Skip to main content
Log in

Monotonicity evaluation method of monitoring feature series based on ranking mutual information

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a prerequisite for effective prognostics, the goodness of the features affects the complexity of the prognostic methods. Comparing to features quality evaluation in diagnostics, features evaluation for prognostics is a new problem. Normally, the monotonic tendency of feature series can be used as the visual representation of equipment damage cumulation so that forecasting its future health states is easy to implement. Through introducing the concept of ranking mutual information in ordinal case, a monotonicity evaluation method of monitoring feature series is proposed. Finally, this method is verified by the simulating feature series and the results verify its effectivity. For the specific application in industry, the evaluation results can be used as the standard for selecting prognostic feature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahamad A K, Saon S, Hiyama T. Predicting remaining useful life of rotating machinery based artificial neural network [J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2010, 60(4): 1078–1087.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Heng A, Zhang S, Tan A C C, et al. Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2009, 23(3): 724–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tran V T, Yang B S. An intelligent condition-based maintenance platform for rotating machinery [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3): 2977–2988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Camci F, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, et al. Feature evaluation for effective bearing prognostics [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2013, 29(4): 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Medjaher K, Camci F, Zerhouni N. Feature extraction and evaluation for health assessment and failure prognostics [C]// Proceedings of First European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society. Dresden, Germany: Anibal Bregon, 2012: 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peng H, Long F, Ding C. Feature selection based on mutual information: Criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2005, 27(8): 1226–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu Q H, Guo M Z, Yu D R, et al. Information entropy for ordinal classification [J]. Science China: Information Sciences, 2010, 53(6): 1188–1200.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao X M, Zuo M J, Patel T. EMD, ranking mutual information and PCA based condition monitoring [C]// Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Montreal, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press, 2010: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-yu Zhao  (赵春宇).

Additional information

Foundation item: the Test Technique Research Project (No. 2014SZJY3101)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Cy., Liu, Jj., Ma, L. et al. Monotonicity evaluation method of monitoring feature series based on ranking mutual information. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 20, 380–384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-015-1641-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-015-1641-8

Key words

CLC number

Navigation