Skip to main content
Log in

An efficient approach for solving yard crane scheduling in a container terminal

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An efficient approach for yard crane (YC) scheduling is proposed in this paper. The definition of task group for YC scheduling is proposed. A mixed integer programming (MIP) model is developed. In the model, objective functions are subject to the minimization of the total delay of complete time for all task groups and the minimization of block-to-block movements of YCs. Due to the computational scale of the non-deterministic polynomial (NP) complete problem regarding YC scheduling, a rolling-horizon decision-making strategy is employed to solve this problem, by converting the MIP model into another MIP model in the scheduling of each rolling period. Afterwards, a heuristic algorithm based on modified A* search is developed to solve the converted model and obtain near optimal solution. Finally, the computational experiments are used to examine the performance of the proposed approach for YC scheduling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vob S, Stahlbock R. Operations research at container terminals: A literature update [J]. OR Spectrum, 2008, 30(1): 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S. Berthing ships at a multi-user container terminal with a limited quay capacity [J]. Transportation Research. Part E. Logistics and Transportation Review, 2008, 44(1): 136–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang D F, Jiang Z H, Yan W, et al. Integrating berth allocation and quay crane assignments [J]. Transportation Research. Part E. Logistics and Transportation Review, 2010, 46(6): 975–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mi W J, Yan W, He J L, et al. An investigation into yard allocation for outbound containers [J]. COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2009, 28(6): 1442–1457.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Shabayek A A, Yeung W W. A simulation model for the Kwai Chung container terminals in Hong Kong [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140(1): 1–11.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bielli M, Boulmakoul A, Mohamed R. Object oriented model for container terminal distributed simulation [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175(3): 1731–1751.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Canonaco P, Legato P, Mazza R M, et al. A queuing network model for the management of berth crane operations [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2008, 35(8): 2432–2446.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Zeng Q C, Yang Z Z. Integrating simulation and optimization to schedule loading operations in container terminals [J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2009, 36(6): 1935–1944.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Li W, Wu Y, Petering M E H, et al. Discrete time model and algorithms for container yard crane scheduling [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 198(1): 165–172.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang C Q, Wan YW, Liu J Y, et al. Dynamic crane deployment in container storage yards [J]. Transportation Research. Part B. Methodological, 2002, 36(6): 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. He J L, Chang D F, Mi, W J, et al. A hybrid parallel genetic algorithm for yard crane scheduling [J]. Transportation Research. Part E. Logistics and Transportation Review, 2010, 46(1): 36–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang D F, Jiang Z H, Yan W, et al. Developing a dynamic rolling-horizon decision strategy for yard crane scheduling [J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2011, 25(3): 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ng W C, Mak K L. Yard crane scheduling in port container terminals [J]. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 2005, 29(3): 263–276.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao J X, Lee D H, Chen J H, et al. The integrated yard truck and yard crane scheduling problem: Benders’ decomposition-based methods [J]. Transportation Research. Part E. Logistics and Transportation Review, 2010, 46(3): 344–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan W, Huang Y F, Chang D F, et al. An investigation into knowledge-based yard crane scheduling for container terminals [J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2011, 25(3): 462–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-liang He  (何军良).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71101090), the Shanghai Top Academic Discipline Project-Management Science & Engineering, the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Project (Nos. 12ZZ148, 13YZ080 and 14YZ112), the Ministry of Transport Research Projects (No. 2012-329-810-180) and the Shanghai Maritime University Research Project (Nos. 20120102 and 20110019)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, Jl., Zhang, Wm., Huang, Yf. et al. An efficient approach for solving yard crane scheduling in a container terminal. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 18, 606–619 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-013-1441-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-013-1441-y

Key words

CLC number

Navigation