Skip to main content
Log in

Development of alternative external carbon source for advanced sewage treatment system and its field applicability assessment

  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The primary focus of this research was an assessment of the external carbon source (RCS5, RCS15, and TPA5) as environmentally friendly, alternative of the carbon sources in the denitrification process. These alternative carbon sources (RCS5, RCS15, and TPA5) demonstrated the same grade of biodegradability and denitrification rate. The nitrogen removal efficiencies of RCS5, RCS15, and TPA5 in field application test were 77.4%, 58.7%, and 62.4%, respectively. The application of the alternative carbon sources (RCS5, RCS15, and TPA5) to sewage from K, N and S-STP facilities reduced the cost of an alternative carbon source more than 55.4% when compared with methanol application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Choi, E. H., Woo, H. J., Ko, J. H., Poo, K. H., and Kim, C. W. (2002). “Capacity test of various external substrates for denitrification.” Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, Vol. 24, No.9, pp. 1561–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elefsiniotis, P. and Li, D. (2006). “The effect of temperature and carbon source on denitrification using volatile fatty acids.” Biochemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y. J., Koh, H. W., Shin, W. T., and Sung, N. C. (2006). “A novel approach to an advanced tertiary wastewater treatment: Combination of a membrane bioreactor and an oyster-zeolite column.” Desalination, Vol. 190, No. 1–3, pp. 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katarzyna, K. and Bram, K. (1999). “A method to estimate denitrification potential for predenitrification systems using NUR batch test.” Water Research, Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 2291–2300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louzeiro, N. R., Mavinic, D. S., Oldham, W. K., Meisen, A., and Gardner, I. S. (2003). “Process control and design considerations for methanolinduced denitrification in a sequencing batch reactor.” Environmental Technology, Vol. 24, pp. 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora, F. R., Ferrara de Giner, G., Andara, A. R., and Esteban, J. L. (2003). “Effect of organic carbon shock loading on endogenous denitrification in sequential batch reactors.” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan, Z. X., Jin, Y. S., Yin, C. R., Lee, J. J., and Lee, S. T. (2005). “Hydrolyzed molasses as an external carbon source in biological nitrogen removal.” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 96, pp. 1690–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nakchang Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, B., Jung, I. & Sung, N. Development of alternative external carbon source for advanced sewage treatment system and its field applicability assessment. KSCE J Civ Eng 14, 149–154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0149-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0149-x

Keywords

Navigation