Skip to main content

Teleoperated Puncture Robot System: Preliminary Design and Workspace Analysis

Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) guided by X-ray images aims to relieve herniated disc pain with minimal invasiveness and fast recovery. It requires an accurate and fast positioning of the puncture needle. We propose a teleoperated robotic system for percutaneous puncture to support RFA. We report the kinematics modelling and workspace analysis of the proposed system, which comprises preliminary and accurate positioning mechanisms. Preliminary positioning mechanism automatically drives the needle to the puncture area, and accurate positioning is then achieved by teleoperation under the guidance of X-ray images. We calculate the teleoperation workspace of the robot system using a spatial search algorithm and quantitatively analyze the optimal structural parameters aiming to maximize the workspace. The workspace of the proposed robot system complies with clinical requirements to support RFA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. [1]

    ZENG Z, YAN M, DAI Y, et al. Percutaneous bipolar radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation [J]. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2016, 30: 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    SUN R, YANG W, LIU Y, et al. Clinical study of percutaneous radiofrequency target thermocoagulation in treatment for lumbar disc herniation [J]. Orthopedic Journal of China, 2011, 19(19): 1612–1614 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    DEVITO D P, KAPLAN L, DIETL R, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot [J]. Spine, 2010, 35(24): 2109–2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    LEFRANC M, CAPEL C, PRUVOT A S, et al. The impact of the reference imaging modality, registration method and intraoperative flat-panel computed tomography on the accuracy of the ROSA® stereotactic robot [J]. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 2014, 92(4): 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    KOSTRZEWSKI S, DUFF J M, BAUR C, et al. Robotic system for cervical spine surgery [J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2012, 8(2): 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    FRANCO E, RISTIC M, REA M, et al. Robotassistant for MRI-guided liver ablation: A pilot study [J]. Medical Physics, 2016, 43(10): 5347–5356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    BALICKI M, KYNE S, TOPOREK G, et al. Design and control of an image-guided robot for spine surgery in a hybrid OR [J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2020, 16(4): e2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    LAN H, TAN Z, LI K, et al. Intramedullary nail fixation assisted by orthopaedic robot navigation for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients [J]. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2019, 11(2): 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    LIU H, DUAN S, LIU S, et al. Robot-assisted percutaneous screw placement combined with pelvic internal fixator for minimally invasive treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures [J]. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2018, 14(5): e1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    GOSSELIN C, SCHREIBER L T. Kinematically redundant spatial parallel mechanisms for singularity avoidance and large orientational workspace [J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2016, 32(2): 286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    FURQAN M, SUHAIB M, AHMAD N. Studies on Stewart platform manipulator: A review [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2017, 31(9): 4459–4470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    HU B, ZHANG L, YU J. Kinematics and dynamics analysis of a novel serial-parallel dynamic simulator [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, 30(11): 5183–5195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    KİZİR S, BİNGÜL Z. Design and development of a Stewart platform assisted and navigated transsphenoidal surgery [J]. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 2019, 27: 961–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    BONEV I A, RYU J. A geometrical method for computing the constant-orientation workspace of 6-PRRS parallel manipulators [J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2001, 36(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    ARROUK K A, BOUZGARROU B C, GOGU G. CAD-based unified graphical methodology for solving the main problems related to geometric and kinematic analysis of planar parallel robotic manipulators [J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2016, 37: 302–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    ZHOU Y, NIU J, LIU Z, et al. A novel numerical approach for workspace determination of parallel mechanisms [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2017, 31(6): 3005–3015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    SAPUTRA V B, ONG S K, NEE A Y C. A swarm optimization approach for solving workspace determination of parallel manipulators [J]. Robotica, 2015, 33(3): 649–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanping Lin.

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51575343)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, B., Lin, Y., Chen, S. et al. Teleoperated Puncture Robot System: Preliminary Design and Workspace Analysis. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-021-2368-3

Download citation

Key words

  • percutaneous puncture
  • kinematics modelling
  • Stewart platform
  • teleoperation workspace

CLC number

  • TP 242

Document code

  • A