Skip to main content
Log in

Shear connection system and performance evaluation of FRP-concrete composite deck

  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Strong composition between FRP and concrete is an indispensable prerequisite to achieve the structural integrity of FRP-concrete composite deck. Accordingly, this study evaluates experimentally the behavioral characteristics of such shear connection systems realized by coarse sand coating and concrete wedge. The results show that coarse sand coating develops composite performance close to perfect composition in the shear direction but exhibits weakness against normal split. On the other hand, concrete wedge appears to be an efficient solution to resolve such problem. Therefore, a new shear connection system combining coarse sand coating and concrete wedge has been conceived and test revealed that the new shear connection system provides equivalent static performance together with significantly improved fatigue performance compared to the coarse sand coating composition. Following, the shear connection system combining both coarse sand coating and concrete wedge constitutes an efficient solution satisfying the strong composition requirement for the structural system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bizindavyi, L. and Neale, K. W. (1999). “Transfer lengths and bond strengths for composites bonded to concrete.” Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, C. S., Nie, J., and Shi, X. M. (2007). “Interface slip effect on bonded plate repairs of concrete beams.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 29,Issue 6, pp. 1084–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chajes, M. J., Finch, W. W., Jr., Januszka, T. F., and Thonson, T. A., Jr. (1996). “Bond and force transfer of composite material plates bonded to concrete.” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. F. and Teng, J. G. (2001). “Anchorage strength models for FRP and steel plates bonded to concrete.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 7, pp.784–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, K., Cho, J. R., Chin, W. J., and Kim, B. S. (2006). “Bond-slip model for coarse sand coated interface between FRP and concrete from optimization technique.” Computers and Structures, Vol. 84,Issue 7, pp. 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. H., Lee, H. S., Park, J. M., and Kim, Y. H. (2004). “A new perfobond shear connector of composite action.” Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, KSCE, Vol. 24, No. 3A, pp. 525–532 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia, J. R., Branco, F. A., and Ferreira, J. G. (2009). “Flexural behaviour of multi-span GFRP-concrete hybrid beams.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 1369–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lorenzis, L., Miller, B., and Nanni, A. (2001). “Bond of FRP laminates to concrete.” ACI Material Journal, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 256–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deskovic N., Triantafillou T., and Meier U. (1995). “Innovative design of FRP combined with concrete: Short-term behaviour.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 7, pp. 1069–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieter, D. A., Dietsche, J. S., Bank, L. C., Oliva, M. G., and Russell, J. S. (2002). “Concrete bridge decks constructed with fiber-reinforced polymer stay-in-place forms and grid reinforcing.” Transportation Research Record 1814, No. 02-3205, pp. 219–226.

  • Keller T., Schaumann E., and Vallee T. (2007). “Flexural behavior of a hybrid FRP and lightweight concrete sandwich bridge deck.” Composites Part A, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 879–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Institute of Construction Technology. (2006). Development of long-life deck systems for bridges — steel free deck, In-House Research Project Report, KICT 2006-067 (in Korean).

  • Lee, Y. J., Boothby, T. E., Bakis, C. E., and Nanni, A. (1999). “Slip modulus of FRP sheets bonded to concrete.” Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medberry, S. B. and Shahrooz, B. M. (2002). “Perfobond shear connector for composite construction.” Engineering Journal of American Institute of Steel Construction, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Land, Transport and Marine Affairs (2007). Development of high performance construction material, Construction & Transportation R&D Report, p. 838 (in Korean).

  • Nakaba, K., Kanakubo, T., Furuta, T., and Yoshizawa, H. (2001). “Bond behavior between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete.” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 98, No. 3, pp. 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oguejiofor, E. C. and Hosain, M. U. (1997). “Numerical analysis of push-out specimens with perfobond rib connectors.” Computers and Structures, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 617–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdikaris, P. C., Petrou, M. F., and Wang, A. (1993). “Fatigue strength and stiffness of reinforced concrete bridge decks.” Ohio DOT Report, No. FHWA/OH-93/016.

  • Van Erp, G., Cattell, C., and Ayers, S. (2005). “The Australian approach to composites in civil engineering.” Reinforced Plastics, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 20–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Yuan, H., and Niu, H. (2002). “Stress transfer and fracture propagation in different kinds of adhesive joints.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 128, No. 5, pp. 562–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keunhee Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, K., Park, S.Y., Kim, S.T. et al. Shear connection system and performance evaluation of FRP-concrete composite deck. KSCE J Civ Eng 14, 855–865 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0932-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0932-8

Keywords

Navigation