Abstract
The performance of vacuum arc remelting (VAR) ingot depends largely on ingot structure and chemical uniformity, which are strongly influenced by molten pool profile that is influenced by VAR process. To better understand the effect of remelting current on molten pool profile of titanium alloy ingot during VAR process, a 3D finite element model is developed by the ANSYS software. The results show that there are three remelting stages during VAR process when the remelting current is 2.0 kA. The molten pool depth increases gradually from 30 to 320 s, then the change of molten pool depth is very small during the steady state stage from 320 to 386 s, and lastly the molten pool depth becomes shallow after 386 s. The melting rate and temperature of superheat increase with the remelting current increasing, which leads to the augment of molten pool volume. In the end, the total remelting time and steady state molten pool time decrease with the melting current from 1.6 to 2.8 kA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang X, Barratt M D, Ward R M, et al. The effect of VAR process parameters on white spot formation in INCONEL 718 [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2004, 39(24): 7169–7174.
Zanner F J, Adasczik C, Obrien T, et al. Relationship between furnace voltage signatures and the operational parameters arc power, arc current, CO pressure, and electrode gap during vacuum arc melting INCONEL 718 [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 1984, 15: 117–119.
Bertram L A, Schunk P R, Kempka S N, et al. The macroscale simulation of remelting processes [J]. Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1998, 50(3): 18–21.
Quatravaux T, Ryberon S, Hans S, et al. Transient VAR ingot growth modelling: Application to specialty steels [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2004, 39(24): 7183–7191.
Xu X, Ward R M, Jacobs M H, et al. Tree-ring formation during vacuum arc remelting of INCONEL 718. Part I. Experimental investigation [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2002, 33(6): 1795–1804.
Mitchell A. Melting, casting, and forging problems in titanium alloys [J]. Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1997, 49(6): 40–42.
Blase T A, Guo Z X, Shi Z, et al. A 3D conjugate heat transfer model for continuous wire casting [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2004, 365: 318–324.
Radovic Z, Lalovic M. Numerical simulation of steel ingot solidification process [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 160(2): 156–159.
Su X. Computer aided optimization of an investment bimetal casting process [D]. Cincinnati: Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Nuclear Engineering, University of Cincinnati, 2001.
Jardy A, Falk L, Ablitzer D. The energy exchange during vacuum arc remelting [J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1992, 19(3): 226–232.
Kermanpur A, Evans D G, Siddall R J, et al. Effect of process parameters on grain structure formation during VAR of INCONEL alloy 718 [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2004, 39(24): 7175–7182.
Hayakawa H, Fukada N, Udagawa T, et al. Solidification structure and segregation in cast ingots of titanium alloy produced by vacuum arc consumable electrode method [J]. ISIJ International, 1991, 31: 775–784.
Bertram L A, Minisandram R S. Modeling for casting and solidification processing [M]. New York: Marcel Dekker Press, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: the National Basic Research Program (973) of China (No. 2007CB613802)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Zj., Kou, Hc., Zhao, Xh. et al. Effect of remelting current on molten pool profile of titanium alloy ingot during vacuum arc remelting process. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 16, 133–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-011-1107-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-011-1107-6