Skip to main content
Log in

Wave and storm surge simulations for Hurricane Katrina using coupled process based models

  • Coastal and Harbor Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Coupled process based model incorporating the atmosphere-wave-ocean interactions has been developed to investigate wave and storm surge in the region of extremely shallow waters. An additional shear stress, due to wave energy dissipation using the roller concept within the surface boundary layer, is introduced in this system to consider the processes of energy transfer from wind to current through wave process. Hindcast simulation of storm surge for 2005 Hurricane Katrina in this study has demonstrated the importance of energy transfer path via whitecap dissipation of wind waves in the generation mechanism of mean current in the shallow waters. It is also shown that the atmosphere-wave-ocean coupling model system using designed coupler adopted in this study is a feasible system for understanding wave and storm surge dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battjes, J.A. and Janssen, J.P.F.M. (1978). “Energy loss and set-up due to breaking in random waves.” Proceeding of the 16th International. Conference, Coastal Engineering, pp. 569–587.

  • Chalikov, D.V. and Belevich, M.Y. (1993). “One-dimensional theory of the wave boundary layer.” Bound. Layer Meteor, Vol. 63, pp. 65–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B.H., Eum, H.M., and Woo, S.B. (2003). “A synchronously coupled tide-wave-surge model of the Yellow Sea.” Coastal Engineering, Vol. 47, pp. 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, J., Sampson, C.R., Levine, A.S., and Fukada, E. (2002). The Joint Typhoon Warning Center Tropical Cyclone Best-Tracks, 1945–2000, Joint Typhoon Warning Center, NRL Reference Number: NRL/MR/7540-02-16.

  • Davis, C.A. and Low-Nam, S. (2001). The NCAR-AFWA tropical cyclone bogussing scheme, A report prepared for the Air Force Weather Agency, AFWA.

  • Deigaard, R. and Fredsoe, J. (1989). “Shear stress distribution in dissipative water waves.” Coastal Engineering, Vol. 13, pp. 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goni, G. and Trinanes, J. (2005). Gulf of Mexico surface dynamics reports, NOAA Atl. Oceanogr. and Meteorol. Lab., Miami, Fla., 29 Aug. (Available at http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/altimetry/katrina_v2.pdf)

  • Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D.R. (1994). A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398 + STR.

  • Hasselmann, K., and Coauthors (1973). “Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP).” Dtsch. Hydrogr. Zeitschr., Vol. A8, No. 12, pp. 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann, S. and Hasselmann, K. (1985). “Computations and parametrizations of the nonlinear energy transfer in a gravity wave spectrum. Part I: a new method for efficient computations of the exact nonlinear transfer integral.” Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 15, pp. 1369–1377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S.Y. and Pan, H.L. (1996). “Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model.” Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 124, pp. 2322–2339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). Climate Change 2001, IPCC Third Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press.

  • Janssen, P.A.E.M. (1991). “Quasi-linear theory of wind wave generation applied to wave forecasting.” Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 21, pp. 1631–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R.E., Cox, A., Hagen, S., Graber, H.C. and Slinn, D. (2006). “Real Time Forecasting of Waves and Surge during Hurricane Katrina.” Eos Trans. Ocean Sciences Meet. American Geophysical Union, Vol. 87, No. 36, Suppl., Abstract OS11K-02.

  • Kato, S. and Yamashita, T. (2000). “Three-dimensional model for wind, wave-induced coastal currents and its verification by ADCP observations in the nearshore zone.” Proc. 27 th Int. Conf. On Coastal Eng., ASCE, pp. 3777–3790.

  • Kim, K.O. and Yamashita, T. (2005). “Wind-wave-surge coupled model: Application to storm surge simulation in the Bay of Bengal.” Proc. of Asian and Pacific Coasts 2005, Jeju, Korea, pp. 603–606.

  • Knabb, R.D., Rhome, J.R., and Brown, D.P. (2005). Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Katrina, National Hurricane Center, NOAA. (Available at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122005_Katrina.pdf).

  • Longuet-higgins, M.S. and Stewart, R.W. (1964). “Radiation stress in water waves, a physical discussion with application.” Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 11, pp. 529–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masternbroek, C., Burgers, G., and Janssen, P.A.E.M. (1993). “The dynamical coupling of a wave model and a storm surge model through the atmospheric boundary layer.” Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 23, pp. 1856–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, G. (1998). A three-dimensional, primitive equation, numerical ocean model. Program in Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences Report. Princeton University, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, I.J. (2005). “Impact of a coupled ocean wave-tide-circulation system on coastal modeling.” Ocean Modelling. Vol. 8, pp. 203–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, R.B., Roelvink, J.A., and Southgate, H.N. (1990). Transition zone with and implications for modeling surfzone hydrodynamics, Proc. 22 nd Int. Conf. On Coastal Eng., ASCE, pp. 68–82.

  • Ozer, J., Padilla-Hernández, R., Monbaliu, J., Fanjul, E.A., Albiach, J.C.C., Osuna, P., Yu, J.C.S., and Wolf, J. (2000). “A coupling module for tides, surge and waves.” Coastal Engineering, Vol. 41, pp. 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisner, J., Rasmussen, R.M., and Bruintjes, R.T. (1998). “Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 124, pp. 1071–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelvink, J.A. and Reniers, A.J.H.M. (1994). Upgrading of a quasi-3D hydrodynamic model. Abstracts-in-depth, MAST G8-M overall workshop, Gregynog.

  • Smith, S.D. and Banke, E.G. (1975). “Variation of the sea surface drag coefficient with wind speed.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 101, pp. 665–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, H.L. and Chalikov, D.V. (1996). “Source terms in a third-generation wind-wave model.” Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 26, pp. 2497–2518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WAMDIG (1988). “The WAM model — A third generation ocean wave prediction model.” Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 18, pp. 1775–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R.J. and Slinn, D.N. (2004). “Effect of wave forces on storm surge.” Coastal Engineering 2004, World Scientific Publishing, pp. 1532–1538.

  • World Meteorological Organization (1998). Guide to Wave Analysis and Forecasting, WMO 702, Geneva.

  • Zhang, M.Y. and Li, Y.S. (1996). “The synchronous coupling of a third-generation wave model and a two-dimensional storm surge model.” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 23, pp. 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Ho Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, K.O., Lee, H.S., Yamashita, T. et al. Wave and storm surge simulations for Hurricane Katrina using coupled process based models. KSCE J Civ Eng 12, 1–8 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-008-8001-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-008-8001-2

Keywords

Navigation