Skip to main content
Log in

Limits to resources, economic growth and happiness

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Terrible scenario for the future aspect of our society was issued by “The Limits to Growth”. Basic problems that we confront are the restricted natural resources and the environment. Regarding the resources, the overall average of the reserve/production ratio is predicted to fall below 10 years by 2040. Aggressive developments of mines based on the sense of urgency for metal resources cause strong confliction with the environment and the people living there. Resultantly, urban mine becomes more realistic than before. From the view point of ecological foot print, 5.3 globes are needed if all the people living in the world attain the affluent life same as USA. On the other hand, it is clear that we can get larger utility by smaller goods if our scale of satisfaction is reduced. We have to notice that happiness is our ultimate purpose, economy and industry are intermediate, and natural resources support the all from the basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meadows D H, Meadows D L, Randers J, et al. The limits to growth [M]. New York: Universe Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meadows D H, Meadows D L, Randers J, et al. The limits to growth: The 30-year update [M]. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Takeda K. Stop the recycling [M]. Tokyo: Seishun Publisher, 2000 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. NIMS. Nano-sparking innovation, nanotech bulletin [EB/OL]. (2007-01-05). http://www.nims.go.jp/ecomaterial/hal/MR/doc/070705press.pdf.

  5. Nakanishi J. Calculation of environmental risks [M]. Tokyo: Iwanami Publisher, 2003 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nakanishi J. Environmental strategy of water [M]. Tokyo: Iwanami Publisher, 1994 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weitzsaecker E U. Ecological rucksacks [M]. Tokyo: Energy Saving Center, 1998 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taniguchi M. Global environmental forum [EB/OL]. (2009-01-05). http://www.gef.or.jp/activity/economy/stn/nickel_090603/nickel_report_taniguchi.html.

  9. Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth (new catalyst bioregional series) [M]. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publisher, 1995 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida T. Advanced decline country: Cuba [M]. Tokyo: Tsukiji Shokan, 2009 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frey B S, Stutzer A. Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human wellbeing [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wikipedia. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs [EB/OL]. (2007-01-05). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow’s_hierarchy_of_needs#cite_note-honolulu-0.

  13. Layard R. Happiness: Lessons from a new science [M]. London: Penguin, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schumacher E F. Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered [M]. London: Blond & Briggs Ltd., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Meadows D. Indicators and information systems for sustainable development, sustainable cities [M]. London: Earthscan, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoji Taniguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taniguchi, S. Limits to resources, economic growth and happiness. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 17, 364–369 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-012-1288-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-012-1288-7

Key words

CLC number

Navigation