004). BASIN/HSPF Training Handbook. U.S. EPA.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle Jr., J. L., Jobes, T. H., and Donigian Jr., A. S. (2001). Hydrologic Simulation Program — Fortran (HSPF) User’s Manual for Version 12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.
Borsuk, M. E., Stow, C. A., and Reckhow, K. H. (2002). “Predicting the frequency of water quality standard violations: A probabilistic approach for TMDL development.” Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 2109–2115.
Chadderton, R., Miller, A., and McDonnell, A. (1981). “Analysis of wasteload allocation Procedures.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 760–66
Chen, C. W., Herr, J., Ziemelis, L., Goldstein, R. A., and Olmsted, L. (1999). “Decision support system for total maximum daily load.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 7, pp. 653–659.
Chung, E. S. and Lee, K. S. (2009). “Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques.” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90, No. 3, pp. 1502–1511.
Chung, E. S., Park, K., and Lee, K. S. (2011). “The relative impacts of climate change and urbanization on the hydrological response of a Korean urban watershed.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 544–560.
DePinto, J. V., Freedman, P. L., Dilks, D. M., and Larson, W. M. (2004). “Models quantify the total maximum daily load process.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 703–713.
Dilks, D. W. and Freedman, P. L. (2004). “Improved consideration of the margin of safety in total maximum daily load development.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 690–694.
Franceschini, S. and Tsai, C. W. (2008). “Incorporating reliability into the definition of the margin of safety in total maximum daily load calculations.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 34–44.
Gleick, P. (1994). “Reducing the risks of conflict over fresh water resources in the Middle East.” in Issac, J. and Shuval, H. (eds), Water and Peace in the Middle East, Amsterdam, pp. 31–54.
Jung, Y. J., Stenstrom, M. K., Jung, D. I., Kim, L. H., and Min, K. S. (2008). “National pilot projects for management of diffuse pollution in Korea.” Desalination, Vol. 226, Nos. 1–3, pp. 97–105.
Kim, K. T., Chung, E. S., Kim, S. U., and Lee, K. S. (2010). “Improvement and application of total maximum daily load management system of Korea: 2. Determination of margin of safety and allocation of pollutant loads.” Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 168–176 (in Korean).
Kim, K. T., Chung, E. S., Kim, S. U., Lee, K. S., and Sung, J. Y. (2009). “Improvement and application of total maximum daily load management system of Korea: 1. Calculation of total amount of pollutant load in the Anyangchen watershed.” Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 972–978 (in Korean).
Kim, S. U. and Lee, K. S. (2010). “Regional low flow frequency analysis using Bayesian regression and prediction at ungauged catchment in Korea.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 87–98.
Kim, Y. I. and Yi, S. J. (2006). “A study on the improvement scheme of the total water pollution load management plan.” Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 977–981 (in Korean).
Labiosa, W., Leckie, J., Shachter, R., Freyberg, D., and Trytuba, J. (2005). “Incorporating uncertainty in watershed management decision making: A mercury TMDL case.” Proc. Watershed Management Conf.: Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Lee, K. S. (2007). Rehabilitation of the hydrologic cycle in the anyangcheon watershed, Sustainable Water Resources Research Center of 21st Century Frontier Research Program. Seoul National University, Seoul (in Korean).
Lee, K. S. and Chung, E. S. (2007). “Development of integrated watershed management schemes for intensively urbanized region in Korea.” Journal of Hydro-Environmental Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 95–109.
Lee, K. S., Chung, E. S., Lee, J. S., and Hong, W. P. (2007). “Analysis of hydrologic cycle and BOD loads using HSPF in the Anyangcheon watershed.” Journal of Korean Water Resources Association, Vol. 40, No. 8, pp. 585–600 (in Korean).
Mimi, Z. A. and Sawalhi, B. I. (2003). “A decision tool for allocating the waters of the Jordan river basin between all riparian parties.” Water Resources Management, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 447–461.
Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2003). Guidebook for Total Maximum Daily Load Programs. Ministry of Environment.
New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) (1999). Methodology for Calculating Phase II Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) of Phosphorus for New York City Drinking Water Reservoirs.
Novotny, V. (1999). “Integrating diffuse/nonpoint pollution control and water body restoration into watershed management.” Journal of American Water Resources Association, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 717–727.
Novotny, V. (2004). “Simplified databased total maximum daily loads, or the world is log-normal.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 674–683.
Reckhow, K. (2003). “On the need for uncertainty assessment in TMDL modeling and implementation.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp. 245–246.
Santhi, C., Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Hauck, L. M., and Dugas, W. A. (2001). “Application of a watershed model to evaluate management effects on point and nonpoint source pollution. Transactions of ASAE, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 1559–1570.
UN (1997). Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Users of International Watercourses.
USEPA (1999). Protocol for Developing Nutrient TMDLs. USEPA.
Walker, W. W. (2003). “Consideration of variability and uncertainty in phosphorous total maximum daily loads for lakes.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp. 337–344.
Zhang, H. X. and Yu, S. L. (2004). “Applying the first-order error analysis in determining the margin of safety for total maximum daily load computations.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 664–673.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chung, ES., Kim, KT., Lee, K.S. et al. Incorporating uncertainty and objective load reduction allocation into the Total Maximum Daily Load process in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 15, 1289–1297 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-1166-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-1166-0