Crowd evacuation in different situations is an important topic in the research field of safety. This paper presents a hybrid model for heterogeneous pedestrian evacuation simulation. Our adaptive agent-based model (ABM) combines the strength of human crowd behavior description from classical social force models with discrete dynamics expression from cellular automaton models by extending the conception of floor field. Several important factors which may influence the results of decision-making of pedestrians are taken into consideration, such as the location of sign, the attraction of exit, and the interaction among pedestrians. To compare the effect of information on the pedestrians, we construct three decision-making mechanisms with different assumptions. To validate these three simulation models, we compare the numerical results from different perspectives with rational range in the case study where the Tampere Theater evacuation was carried out. The ABM framework is open for rules modification and could be applied to different building plans and has implication for architectural design of gates and signs in order to increase the evacuation efficiency.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
GWYNNE S, GALEA E R, OWEN M, et al. A review of the methodologies used in the computer simulation of evacuation from the built environment [J]. Building and Environment, 1999, 34(6): 741–749.
TEKNOMO K, TAKEYAMA Y, INAMURA H. Review on microscopic pedestrian simulation model [C]//Proceedings Japan Society of Civil Engineering Conference. Morioka, Japan: Japan Society of Civil Engineering, 2000: 1–2.
KOK V J, LIM M K, CHAN C S. Crowd behavior analysis: A review where physics meets biology [J]. Neurocomputing, 2016, 177: 342–362.
ADRIAN J, BODE N, AMOS M, et al. A glossary for research on human crowd dynamics [J]. Collective Dynamics, 2019, 4: A19.
ZHENG X P, ZHONG T K, LIU M T. Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches [J]. Building and Environment, 2009, 44(3): 437–445.
AL-NABHAN N, AL-ABOODY N, ALIM AL ISLAM A B M. A hybrid IoT-based approach for emergency evacuation [J]. Computer Networks, 2019, 155: 87–97.
HELBING D, MOLNÁR P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics [J]. Physical Review E, 1995, 51(5): 4282.
HELBING D, TILCH B. Generalized force model of traffic dynamics [J]. Physical Review E, 1998, 58(1): 133.
FREDKIN E, TOFFOLI T. Conservative logic [J]. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 1982, 21(3/4): 219–253.
BLUE V J, ADLER J L. Cellular automata microsimulation for modeling bi-directional pedestrian walkways [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2001, 35(3): 293–312.
HENDERSON L F. The statistics of crowd fluids [J]. Nature, 1971, 229(5284): 381–383.
HA V, LYKOTRAFITIS G. Agent-based modeling of a multi-room multi-floor building emergency evacuation [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2012, 391(8): 2740–2751.
LO S M, HUANG H C, WANG P, et al. A game theory based exit selection model for evacuation [J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2006, 41(5): 364–369.
SALOMA C, PEREZ G J, TAPANG G, et al. Self-organized queuing and scale-free behavior in real escape panic [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(21): 11947–11952.
LEWIN K. Field theory in social science [J]. The American Catholic Sociological Review, 1951, 12(2): 103–104.
JOHANSSON F, PETERSON A, TAPANI A. Waiting pedestrians in the social force model [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2015, 419: 95–107.
LI W H, GONG J H, YU P, et al. Simulation and analysis of congestion risk during escalator transfers using a modified social force model [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2015, 420: 28–40.
HAN Y B, LIU H. Modified social force model based on information transmission toward crowd evacuation simulation [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2017, 469: 499–509.
FARINA F, FONTANELLI D, GARULLI A, et al. Walking ahead: The headed social force model [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1): e0169734.
LIU B, LIU H, ZHANG H, et al. A social force evacuation model driven by video data [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2018, 84: 190–203.
PELECHANO N, ALLBECK J M, BADLER N I. Controlling individual agents in high-density crowd simulation [C]//ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation. San Diego, USA: ACM, 2007: 99–108.
HAGHANI M, SARVI M. Crowd behaviour and motion: Empirical methods [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2018, 107: 253–294.
KRETZ T. On oscillations in the social force model [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2015, 438: 272–285.
WENG W G, CHEN T, YUAN H Y, et al. Cellular automaton simulation of pedestrian counter flow with different walk velocities [J]. Physical Review E, 2006, 74: 036102.
SONG W G, YU Y F, WANG B H, et al. Evacuation behaviors at exit in CA model with force essentials: A comparison with social force model [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2006, 371(2): 658–666.
YANG L Z, ZHAO D L, LI J, et al. Simulation of evacuation behaviors in fire using spacial grid [J]. Progress in Natural Science, 2004, 14(7): 614–618.
GUO Y W, MILEHAM A R, OWEN G W, et al. Operation sequencing optimization for five-axis prismatic parts using a particle swarm optimization approach [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2009, 223(5): 485–497.
LU L L, CHAN C Y, WANG J, et al. A study of pedestrian group behaviors in crowd evacuation based on an extended floor field cellular automaton model [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 81: 317–329.
PEREIRA L A, BURGARELLI D, DUCZMAL L H, et al. Emergency evacuation models based on cellular automata with route changes and group fields [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2017, 473: 97–110.
CZERNIAK J M, ZARZYCKI H, APIECIONEK L, et al. A cellular automata-based simulation tool for real fire accident prevention [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018: 1–12.
GOLDSTONE R L, JANSSEN M A. Computational models of collective behavior [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2005, 9(9): 424–430.
LUBAŚ R, MYCEK M, PORZYCKI J, et al. Verification and validation of evacuation models-methodology expansion proposition [J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2014, 2: 715–723.
MACAL C M. Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation [J]. Journal of Simulation, 2016, 10(2): 144–156.
