Skip to main content
Log in

CBR-genetic algorithm based design team selection model for large-scale design firms

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Design has always played an important role in building projects, as it affects the construction process. Selecting competent design teams is a key factor that needs to be considered for the successful completion of a design project. Applying only the limited experience and subjective judgment of humans can have a negative effect on the process of decision-making, since it is difficult to sufficiently consider all the influential factors affecting the options for a combination of teams. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated model to effectively support experiences and judgments of decision-makers. In this context, this paper employs Case Base Reasoning(CBR) based on the solutions of similar past cases along with Genetic Algorithm(GA) generating useful solutions through combinations of each individual. The CBR-Genetic Algorithm based design team selection model used for selecting appropriate design teams was developed in this study based on a literature review and an analysis of current selection processes. The developed CBR-Genetic Algorithm based design team selection model, which consists of Modules I and II, was then validated by comparing the results obtained from twelve experts with the results that were automatically selected by Module I and II through real case studies (50 multi-family completed apartment design projects). It was shown that the CBR-Genetic Algorithm based design team selection model is superior to current selection processes because it is able to select appropriate design teams tailored for a future project by simultaneously considering numerous criteria and a variety of combinations of design team possibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Ammeter, A. P. and Dukerich, J. M. (2002). “Leadership, team building, and team member characteristics in high performance project teams.” Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barczak, G. and Wilemon, D. (2003). “Team member experiences in new product development: views from the trenches.” R & D management, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, S. G., Haas, C. T., and Byrom, K. (2006). “Strategic management of human resources in construction.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. J. and Lin, L. (2004). “Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering.” IEEE transactions on engineering management, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, S. Z., Arditi, D., and Gunaydin, H. M. (2006). “Determining attribute weights in a CBR model for early cost prediction of structural systems.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 10, pp. 1092–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartenian, L. S. (2003). “Team member acquisition of team knowledge, skills, and abilities.” Team Performance Management, Vol. 9, No. 1/2, pp. 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker, P. A. (1996). “Human resources strategies for successful consulting engineering firms.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. R. (2004). “Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: improving team composition, team training, and team task design.” Human Resource Management, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 635–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, V. (2004). “Improving staff performance.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 121.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, C. W. (2007). A CBR-based hybrid model for predicting construction duration and cost based on project characteristics in multi-family housing project, Master Thesis, The University of Seoul, Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, P. (2006). “Team member involvement in team leader training and performance.” Team Performance Management, Vol. 12, No. 3/4, pp. 102–114.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R. (1997). “The constructability review process: A constructor’s perspective.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 17–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, M. and Heraty, N. (1995). “The high-performance organization: developing teamwork where it counts, Management Decision.” Quarterly Review of Management Technology, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piczak, M. W. and Hauser, R. Z. (1995). “Self-directed work teams; a guide to implementation.” Quality Progress, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. H. (1991). The healthy company: Eight strategies to develop people, productivity, and profits, St. Martin’s, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarnati, J. T. (2001). “On becoming a team player.” Team Performance Management, Vol. 7, No. 1/2, pp. 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoy, C. and Schalcher, H. R. (2007). “Residential building projects: Building cost indicators and drivers.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., LeMasters, K., and Heffring, M. (1982). Theory construction in marketing, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Chul Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, SC., Koo, KJ. CBR-genetic algorithm based design team selection model for large-scale design firms. KSCE J Civ Eng 15, 1141–1148 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0912-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0912-7

Keywords

Navigation