Skip to main content
Log in

Real-Time Trajectory Planning for On-road Autonomous Tractor-Trailer Vehicles

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tractor-trailer vehicles, which are composed of a car-like tractor towing a passive trailer, have been widely deployed in the transportation industry, and trajectory planning is a critical step in enabling such a system to drive autonomously. Owing to the properties of being highly nonlinear and nonholonomic with complex dynamics, the tractor-trailer system poses great challenges to the development of motion-planning algorithms. In this study, an indirect trajectory planning framework for a tractor-trailer vehicle under on-road driving is presented to deal with the problem that the traditional planning framework cannot consider the feasibility and quality simultaneously in real-time trajectory generation of the tractor-trailer vehicle. The indirect planning framework can easily handle complicated tractor-trailer dynamics and generate high-quality, obstacle-free trajectory using quintic polynomial spline, speed profile optimization, forward simulation, and properly designed cost functions. Simulations under different driving scenarios and trajectories with different driving requirements are conducted to validate the performance of the proposed framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GONZÁLEZ-CANTOS A, OLLERO A. Backing-up maneuvers of autonomous tractor-trailer vehicles using the qualitative theory of nonlinear dynamical systems [J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2009, 28(1): 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WANG Y J, CARTMELL M P. Trajectory generation for a four wheel steering tractor-trailer system: A two-step method [J]. Robotica, 1998, 16(4): 381–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. SHAREEF Z, TRÄCHTLER A. Simultaneous path planning and trajectory optimization for robotic manipulators using discrete mechanics and optimal control [J]. Robotica, 2016, 34(6): 1322–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ZHAO H C, CHEN W, ZHOU S B, et al. Online trajectory planning for an industrial tractor towing multiple full trailers [C]//2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Paris: IEEE, 2020: 6089–6095.

    Google Scholar 

  5. LI B, ACARMAN T, ZHANG Y M, et al. Tractor-trailer vehicle trajectory planning in narrow environments with a progressively constrained optimal control approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2020, 5(3): 414–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. OLIVEIRA R, LJUNGQVIST O, LIMA P F, et al. A geometric approach to on-road motion planning for long and multi-body heavy-duty vehicles [C]//2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). [s.l.]: IEEE, 2020: 999–1006.

  7. BOLZERN P, DESANTIS R M, LOCATELLI A, et al. Path-tracking for articulated vehicles with off-axle hitching [J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1998, 6(4): 515–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BUSHNELL L, MIRTICH B, SAHAI A, et al. Off-tracking bounds for a car pulling trailers with kingpin hitching [C]//Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. Lake Buena Vista, FL: IEEE, 1994: 2944–2949.

    Google Scholar 

  9. LAMIRAUX F, BONNAFOUS D, VAN GEEM C. Path optimization for nonholonomic systems: Application to reactive obstacle avoidance and path planning [M]//Control problems in robotics. Heidelberg: Springer, 2003: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. EVESTEDT N, LJUNGQVIST O, AXEHILL D. Motion planning for a reversing general 2-trailer configuration using Closed-Loop RRT [C]//2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Daejeon: IEEE, 2016: 3690–3697.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LIMA P F. Optimization-based motion planning and model predictive control for autonomous driving: With experimental evaluation on a heavy-duty construction truck [D]. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ALTAFINI C. Some properties of the general n-trailer [J]. International Journal of Control, 2001, 74(4): 409–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. ALTAFINI C. Following a path of varying curvature as an output regulation problem [J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2002, 47(9): 1551–1556.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. FAN H Y, ZHU F, LIU C C, et al. Baidu Apollo EM motion planner [EB/OL]. [2020-12-20]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.08048.pdf.

  15. TAKAHASHI A, HONGO T, NINOMIYA Y, et al. Local path planning and motion control for AGV in positioning [C]//IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Tsukuba: IEEE, 1989: 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WERLING M, ZIEGLER J, KAMMEL S, et al. Optimal trajectory generation for dynamic street scenarios in a Frenét Frame [C]//2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Anchorage, AK: IEEE, 2010: 987–993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. STELLATO B, BANJAC G, GOULART P, et al. OSQP: An operator splitting solver for quadratic programs [C]//2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL). Sheffield: IEEE, 2018: 339.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunxiang Wang  (王春香).

Additional information

Foundation item

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61873165/U1764264), and the Shanghai Automotive Industry Science and Technology Development Foundation (No. 1807)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, Q., Wang, B. & Wang, C. Real-Time Trajectory Planning for On-road Autonomous Tractor-Trailer Vehicles. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 26, 722–730 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-021-2362-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-021-2362-9

Key words

CLC number

Document code

Navigation