Skip to main content
Log in

China and emerging economies in global financial governance: Legitimacy, accountability and democracy

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global financial governance refers to the way in which global financial affairs are managed. As there is no global government, global financial governance typically involves a range of actors including states, as well as regional and international organizations aimed at negotiating responses to problems that affect more than one state or region, far from only providing the public good of financial stability through global economy integration and global financial legislation. In geopolitical context of the 21st century, emerging economies still have maintained a low profile in global financial governance, despite their growing economic power and the rhetoric of being a responsible great power, and there is little evidence that they will seek international leadership. Moreover, compared to the other emerging powers in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) group, China has under-participated in global governance in terms of contributing personnel, finance and ideas to major multilateral institutions and programs. It is really an interesting question in international economics and politics area. Firstly, this paper examines comparative data on the emerging economies countries’ participation in global financial governance and explains the reason why China has relatively low involvement in global financial governance. Secondly, this paper analyzes norms and legitimacy in global financial governance, and thus outlines the emerging economies constraints on public policy of global financial market integration in the light of the foregoing analysis of legitimacy, accountability and democracy. Finally, some global financial governance development strategy and possible policy solutions are discussed as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. STEPHEN M D. “Can you pass the salt?” The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech [J]. European Journal of International Relations, 2015, 21(4): 768–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MADHUR S. Asia’s role in twenty-first-century global economic governance [J]. International Affairs, 2012, 88(4): 817–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. GRABEL I. Global financial governance and development finance in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis [J]. Feminist Economics, 2013, 19(3): 32–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. HELD D, ROGER C, NAG E-M. Climate governance in the developing world [M]. Cambridge, UK Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BRUNNERMEIER M, CROCKETT A, GOODHART C, et al. The fundamental principles of financial regulation[R]. Geneva: International Centre for Monetary and Banking Studies, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. SUCHMAN M C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  7. BUCHANAN A, KEOHANE R O. The legitimacy of global governance institutions [J]. Ethics and International Affairs, 2006, 20(4): 405–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. STEPHEN M D, FOOT R, WALTER A, et al. States, norms and power: Emerging powers and global order [J]. Journal of International Studies, 2014, 42(3): 888–896.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yamin Li  (李亚敏).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Wang, H. China and emerging economies in global financial governance: Legitimacy, accountability and democracy. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 21, 199–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1712-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1712-5

Keywords

CLC number

Document code

Navigation