Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Micro-Milling and Laser Engraving on Processing Quality and Implantation Mechanics of PEG-Dexamethasone Coated Neural Probe

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compared with stiff silicon-based probes, flexible neural probes can alleviate biological inflammation and tissue rejection. A polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating can facilitate the insertion of flexible probes, and the fabrication methods have a significant impact on the dimensional accuracy and structural strength of the coating. In this study, a novel melting injection moulding method is used to process a PEG-dexamethasone (PEG-DEX) coating with high structural strength for a type of mesh-shaped photosensitive polyimide (PSPI) based neural probe. Combined with the digital image correlation (DIC) method, an in vitro test system with high accuracy is developed to evaluate the effects of the elastic modulus of the PEG component and two fabrication methods, i.e., computer-numerical-control (CNC) micro-milling and laser engraving, on the processing quality and implantation mechanics of a PEG-DEX coated probe. The results show that compared with laser engraving, CNC micro-milling can ensure high dimensional accuracy and sharpness for the composite coating, thus leading to small damage from implantation, whereas the elastic modulus of the composite coating has a limited effect on the implantation mechanics of the PEG-DEX coated probe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DONOGHUE J P. Bridging the brain to the world: A perspective on neural interface systems [J]. Neuron, 2008, 60(3): 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. KOZAI T D Y, JAQUINS-GERSTL A S, VAZQUEZ A L, et al. Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies [J]. ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 2015, 6(1): 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. LECOMTE A, DESCAMPS E, BERGAUD C. A review on mechanical considerations for chronically-implanted neural probes [J]. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2018, 15: 031001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ZHOU T, HONG G S, FU T M, et al. Syringe-injectable mesh electronics integrate seamlessly with minimal chronic immune response in the brain [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(23): 5894–5899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ORTIGOZA-DIAZ J, SCHOLTEN K, LARSON C, et al. Techniques and considerations in the microfabrication of Parylene C microelectromechanical systems [J]. Micromachines, 2018, 9(9): 422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CEYSSENS F, WELKENHUYSEN M, PUERS R. Anisotropic etching in (3 1 1) Si to fabricate sharp resorbable polymer microneedles carrying neural electrode arrays [J]. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2019, 29: 027001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LECOMTE A, CASTAGNOLA V, DESCAMPS E, et al. Silk and PEG as means to stiffen a parylene probe for insertion in the brain: Toward a double time-scale tool for local drug delivery [J]. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2015, 25: 125003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WELTMAN A, YOO J, MENG E. Flexible, penetrating brain probes enabled by advances in polymer microfabrication [J]. Micromachines, 2016, 7(10): 180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. XIANG Z L, YEN S C, XUE N, et al. Ultra-thin flexible polyimide neural probe embedded in a dissolvable maltose-coated microneedle [J]. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2014, 24(6): 065015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. TIEN L W, WU F, TANG-SCHOMER M D, et al. Silk as a multifunctional biomaterial substrate for reduced glial scarring around brain-penetrating electrodes [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2013, 23(25): 3185–3193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. BEDIZ B, KORKMAZ E, KHILWANI R, et al. Dissolvable microneedle arrays for intradermal delivery of biologics: Fabrication and application [J]. Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 31(1): 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. TAKMAKOV P, RUDA K, PHILLIPS S K, et al. Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species [J]. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2015, 12(2): 026003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MESA-MÚNERA E, RAMÍREZ-SALAZAR J F, BOULANGER P, et al. Inverse-FEM characterization of a brain tissue phantom to simulate compression and indentation [J]. Ingeniería y Ciencia, 2012, 8(16): 11–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. TANG J Q, ZHANG W G, CAI F L, et al. A comparative study on tissue injury caused by implantation based on electrode with the capability of micro-motion attenuation [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2018, 52(2): 188–193 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. ZHANG W G, MA Y K, LI Z W. Experimental evaluation of neural probe’s insertion induced injury based on digital image correlation method [J]. Medical Physics, 2016, 43(1): 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ZHANG W G, TANG J Q, LI Z W, et al. A novel neural electrode with micro-motion-attenuation capability based on compliant mechanisms: Physical design concepts and evaluations [J]. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2018, 56(10): 1911–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. JEE A Y, LEE H, LEE Y, et al. Determination of the elastic modulus of poly(ethylene oxide) using a photoisomerizing dye [J]. Chemical Physics, 2013, 422: 246–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. LEE H C, EJSERHOLM F, GAIRE J, et al. Histological evaluation of flexible neural implants; flexibility limit for reducing the tissue response? [J]. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2017, 14(3): 036026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the technical support from the Instrumental Analysis Center of Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Xuhui Zhou  (周旭辉), Wenguang Zhang  (张文光) & Jie Xie  (谢颉)

Authors
  1. Xuhui Zhou  (周旭辉)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenguang Zhang  (张文光)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jie Xie  (谢颉)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenguang Zhang  (张文光).

Additional information

Foundation item

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51675330)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Zhang, W. & Xie, J. Effects of Micro-Milling and Laser Engraving on Processing Quality and Implantation Mechanics of PEG-Dexamethasone Coated Neural Probe. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 26, 1–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-020-2243-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-020-2243-7

Key words

CLC number

Document code

Search

Navigation