Skip to main content
Log in

Formability of Printing Ink for Melt Electrowriting

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3D printing, also called additive manufacturing, is being used increasingly in tissue engineering. However, the printing accuracy remains limited, making it difficult to prepare a tissue engineering scaffold with high precision and high porosity. Melt electrowriting (MEW) technology is based on extrusion printing, in which an extruded material is pulled by the action of an electric field, thereby reducing the fiber diameter and improving the printing accuracy. However, MEW technology imposes high requirements on the material properties, and therefore, few printing materials are currently available for use in this process. The present study investigates the characteristics and molding conditions of polycaprolactone, a commonly used printing material, as well as other materials such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate/polyethylene oxide, gelatin methacrylate, and hyaluronic acid methacrylate for MEW applications, and develops new and suitable inks for MEW that will provide more and better choices for constructing a bioactive scaffold in future tissue engineering research. Experiments suggest that a printing ink should have low electrical conductivity, suitable viscosity, and high curing speed for realizing successful printing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CHEN L, DENG C J, LI J Y, et al. 3D printing of a lithium-calcium-silicate crystal bioscaffold with dual bioactivities for osteochondral interface reconstruction [J]. Biomaterials, 2019, 196: 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GAO Q, NIU X F, SHAO L, et al. 3D printing of complex GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay [J]. Biofabrication, 2019, 11(3): 035006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. HEWITT E, MROS S, MCCONNELL M, et al. Meltelectrowriting with novel milk protein/PCL biomaterials for skin regeneration [J]. Biomedical Materials (Bristol, England), 2019, 14(5): 055013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. HOCHLEITNER G, FÜRSATTEL E, GIESA R, et al. Melt electrowriting of thermoplastic elastomers [J]. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2018, 39(10): 1800055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. JØRGENSEN M L, MÜLLER C, SIKKERSOQ M, et al. A melt-electrowritten filter for capture and culture of circulating colon cancer cells [J]. Materials Today Bio, 2020, 6: 100052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. HRYNEVICH A, ELÇI B Ş, HAIGH J N, et al. Dimension-based design of melt electrowritten scaffolds [J]. Small, 2018, 14(22): 1800232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CHEN H, MALHEIRO A B F B, VAN BLITTERSWIJK C, et al. Direct writing electrospinning of scaffolds with multidimensional fiber architecture for hierarchical tissue engineering [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(44): 38187–38200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. TOWNSEND J M, OTT L M, SALASH J R, et al. Reinforced electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers for tracheal repair in an in vivo ovine model [J]. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2018, 24(17/18): 1301–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DALTON P D, WOODFIELD T B F, MIRONOV V, et al. Advances in hybrid fabrication toward hierarchical tissue constructs [J]. Advanced Science, 2020, 7(11): 1902953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PAXTON N C, LANARO M, BO A, et al. Design tools for patient specific and highly controlled melt electrowritten scaffolds [J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2020, 105: 103695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LEE J W, PARK J Y, PARK S H, et al. Cross-linked electrospun cartilage acellular matrix/poly(caprolactone-co-lactide-co-glycolide) nanofiber as an antiadhesive barrier [J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2018, 74: 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. BAS O, DE-JUAN-PARDO E M, MEINERT C, et al. Biofabricated soft network composites for cartilage tissue engineering [J]. Biofabrication, 2017, 9(2): 025014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. WUNNER F M, WILLE M L, NOONAN T G, et al. Melt electrospinning writing of highly ordered large volume scaffold architectures [J]. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(20): 1706570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. QI H F, YE Z H, REN H L, et al. Bioactivity assessment of PLLA/PCL/HAP electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering [J]. Life Sciences, 2016, 148: 139–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZEUGOLIS D I, KHEW S T, YEW E S Y, et al. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nano-fibres: Just an expensive way to make gelatin? [J]. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(15): 2293–2305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. WEI C, DONG J Y. Hybrid hierarchical fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2014, 16(2): 257–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. PUCKERT C, TOMASKOVIC-CROOK E, GAMBHIR S, et al. Electro-mechano responsive properties of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogel on conducting polymer electrodes quantified using atomic force microscopy [J]. Soft Matter, 2017, 13(27): 4761–4772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenbo Jiang  (姜闻博) or Kerong Dai  (戴尅戎).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Key R&D Program of China (Nos. 2018YFB1105600 and 2018YFA0703000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81802131), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019T120347)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, Y., Sun, B., Jiang, W. et al. Formability of Printing Ink for Melt Electrowriting. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 26, 411–415 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-021-2313-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-021-2313-5

Key words

CLC number

Document code

Navigation