MARZOUK M, MOHAMED B. Integrated agent-based simulation and multi-criteria decision making approach for buildings evacuation evaluation [J]. Safety Science, 2019, 112: 57–65.
BONABEAU E. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems [J]. PNAS, 2002, 99(Sup. 3): 7280–7287.
AL HATTAB M, HAMZEH F. Simulating the dynamics of social agents and information flows in BIM-based design [J]. Automation in Construction, 2018, 92: 1–22.
POULOS A, TOCORNAL F, DE LA LLERA J C, et al. Validation of an agent-based building evacuation model with a school drill [J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 97: 82–95.
HELBING D, FARKAS I, VICSEK T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic [J]. Nature, 2000, 407(6803): 487–490.
PAN X, HAN C S, DAUBER K, et al. A multi-agent based framework for the simulation of human and social behaviors during emergency evacuations [J]. AI & Society, 2007, 22(2): 113–132.
FANG J, EL-TAWIL S, AGUIRRE B. Leader-follower model for agent based simulation of social collective behavior during egress [J]. Safety Science, 2016, 83: 40–47.
KASEREKA S, KASORO N, KYAMAKYA K, et al. Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation for evacuation of people from a building in case of fire [J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2018, 130: 10–17.
HELBING D, BROCKMANN D, CHADEFAUX T, et al. Saving human lives: What complexity science and information systems can contribute [J]. Journal of Statistical Physics, 2015, 158(3): 735–781.
BELLOMO N, CLARKE D, GIBELLI L, et al. Human behaviours in evacuation crowd dynamics: From modelling to “big data” toward crisis management [J]. Physics of Life Reviews, 2016, 18: 1–21.
CHRAIBI M, TORDEUX A, SCHADSCHNEIDER A, et al. Modelling of pedestrian and evacuation dynamics [M]//Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Berlin: Springer, 2018: 1–22.
SHI J, REN A, CHEN C. Agent-based evacuation model of large public buildings under fire conditions [J]. Automation in Construction, 2009, 18(3): 338–347.
ZARBOUTIS N, MARMARAS N. Searching efficient plans for emergency rescue through simulation: The case of a metro fire [J]. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2004, 6(2): 117–126.
TOYAMA M C, BAZZAN A L C, DA SILVA R. An agent-based simulation of pedestrian dynamics: From lane formation to auditorium evacuation [C]//Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Hakodate, Japan: ACM, 2006: 108–110.
KAN Z Q, YU C C, TAN L, et al. Simulation of evacuation based on multi-agent and cellular automaton [C]//2011 International Conference on Mechatronic Science, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC). Jilin: IEEE, 2011: 550–553.
TAN L, HU M, LIN H. Agent-based simulation of building evacuation: Combining human behavior with predictable spatial accessibility in a fire emergency [J]. Information Sciences, 2015, 295: 53–66.
LIU Z, JACQUES C C, SZYNISZEWSKI S, et al. Agent-based simulation of building evacuation after an earthquake: Coupling human behavior with structural response [J]. Natural Hazards Review, 2016, 17(1): 04015019.
LUJAK M, GIORDANI S. Centrality measures for evacuation: Finding agile evacuation routes [J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2018, 83: 401–412.
KIM H, HAN S. Crowd evacuation simulation using active route choice model based on human characteristics [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2018, 87: 369–378.
WILLIAMS R A. Lessons learned on development and application of agent-based models of complex dynamical systems [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2018, 83: 201–212.
CIMELLARO G P, MAHIN S, DOMANESCHI M. Integrating a human behavior model within an agent-based approach for blasting evacuation [J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2019, 34(1): 3–20.
GUTIERREZ-MILLA A, BORGES F, SUPPI R, et al. Crowd evacuations SaaS: An ABM approach [J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 51: 473–482.
BURSTEDDE C, KLAUCK K, SCHADSCHNEIDER A, et al. Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two-dimensional cellular automaton [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2001, 295(3/4): 507–525.
SIEBERS P O, MACAL C M, GARNETT J, et al. Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! [J]. Journal of Simulation, 2010, 4(3): 204–210.
KAJI M, INOHARA T. Cellular automaton simulation of unidirectional pedestrians flow in a corridor to reproduce the unique velocity profile of Hagen-Poiseuille flow [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2017, 467: 85–95.
GRIMM V, REVILLA E, BERGER U, et al. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology [J]. Science, 2005, 310(5750): 987–991.
ZHAO L, YANG G, WANG W, et al. Herd behavior in a complex adaptive system [J]. PNAS, 2011, 108(37): 15058–15063.
JONES J E. On the determination of molecular fields: I. From the variation of the viscosity of a gas with temperature [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 1924, 106(738): 441–462.
WAGNER N, AGRAWAL V. An agent-based simulation system for concert venue crowd evacuation modeling in the presence of a fire disaster [J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2014, 41(6): 2807–2815.
LUBAŚ R, MILLER J, MYCEK M, et al. Three different approaches in pedestrian dynamics Modeling: A case study [M]//New results in dependability and computer systems. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 285–294.
TO K, LAI P Y, PAK H K. Jamming of granular flow in a two-dimensional hopper [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 86(1): 71–74.
TO K. Jamming transition in two-dimensional hoppers and silos [J]. Physical Review E, 2005, 71: 060301.
TANG J, SAGDIPHOUR S, BEHRINGER R P. Jamming and flow in 2D hoppers [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2009, 1145: 515–518.
Foundation item: the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 18ZR1420200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61603253), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (No. 2016M601598)
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, F., Zhao, Q., Cao, M. et al. Adaptive Agent-Based Modeling Framework for Collective Decision-Making in Crowd Building Evacuation. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 26, 522–533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-021-2287-3
- adaptive agent-based model
- evacuation simulation
- TP 301.6