Skip to main content
Log in

Formal or informal? The dispute settlement mechanisms of China’s free trade agreements

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) has long been the focus of attention because of its significant role in the institutional construction of China’s free trade agreements (FTAs). Thus, this paper is to make an analysis of the DSMs of China’s established FTAs from a legal perspective of international regime study, which leads to the finding of a co-existence mode of formal and informal DSMs in China’s FTAs. This paper also discusses the motivation and significance of such a choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DA Z G. Risks, challenges and effective approaches of China’s FTAs [J]. Foreign Trade, 2013, 21(1): 8–10 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. China FTA network [EB/OL]. (2015-12-10) [2015-12-01]. http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/english/index.shtml.

  3. China-ASEAN Center. Economy and trade of China and ASEAN in 2014 [EB/OL]. (2015-06-29) [2015-03-16] http://www.asean-china-center.org/015-03/16/c 134071065.htm.

  4. LI Y T. Impact of the China-New Zealand FTA on China’s agriculture and policy suggestion [J]. Agricultural Economy, 2011, 28(5): 106–109 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. KRASNER S D. Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables [C]// International Regimes. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. PUCHALA D J, HOPKINS R F. International regimes: Lessons from inductive analysis [C]//International Regimes. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005: 61–91.

    Google Scholar 

  7. LIU H S. On the concepts of formal and informal international regimes [J]. Chinese Journal of European Studies, 2009, 27(3): 91–106 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. ABBOTT K W, KEOHAN R O, MORAVCSIK A, et al. The concept of legalization [J]. International Organization, 2000, 54(3): 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SHAFFER G, POLLACK M. Hard vs soft law: Alternatives, complements and antagonists in international governance [J]. Minnesota Law Review, 2010, 94(3): 788–798.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HAN L Y. Let bygones be bygones: A study on the DSM of WTO [M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2009: 61–183 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. RISSE-KAPPEN T. Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 20.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. LI Y T. Impact of the China-New Zealand FTA on China’s agriculture and policy suggestion [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2011, 28(5): 106–109 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Milk powder imported grows by 20% year on year from Jan to Nov 2014 [EB/OL]. (2015-12-10) [2015-01-20]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/food/2015-01/20/c_127402897.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhao  (赵 军).

Additional information

Foundation item: the Chinese Education Ministry Key Research Program (No. 14JJD810017), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M581553)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Hu, Y. Formal or informal? The dispute settlement mechanisms of China’s free trade agreements. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 21, 44–50 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1697-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-016-1697-0

Keywords

CLC number

Navigation