Abstract
Previous literature on price limit offers mixed empirical evidence on the effectiveness of price limits. This study complements the literature by providing a quasi-natural experiment to study the performance of price limit. We examine the effectiveness of price limit rule using cross-listed stocks in the Chinese stock markets and Hong Kong stock market. We find that the influence of price limit becomes weaker as limit-hitting stocks are traded more actively. Among stocks with high trading activity, the delay of efficient price discovery, the volatility spillover and the trading interference become statistically insignificant. This challenges the views of price limit critics. Additionally, we find that the effect of price limits on the trading is asymmetric for A-shares in the upward and downward price movements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANSHUMAN V R, SUBRAHMANYAM A. Price limits, information acquisition and bid-ask spreads: Theory and evidence [J]. Economic Notes, 1999, 28(1): 91–118.
DEB S S, KALEV P S, MARISETTY V B. Are price limits really bad for equity markets? [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010, 34(10): 2462–2471.
LEHMANN B N. Commentary: Volatility, price resolution, and the effectiveness of price limits [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1989, 3: 205–209.
GEORGE T J, HWANG C Y. Transitory price changes and price-limit rules: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1995, 30(2): 313–327.
CHO D D, RUSSELL J, TIAO G C, et al. The magnet effect of price limits: Evidence from high-frequency data on Taiwan Stock Exchange [J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2003, 10(1/2): 133–168.
HSIEH P H, KIM Y H, YANG J J. The magnet effect of price limits: A logit approach [J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2009, 16(5): 830–837.
KIM K A, RHEE S G. Price limit performance: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange [J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(2): 885–901.
KIM K A, LIU H, YANG J J. Reconsidering price limit effectiveness [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2013, 36(4): 493–518.
ROLL R. Price volatility, international market links, and their implications for regulatory policies [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1989, 3: 211–246.
LAUTERBACH B, BEN-ZION U. Stock market crashes and the performance of circuit breakers: Empirical evidence [J]. Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(5): 1909–1925.
ABAD D, PASCUAL R. On the magnet effect of price limits [J]. European Financial Management, 2007, 13(5): 833–852.
PHYLAKTIS K, KAVUSSANOS M, MANALIS G. Price limits and stock market volatility in the Athens Stock Exchange [J]. European Financial Management, 1999, 5(1): 69–84.
MA C K, RAO R P, SEARS R S. Volatility, price resolution, and the effectiveness of price limits [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1989, 3: 165–199.
MA C K, RAO R P, SEARS R S. Limit moves and price resolution: The case of the treasury bond futures market [J]. Journal of Futures Market, 1989, 9(4): 321–335.
SUBRAHMANYAM A. Circuit breakers and market volatility: A theoretical perspective [J]. Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(1): 237–254.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, L. Performance of price limits: Evidence from cross-listed stocks in China. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 21, 247–256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1719-y
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1719-y