Skip to main content
Log in

Regional low flow frequency analysis using Bayesian regression and prediction at ungauged catchment in Korea

  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

This study employs Bayesian multiple regression analysis using the ordinary least squares method for regional low flow frequency analysis. The parameter estimates using the Bayesian multiple regression analysis were compared to conventional analysis using the t-distribution. In these comparisons, the mean values from the t-distribution and the Bayesian analysis at each return period are not significantly different. However, the difference between upper and lower limits is remarkably reduced using the Bayesian multiple regression. Therefore, from the point of view of uncertainty analysis, Bayesian multiple regression analysis is more attractive than the conventional method based on a t-distribution because the low flow sample size at the site of interest is typically insufficient to perform low flow frequency analysis. Also, we performed low flow prediction, including confidence intervals, at two ungauged catchments using the developed Bayesian multiple regression model. The Bayesian prediction proves effective to infer the low flow characteristic at the ungauged catchments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashkar, F. and Ouarda, T. B. M. J. (1998). “Approximate confidence intervals for quantiles of gamma and generalized gamma distributions.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, J. U. and Stedinger, J. R. (1991). “Confidence interval for design flood with estimated skew coefficient.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE., Vol. 117, No. 7, pp. 811–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, T. A., Lane, W. L., and Stedinger, J. R. (2001). “Confidence intervals for expected moments algorithm flood quantile estimates.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 37, No, 6, pp. 1695–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, S. G. and Powell, E. A. (1996). “Bayesian methods in extreme value modeling: A review and new developments.” International Statistical Review, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 119–136.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Durrans, S. R. and Tomic, S. (1996). “Regionalization of low-flow frequency estimates: An Alabama case study.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fill, H. D. and Stedinger, J. R. (1998). “Using regional regression within index flood procedures and an empirical Bayes estimator.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 210, pp. 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., and Fanks, S. W. (2006). “Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory.” Water Resources Research Vol. 42, W03407.

  • Kelly, K. S. and Krzysztofowicz, R. (1994). “Probability distributions for flood warning systems.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 1145–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, G. B., Lambert, M. F., and Maier, H. R. (2005). “Bayesian training of artificial neural networks used for water resources modeling.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, W12409.

  • Krzysztofowicz, R. (1983a). “Why should forecaster and a decision maker use Bayes theorem.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzysztofowicz, R. (1983b). “A Bayesian Markov model of the flood forecast process.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 1455–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera, G. (1999). “Comprehensive at-site flood frequency analysis using Monte Carlo Bayesian inference.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 1551–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera, G. and Parent, E. (1998). “Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: The Metropolis algorithm.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 211, pp. 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavesley, G. H., Lichty, R. W., Troutman, B. M., and Saindon, L. G. (1983). Precipitation-runoff modeling system: User’s manual, Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-4238, USGS, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. S. and Kim, S. U. (2008). “Identification of uncertainty in low flow frequency analysis using Bayesian MCMC method.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 22, pp. 1949–1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, H. and Rojsberg, H. D. (1997). “Generalized least squares and empirical Bayes estimation in regional partial duration series index flood modeling.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 771–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOCT and K-Water (2006). River basin investigation for the future, Kyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea (In Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, D. R. H., Ostenaa, D. A., Levish, D. R., and Klinger, R. E. (2002). “Bayesian flood frequency analysis with paleohydrologic bound data.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent, E. P. and Bernier, J. (2003). “Bayesian POT modeling for historical data.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 274, pp. 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, Jr. D. S. and Stedinger, J. R. (2005). “Bayesian MCMC flood frequency analysis with historical information.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 313, pp. 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, Jr. D. S., Stedinger, J. R., and Martins, E. S. (2005). “Bayesian generalized least squares regression with application to log Pearson type III regional skew estimation.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, W10419.

  • Seidou, O., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Barbet, M., Bruneau, P., and Bobee, B. (2006). “A parametric Bayesian combination of local and regional information in flood frequency analysis.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 42, W11408.

  • Sorensen, D. and Gianola, D. (2002). Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stedinger, J. R. (1983). “Confidence intervals for design events.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 1, pp. 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E. (1993). Frequency analysis of extreme events, In: Maidment D (Ed.) Handbook of Hydrology, McGraw-Hill, New York, Chapter 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • The MathWorks (1993). Statistics tool box user’s guide version 5, The MathWorks Inc., MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S. (2001). “Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 2521–2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicens, G. J., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. and Schaake, Jr. J. C. (1975). “A Bayesian framework for the use of regional information in hydrology.” Water Resources Research. Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S. (2003). “Shuffled complex evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 39, No. 8, SWC 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. J. (2001). “A Bayesian joint probability approach for flood record augmentation.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1707–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. J. and Hromadka, II. T. V. (1999). “Approximate confidence intervals for design floods for a single site using a neural network.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. F. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1975a). “Bayesian inference and decision making for extreme hydrologic events.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 533–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. F. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1975b). “A Bayesian approach to analyze uncertainty among flood frequency models.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 839–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B. and Govindaraju, R. S. (2000). “Prediction of watershed runoff using Bayesian concepts and modular neural networks.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 753–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Ug Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S.U., Lee, K.S. Regional low flow frequency analysis using Bayesian regression and prediction at ungauged catchment in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 14, 87–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0087-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0087-7

Keywords

Navigation