Skip to main content
Log in

Embodied energy: Soil retaining geosystems

  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Embodied energy is defined as the total energy in joules that can be attributed to bringing an item to its existing state. This paper attempts to quantify the amount of energy that is put into constructing geotechnical structures. In this study, several common retaining wall options are designed for (i) a hypothetical highway widening project based on a typical condition in London, (ii) basement construction of actual high rise buildings in London and (iii) embankments and cuttings as part of an actual highway road widening project. The embodied energy of each design was computed. Results show that the largest variance on embodied energy is the design solutions and within a given design the materials energy dominates over the installation energy and the transportation energy. The choice of Embodied Energy Intensity (EEI) of materials, particularly steel and concrete, is shown to have a large influence on the magnitude of embodied energy. When comparing among different designs of soil retaining structures, a recycled steel wall system generally has less embodied energy than the equivalent concrete wall system, which is more efficient than the equivalent virgin steel system. Results of the three case studies collectively indicate that minimizing materials usage is the key for reducing embodied energy in soil retention projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Architectural Institute of Japan (2003). Guideline on the lifecycle assessment of buildings, 2nd Ed. Architectural Institute of Japan.

  • BS8002 (1994). Code of practice for earth retaining structures, British Standards Institution, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau, C., Soga, K., and Nicholson, D. (2006). “Comparison of embodied energy of four different retaining wall systems.” Reuse of Foundation for Urban Sites, Proceedings of International Conference, A. D. Butcher, J. J. M. Powell, H. D. Skinner (Eds.), HIS Press, EP73, pp. 277–285.

  • Chau, C. Y. K., Soga, K., Nicholson, D., O’Riordan, N., and Inui, T. (2008). “Embodied energy as an environmental impact indicator for geotechnical basement construction.” GeoCongress 2008, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, No.178, pp. 867–874.

  • Chau, C. Y. K., Soga, K., O’Riordan, N., and Nicholson, D. (2011). “Embodied energy evaluation for sections of the CTRL.” Proceedings of the ICE — Geotechnical Engineering, (Accepted).

  • Cole, R. J. and Kernan, P. C. (1996). “Life-cycle energy use in office buildings.” Building and Environment, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay, R., Treloar, G., and Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). “Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: A case study.” Building Research and Information, Vol. 28, No.1, pp. 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guggemos, A. and Horvath, A. (2006). “Decision-support tool for assessing the environmental effects of constructing commercial buildings.” Journal of Architectural Engineering, September, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, G. P. and Jones, C. I. (2008). Inventory of (embodied) Carbon & Energy (ICE) Ver 1.6a, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N., Edwards, S., and Anderson, J. (2000). BRE methodology for environmental profiles of construction materials, components and buildings, BRE and DETR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, L., Phear, A., Nicholson, D., Pantelidou, H., Soga, K., Guthrie, P., Kidd, A., and Fraser, N. (2011). “Assessment of embodied carbon of earthworks — A bottom-up approach.” Accepted for Publication in the Proceedings of ICE, Civil Engineering.

  • Institution of Civil Engineers (1996). Specification for pile and embedded retaining walls, Thomas Telford.

  • Inui, T., Chau, C. Y. K., Soga, K., Nicholson, D., and O’Riordan, N. (2011). “Embodied energy and gas emissions of retaining wall structures.” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, (Accepted).

  • Kiani, M. (2006). The whole life environmental impact of glass within glazed commercial building envelopes, PhD Thesis, University of Brighton.

  • Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Japan (2006). Standards of cost estimation for civil constructions 2006 edition, Construction Research Institute Japan.

  • Moriguchi, Y. and Nansai, K. (1998) Energy consumption and CO 2 emission intensity based on the input-output analysis, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Environmental Agency of Japan and Kyoto University.

  • National Statistics and Defra (2006). The environment in your pocket 2006.

  • Suzuki, M. and Oka, T. (1998). “Estimation of life cycle energy consumption and CO2 emission of office buildings in Japan.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 28, pp. 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichi Soga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soga, K., Chau, C., Nicholson, D. et al. Embodied energy: Soil retaining geosystems. KSCE J Civ Eng 15, 739–749 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0013-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0013-7

Keywords

Navigation