Skip to main content
Log in

Safety Evaluation Method for Long-Term Operation of Metro Based on Combination Weighting Method

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metros are critical infrastructure in big cities and evaluation of their safe operation is of increasing importance. To make a reasonable safety evaluation for the metro during operation, this paper establishes a rational safety evaluation model based on long-term monitoring data of Shanghai Metro Line 2. Four evaluation indicators, i.e., absolute settlement, relative curvature, deformation rate and curvature radius, are adopted. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method are combined to determine the weights of the indicators. The risk level values at different mileage are calculated and five danger levels are defined accordingly to determine the safety state of Shanghai Metro Line 2, i.e., safe, relatively safe, critical, relatively dangerous, and dangerous. Safety evaluation of Shanghai Metro Line 2 shows that: 83.81% areas of Shanghai Metro Line 2 are in safe, relatively safe and critical states, while 15.63% and 0.57% areas are in relatively dangerous and dangerous states, respectively; the parts of Shanghai Metro Line 2 where the risk level value exceeds the critical value are mainly distributed around the mileage at 6.0–7.5 km and 8.5–11.0 km, and the risk level value peaks around the mileage at 7.3 km, in which high attention should be attached and relevant protective measures be taken; the sections with the high risk level value coincide with the distinctly deforming areas of the metro, indicating that this evaluation method is valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OCAK I. Control of surface settlements with umbrella arch method in second stage excavations of Istanbul Metro [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2008, 23(6): 674–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. SADAGHIANI M H, DADIZADEH S. Study on the effect of a new construction method for a large span metro underground station in Tabriz-Iran [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2010, 25(1): 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AVCI O, OZBULUT O. Threat and vulnerability risk assessment for existing subway stations: A simplified approach [J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2018, 6(4): 663–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HUANG H W, YE Y F, HU Q F. Analysis on the current situation of risk management on metro operation safety [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(7): 55–62 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. LI X J. Analysis on the safety risk of subway operation [J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2017, 31(1): 83–88 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. TAGUCHI M, KAWAKAMI K, KONISHI S, et al. Development of maintenance indicator to evaluate soundness of subway tunnels [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 165: 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. XU T K. Study on risk assessment theory and methods on urban rail transit net work operation [D]. Beijing, China: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2012 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. WANG Y H, HUANG Y K, LI M. Evaluation of urban rail transit line operational safety based on combination weighing method [J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2013, 41(8): 1243–1248 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. PANG T. Research on standard system of metro operation safety [D]. Sichuan, China: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2017 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. ZHANG H Y. Urban rail transit safety evaluation and countermeasures research [D]. Lanzhou, China: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2013 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. SAATY T L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures [J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 15(3): 234–281.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. KANCHANA J, PRASATH V, KRISHNARAJ V, et al. Multi response optimization of process parameters using grey relational analysis for milling of hardened Custom 465 steel [J]. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, 30: 451–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SKULMOSKI G J, HARTMAN F T, KRAHN J. The Delphi method for graduate research [J]. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2007, 6(1): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  14. SONG G X, YANG D L. Combination weighting approach based on the decision-maker’s preference and consistency of weighting methods [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26(9): 1226–1229 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. JIA S K, WEN X H, LIN D J, et al. Study on safety assessment techniques for subway operation system based on analytic hierarchy process [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(5): 137–141 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. LIANG G L, XU W Y, TAN X L. Application of extension theory based on entropy weight to rock quality evaluation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(2): 535–540 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shanghai Municipal Engineering Administration Bureau. Interim provisions on the management of metro protection for construction protection along the shanghai metro line [EB/CD]. (2018-3-5) [2019-10-12]. http://dtjh.shmetro.com/MMSW/front/lookLaws/4 (in Chinese).

  18. RAN A L, LI M G, CHEN J J, et al. Deformation behaviors of joint between shield tunnel and underground station impacted by connected deep foundation pit [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2016, 36(7): 844–850 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. LIU T J. Study on control values of bending moment and deformation of shield-bored metro tunnels [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2010, 30(Sup. 1): 109–112 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. SHANNON C E. A mathematical theory of communication [J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3): 379–423.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingguang Li  (李明广).

Additional information

Foundation item

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41602283 and 41977216), and the Science and Technology Rising-Star Program of Shanghai (No. 19QC1400800)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, W., Li, M., Wu, W. et al. Safety Evaluation Method for Long-Term Operation of Metro Based on Combination Weighting Method. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 25, 700–705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-020-2230-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-020-2230-z

Key words

CLC number

Document code

Navigation